Law and Government

Nintendo’s Palworld Patent Rejected by Japan Office on July 18

July 19, 2026
08:12 PM
4 min read

Key Points

Japan Patent Office rejected Nintendo's touchscreen monster-catching patent on July 18, 2026.

Examiner cited 2013 fan-made Pokemon Generations video as prior art, ruling mechanics lacked novelty.

Nintendo argued fan game infringed copyrights and should not count, but examiner rejected defense.

Nintendo has three months to appeal or file revised application with narrower claims.

Sentiment:NEGATIVE (-0.68)
Be the first to rate this article

Japan’s Patent Office issued a formal rejection of Nintendo’s touchscreen-based monster-catching patent application on July 18, dealing another blow to the company’s legal strategy against Palworld. The examiner ruled the mechanics lacked an inventive step, citing prior art including a 2013 fan-made Pokemon game called Pokemon Generations. Nintendo argued the fan project should not count as evidence because it infringed Pokemon copyrights, but the examiner rejected that defense. The patent was part of a family of claims being used against Palworld in ongoing litigation.

How the 2013 fan game became evidence

The Japan Patent Office cited gameplay footage from Pokemon Generations, a June 2013 YouTube video created by indie developers. The video demonstrated 3D movement, real-time creature capture, and combat mechanics more than eight years before Nintendo filed its patent application in December 2021. Nintendo and Pokemon Company argued in their response that the video should be excluded because it infringed Pokemon copyrights. The examiner rejected this claim, ruling that copyright status does not affect whether publicly available footage demonstrates existing mechanics.

Nintendo submitted an opinion letter challenging the examiner’s prior art citations, focusing on the Pokemon Generations video. The company claimed the footage was merely infringing content and that describing it using Pokemon character names was inappropriate. Nintendo also argued that gameplay video alone cannot prove an actual, operable game program. The examiner dismissed both points, stating that copyright concerns are separate from patent novelty analysis and that the video adequately demonstrated the mechanics in question.

What happens next for Nintendo

Nintendo has three options within three months: appeal the decision to a JPO administrative panel, file a revised divisional application with narrower claims, or abandon the patent effort. According to Games Fray, the examiner’s language suggests the standard examination process is complete. Earlier reports indicated Palworld 1.0 already broke free of Nintendo’s patent restrictions, meaning the company’s latest filings targeted only older game versions. With Meyka grading Nintendo (7974.T) a B+ and forecasting the stock at 11,482 yen within one year, the patent setback adds legal uncertainty to a company already facing headwinds from a 31.5% year-to-date decline.

The broader pattern of Nintendo’s patent losses

This rejection marks another setback in Nintendo’s patent campaign against Palworld. The company has already lost several critical patents in both US and Japanese courts. Patent analyst Florian Mueller noted the examiner is now finished with standard review, leaving Nintendo with limited options to strengthen its case. The cumulative effect suggests Palworld will likely operate without significant legal impediment going forward.

Final Thoughts

Nintendo’s patent rejection in Japan further weakens its legal case against Palworld. With the examiner ruling that touchscreen creature-catching mechanics lack novelty, Nintendo faces a choice between costly appeals or accepting defeat. The stock’s B+ rating and forward forecast of 11,482 yen suggest investors see value despite litigation losses.

FAQs

Why did Japan reject Nintendo’s monster-catching patent?

The examiner ruled the mechanics lacked an inventive step over prior art, including a 2013 fan game and existing Pokemon titles. Nintendo could not combine touchscreen controls and creature capture into something sufficiently novel.

Can Nintendo appeal the patent rejection?

Yes, Nintendo has three months to appeal to a JPO administrative panel, file a revised application with narrower claims, or abandon the effort. The examiner stated the standard examination process is complete.

Does this mean Palworld can operate freely now?

Likely yes. Earlier reports showed Palworld 1.0 already escaped Nintendo’s patent restrictions. Nintendo’s latest filings targeted only older game versions, so current Palworld appears legally safe.

What was Pokemon Generations and why did it matter?

Pokemon Generations was a 2013 indie fan project demonstrating 3D Pokemon gameplay with capture mechanics on YouTube. The examiner used it as prior art to show Nintendo’s claimed innovations already existed publicly.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Huzaifa Zahoor

Co Founder

Huzaifa Zahoor is the engineer who built Meyka. He has spent years writing Python, training AI models, and building data pipelines specifically for financial markets. His technical articles have reached over 30,000 readers on Medium, so he knows how to make complex things easy to follow. If this article touches on how the tools work, he is the person who actually built them.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)