Key Points
New Mexico AG accuses DOJ of withholding unredacted Epstein files for 130+ days.
Torrez says unredacted records contain names of survivors and witnesses needed to build criminal charges.
DOJ claims it substantively responded but welcomes further New Mexico investigation.
Torrez warns each day of delay allows witnesses to relocate and evidence to degrade.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez publicly accused the US Department of Justice on Thursday of withholding unredacted files related to Jeffrey Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, claiming the 130-day delay is crippling the state’s criminal investigation. In a June 30 letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Torrez warned that each passing day erodes the foundation for potential prosecution as witnesses relocate, memories fade, and evidence degrades.
Why New Mexico reopened the Epstein investigation
New Mexico halted its initial Epstein investigation in 2019 after federal prosecutors asked the state to stand down. The investigation resumed in February 2026 following the DOJ’s release of millions of files related to Epstein. Those records contained heavily redacted accounts showing multiple survivors were brought to Zorro Ranch near Santa Fe and subjected to sexual abuse and exploitation.
What records Torrez says he needs
Torrez’s letter states that unredacted files contain names of survivors, witnesses, and alleged co-conspirators essential to locating victims and building criminal charges. The heavily redacted public records already show illegal activity occurred at the ranch, but without the unredacted versions, Torrez argues the state cannot fulfill its obligation to investigate and prosecute. He says New Mexico is the only agency currently conducting a criminal investigation into alleged crimes at Zorro Ranch.
DOJ response and the timeline dispute
A DOJ spokesperson told CNN the agency “substantively responded last month to requests from the New Mexico Attorney General’s Office” and said it welcomes New Mexico’s investigation. However, Torrez’s letter states that despite verbal assurances of cooperation, access to requested records has not been granted and no substantive response was provided for over 130 days. Torrez called the delay unreasonable under any standard. The DOJ said it stands ready to assist if New Mexico’s investigation uncovers potential federal crimes.
What happens next for survivors
Torrez warned that each day of delay allows witnesses to relocate, trauma-strained memories to fade further, and physical evidence to degrade or be lost. New Mexico authorities searched the ranch in March. A separate state commission is also investigating the property and has issued subpoenas to multiple organizations. The clash between state and federal authorities highlights a broader tension over who controls the Epstein investigation and what information the public will ultimately learn about crimes at the ranch.
Final Thoughts
The dispute centers on whether New Mexico can access unredacted DOJ files to prosecute alleged crimes at Zorro Ranch. Without those names and details, Torrez argues any future prosecution weakens with each passing day. The DOJ says it has responded, but the 130-day gap suggests coordination between state and federal investigators remains strained.
FAQs
New Mexico reopened its investigation in February 2026 after the DOJ released millions of Epstein files. Those records showed multiple survivors were taken to the ranch and sexually abused there.
More than 130 days have elapsed since New Mexico’s initial request in February, according to Torrez’s June 30 letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Witnesses will relocate and become unreachable, trauma-strained memories will fade, and physical and documentary evidence will degrade or be lost, weakening any future prosecution.
Yes. New Mexico says it is the only agency currently conducting a criminal investigation into alleged crimes at the ranch, though a separate state commission is also investigating and has issued subpoenas.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Danny Kontos
Co FounderDanny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)