NCLT Approves Subhash Chandra Settlement: ₹22,006 Crore Debt Cut to ₹6.5 Crore
Key Points
NCLT approved ₹22,006 crore debt settlement for ₹6.5 crore on August 25, 2026.
99.97% haircut forces HDFC Bank and LIC Housing Finance to accept massive losses.
HDFC Bank exploring NCLAT appeal after only 3.2% of its ₹680 crore claim admitted.
Congress and opposition parties question fairness of insolvency system for billionaires.
India’s bankruptcy court has approved a resolution plan allowing Zee Media founder Subhash Chandra to pay ₹6.5 crore against ₹22,006.57 crore in admitted creditor claims. The National Company Law Tribunal ruling on August 25 forces lenders to accept a 99.97% haircut. The decision has triggered political outcry and legal challenges from major banks, raising concerns about fairness in India’s insolvency system.
How the NCLT approved the controversial settlement
NCLT Member Nilesh Sharma approved the repayment plan on August 25 after 80.814% of creditors voted in favor. Sharma was appointed as a third member after two other judges disagreed on the case. The tribunal rejected objections from dissenting creditors led by LIC Housing Finance, which argued the payout was unviable and unlawful. The order required exclusion of certain creditor claims filed through intermediaries before the plan takes effect.
Banks face massive losses and consider appeals
HDFC Bank said only 3.2% of its ₹680 crore total claim has been admitted under the NCLT order. The bank opposed the resolution and is exploring an appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. Other lenders including State Bank of India and Punjab National Bank also face steep losses on their claims.
Political backlash and fairness concerns
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi accused the Modi government of creating two systems for billionaires versus ordinary citizens. Congress general secretary Jairam Ramesh called the settlement a mundan, not a haircut, saying it mocked the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya sarcastically congratulated Chandra, questioning inconsistent treatment of defaulters.
Chandra’s defense and asset claims
Subhash Chandra’s office stated he is only a personal guarantor, not a borrower. The statement claimed his total assets were ₹39.08 crore in 2016 and ₹31.79 crore in 2024, including one residential house worth ₹25 crore. Chandra said he paid employee salaries from his personal account when borrowing companies could not, reducing his net worth. The borrowing entities have repaid ₹43,000 crore to date, according to his office.
Final Thoughts
The NCLT ruling exposes deep tensions in India’s insolvency framework. With HDFC Bank and others exploring appeals and political parties demanding accountability, the case will likely test whether such extreme haircuts can survive appellate scrutiny.
FAQs
A haircut is the percentage difference between what creditors are owed and what they actually receive. A 99.97% haircut means lenders recover only 0.03% of their claims.
HDFC Bank’s ₹680 crore claim was reduced to just ₹21.76 crore (3.2% admitted). The bank voted against the plan and is exploring an appeal to recover more.
Yes. HDFC Bank and other dissenting creditors can appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. The case may face further legal scrutiny over fairness and viability.
Chandra’s office claims his total personal guarantee liability was ₹3,992 crore, not ₹22,006 crore. The higher figure includes claims from other creditors in the insolvency proceedings.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Danny Kontos
Co FounderDanny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)