Key Points
Federal judge ruled NFA registration unconstitutional after Congress zeroed the $200 tax on silencers and short-barreled rifles.
Trump DOJ declined to appeal by August 12 deadline, allowing injunction to take effect August 13.
Injunction applies only to named parties and 20 Republican-led states, not nationwide.
Gun control groups warn silencers and easily concealable weapons can now reach wrong hands.
A Texas federal judge has effectively deregulated silencers, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns by striking down their registration requirements under the 92-year-old National Firearms Act. On August 5, U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix ruled these restrictions unconstitutional after Congress eliminated the $200 federal transfer and manufacturing tax on these items in 2025. The Trump administration declined to appeal by the August 12 deadline, allowing the injunction to take effect on August 13.
What the Texas ruling changed
Judge Hendrix determined that without an active tax collection mechanism, the federal government lacks constitutional authority to mandate NFA registration, fingerprinting, and background checks for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and any other weapons. The ruling stems from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed in 2025, which reduced the NFA transfer and manufacturing taxes to zero dollars. The judge issued a permanent injunction blocking ATF and DOJ enforcement against specific parties in the consolidated cases Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF and Jensen v. ATF.
Who can act now under the injunction
The injunction applies to named parties and their customers, members, and agencies. Covered parties include Silencer Shop Foundation, Palmetto State Armory, SilencerCo, Gun Owners of America, and 20 Republican-led states including Texas, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. However, the injunction is party-specific, not nationwide. Acting on this ruling when you are not a covered party remains a federal felony carrying up to ten years in prison, a $10,000 fine, and firearm forfeiture.
DOJ’s decision not to appeal
The Trump administration had a seven-day window to seek emergency relief from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. That deadline expired at midnight on August 12. A Justice Department spokesperson stated the department is “assessing the impact of the court’s ruling” but declined to seek a stay. The DOJ retains the right to appeal the decision on the merits, though nearly 50 Republican lawmakers urged the department not to appeal.
Gun control groups sound alarm
Brady, Everytown for Gun Safety, and GIFFORDS condemned the DOJ’s inaction, warning that silencers and easily concealable weapons can now reach the wrong hands. Brady President Kris Brown stated: “At midnight, uniquely lethal weapons and devices were deregulated for the first time in nearly a century.” Gun control advocates note that silencers, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns are rarely used in crimes today because of NFA restrictions. The ruling also complicates state enforcement: states like Alaska, Georgia, Michigan, Colorado, Ohio, and Washington have laws that require federal NFA registration, making suppressor purchases legally impossible until those states revise their laws.
Final Thoughts
The Trump administration’s decision not to appeal a Texas ruling that deregulates silencers and short-barreled rifles marks a historic shift in federal firearms enforcement. Gun control groups warn of public safety risks, while Second Amendment advocates celebrate the outcome. The ruling applies only to named parties and states, leaving nationwide enforcement in legal limbo.
FAQs
Only if you are a covered party in the Silencer Shop Foundation or Jensen cases. Acting outside those parties remains a federal felony. Verify your status with legal counsel before purchasing.
Congress zeroed the transfer and manufacturing taxes on silencers, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, which prompted the constitutional challenge.
Yes. The DOJ declined to seek emergency relief by August 12 but retains the right to appeal the decision on the merits at any time.
No. The injunction is party-specific and applies to named individuals, businesses, and 20 Republican-led states. It does not deregulate these items for all Americans.
The 20 covered states are Texas, Alaska, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming, and others named as parties.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Huzaifa Zahoor
Co FounderHuzaifa Zahoor is the engineer who built Meyka. He has spent years writing Python, training AI models, and building data pipelines specifically for financial markets. His technical articles have reached over 30,000 readers on Medium, so he knows how to make complex things easy to follow. If this article touches on how the tools work, he is the person who actually built them.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)