Singapore Couple Fined S$8,500 After Four Dogs Escape, Injure Labrador on August 25
Key Points
Couple fined S$8,500 total on August 25 after four unlicensed dogs escaped and injured Labrador retriever.
Four dogs included two Rottweilers and two Cane Corsos, restricted breeds requiring special approval.
Victim spent S$3,360 on dog veterinary care and S$700 on own medical treatment.
Singapore law allows only one restricted breed per owner unless Director-General grants permission.
A Singapore court on August 25 fined a married couple S$8,500 combined after their four unlicensed dogs escaped and attacked a neighbour’s Labrador retriever in Bedok on January 9, 2024. Merissa Leow Hwee Li, 51, was fined S$3,100 and ordered to pay S$4,000 compensation. Her husband Lionel Tay Wei Yuan, 52, was fined S$5,500. The dogs, which included restricted breeds, had no valid licences and the couple broke multiple pet-keeping laws.
How the dogs escaped and what happened
At about 9pm on January 9, 2024, a domestic helper was walking her employer’s Labrador retriever near Sennett Road in Bedok when four dogs burst through a faulty gate from a nearby house. The four dogs began scuffling with the Labrador on the road. Both owners and their maids rushed out and separated the animals. The Labrador suffered a deep open wound 9 centimetres long and 7 centimetres deep on its neck, plus puncture wounds on its body. The domestic helper developed foot pain and sought medical treatment.
Licensing violations and restricted breed rules
Investigations revealed none of the four dogs held valid licences. One had never been licensed, another’s licence was cancelled, and two had expired licences. The couple owned two Rottweilers and two Cane Corsos, both restricted breeds in Singapore. Singapore law permits only one restricted breed per owner unless special permission is granted from the Director-General of Animal Health and Welfare. The couple also kept more than three dogs at their home without approval, breaching additional rules.
Court penalties and compensation
Leow pleaded guilty to two charges under the Animals and Birds (Dog Licensing and Control) Rules for letting her dog be found at large and owning a Rottweiler without a valid licence. Seven additional charges were considered in sentencing. Tay pleaded guilty to three charges for owning a dog without valid licence, keeping more than three dogs at home, and keeping more than one restricted breed dog. Two further charges were considered. The victim spent S$3,360 on veterinary treatment for her dog and S$700 on her own medical bills.
What pet owners in Singapore need to know
Singapore’s pet licensing rules are not optional. Penalties for keeping more than one restricted breed, owning a dog without a valid licence, or letting a dog be found at large can each reach S$5,000. The couple’s lawyer argued they were genuine dog lovers who took in animals on compassionate grounds and were not running an illegal breeding operation. He said the gate had recently been serviced and the escape was not through negligence. The couple paid their fines in full.
Final Thoughts
Singapore enforces strict pet licensing and restricted breed rules with real financial consequences. Pet owners must maintain valid licences for all dogs and comply with restrictions on dangerous breeds. Faulty infrastructure does not excuse violations.
FAQs
They owned four unlicensed dogs including restricted breeds, violated multiple pet laws, and caused injury to another dog. Penalties for each violation can reach S$5,000.
Rottweilers and Cane Corsos are restricted breeds. Owners can keep only one unless they get special permission from the Director-General of Animal Health and Welfare.
The dog owner spent S$3,360 on veterinary treatment for her Labrador and S$700 on her own medical bills, totalling S$4,060.
Leow faced two main charges plus seven considered in sentencing. Tay faced three main charges plus two considered in sentencing, including keeping more than three dogs at home.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Danny Kontos
Co FounderDanny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)