Key Points
Prince Philip strongly disapproved of Sarah Ferguson's understanding of royal responsibilities.
The 1992 toe-sucking scandal intensified Philip's negative view and cemented family tensions.
Biographer Jane Dismore revealed Philip made Ferguson feel unwelcome during his lifetime.
Philip's strict standards reflected generational differences in how royal duty should be conducted.
Prince Philip’s relationship with Sarah Ferguson has become a focal point of royal discussion following recent revelations from biographer Jane Dismore. The late Duke of Edinburgh, who passed away on April 9, 2021, reportedly had significant tensions with his ex-daughter-in-law over her perceived lack of understanding about royal responsibilities. According to Dismore’s appearance on the podcast “The Firm: Blood, Lies, and Royal Succession,” Philip believed Ferguson did not grasp what it truly meant to be a member of the Royal Family. These newly surfaced details shed light on the personal dynamics within the Windsor household and explain why Ferguson felt unwelcome during Philip’s lifetime.
Philip’s Disapproval of Ferguson’s Royal Conduct
Prince Philip held strong views about royal protocol and expected family members to uphold strict standards of behavior. According to royal expert Jane Dismore, Philip didn’t like Ferguson and made it clear she wasn’t welcome when he was present. The Duke believed Ferguson lacked the discipline and understanding necessary for royal life, viewing her conduct as beneath the standards expected of the Windsor family.
The Toe-Sucking Scandal and Its Aftermath
Ferguson’s reputation suffered significantly following the 1992 toe-sucking scandal in St. Tropez, where photographs showed her with financial adviser John Bryan in compromising positions. This incident occurred just five months after her separation from Prince Andrew was announced in March 1992. The scandal intensified Philip’s disapproval and cemented his view that Ferguson represented a lapse in royal judgment. The photographs became a defining moment that shaped how senior royals, particularly Philip, viewed her place within the family.
Royal Family Standards and Personal Judgment
Philip’s criticism of Ferguson reflected broader expectations within the Royal Family about personal conduct and public image. The Duke believed that royal status came with non-negotiable responsibilities to maintain dignity and discretion. Biographer Dismore noted that Philip viewed Ferguson’s actions as demonstrating poor judgment and an inappropriate attitude toward royal life. This perspective highlighted the generational divide between Philip’s strict interpretation of royal duty and Ferguson’s more modern, less formal approach to her position.
Impact on Royal Relationships and Family Dynamics
Philip’s strong stance against Ferguson created lasting tension within the Royal Family structure. Ferguson learned to navigate royal events carefully, avoiding situations where she might encounter the Duke. The relationship between Philip and Ferguson remained strained until his death, affecting how the family managed public appearances and private gatherings. This dynamic illustrated how individual personalities and conflicting values could shape the internal workings of one of the world’s most prominent institutions.
Final Thoughts
Prince Philip’s documented disapproval of Sarah Ferguson reveals the strict standards the late Duke upheld regarding royal conduct and family reputation. His belief that Ferguson lacked understanding of royal responsibilities, combined with the 1992 scandal, created a lasting rift that defined their relationship. These revelations provide insight into the personal tensions that existed behind palace walls and demonstrate how individual judgments shaped family dynamics within the Windsor household.
FAQs
Philip believed Ferguson lacked understanding of royal responsibilities and demonstrated poor judgment, particularly through the 1992 toe-sucking scandal in St. Tropez.
Dismore stated Philip didn’t welcome Ferguson and viewed her as having an inappropriate attitude toward royal life and responsibilities.
The toe-sucking photographs intensified Philip’s disapproval and reinforced his belief that Ferguson represented a lapse in royal judgment and family standards.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

Danny Kontos
Co FounderDanny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)