Meyka Pro banner
Global Market Insights

Second Circuit Rules First Amendment Protects Recording Police in Public on August 20

August 20, 2026
01:31 PM
3 min read

Key Points

Second Circuit rules First Amendment protects recording police in public spaces.

Decision applies to New York, Connecticut, Vermont.

Qualified immunity prevents damages for 2018 arrest.

Eight other federal circuits already recognize this right.

Be the first to rate this article

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the First Amendment protects people’s right to record police activity in public spaces. In Massimino v. Benoit, decided August 17, the court held that recording law enforcement from a public area is constitutionally protected speech. The ruling aligns the Second Circuit with eight other federal appeals courts on the issue, though the plaintiff cannot recover damages because his right was not clearly established when he was arrested in 2018.

What the court decided

The Second Circuit ruled that citizens have a First Amendment right to record publicly visible police activity while standing in public areas. Keith Massimino was arrested on October 30, 2018, for filming the exterior of the Waterbury, Connecticut police station from a public sidewalk. Sergeants Matthew Benoit and Frank Laone detained him, citing security concerns. The court found that recording itself is protected speech, whether the person intends to share it later or livestream it in real time.

Why this matters beyond journalism

The court emphasized that this right belongs to everyone, not just accredited journalists. The National Press Photographers Association noted that Massimino identified himself as a “First Amendment auditing hobbyist,” yet the court still recognized his constitutional protection. The opinion states that recording can express views about the subject or about constitutional protections themselves.

The qualified immunity problem

Although the Second Circuit recognized the constitutional right, Massimino cannot recover damages from the officers. The court ruled that his right was not clearly established in 2018 when he was arrested. Qualified immunity protects officers from liability if the law was not clearly established at the time of their actions. The charges against Massimino were dropped, but he received no compensation for his detention.

Where the Second Circuit stands now

The Second Circuit hears federal appeals from New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The panel stated it was “joining a growing chorus” of eight other federal circuits that have already recognized the right to record police in public. This ruling sets binding precedent for the three-state region and signals broader judicial consensus on First Amendment protections for citizen recording.

Final Thoughts

The Second Circuit’s ruling affirms a constitutional right to record police in public spaces, but qualified immunity limits remedies for past violations. Citizens in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont now have clear legal protection for recording law enforcement activity from public areas.

FAQs

Can you record police from a public sidewalk?

Yes. The Second Circuit ruled the First Amendment protects recording police activity visible from public spaces, even if you are not a journalist.

Why couldn’t Massimino recover damages?

Qualified immunity protected the officers because his right to record was not clearly established when he was arrested in 2018, even though it is now.

Does this ruling apply nationwide?

No. The Second Circuit decision binds New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. Eight other federal circuits have already recognized the same right.

What counts as recording police activity?

Recording publicly visible portions of police buildings or officers from a public area where the public has a right to stand is protected speech.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Danny Kontos

Co Founder

Danny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)