Key Points
Osaka High Court upheld Ohi plant permit, overturning 2020 lower court ruling that cancelled it.
Dispute centered on earthquake safety calculations and whether data uncertainty required extra safety margins.
Court found Kansai Electric set conservative earthquake parameters that properly account for uncertainty.
Residents plan to appeal to Supreme Court but face high legal bar to overturn regulator decisions.
Japan’s Osaka High Court ruled on May 28 that the Ohi nuclear plant’s operating permit is valid, overturning a lower court decision that had cancelled it. About 120 residents from six prefectures had challenged the permit, claiming the plant’s earthquake safety standards were too low. The high court sided with the government regulator, saying the safety review contained no serious errors.
What the Court Decided
The Osaka High Court ruled that the Nuclear Regulation Authority’s permit for the Ohi plant’s units 3 and 4 was legally sound. Judge Masafumi Kawabata said the regulator’s judgment showed no unreasonable flaws. This reversed a December 2020 lower court decision that had cancelled the permit, marking the first time a post-Fukushima safety review was overturned.
The Core Dispute: Earthquake Estimates
The lawsuit centered on how the plant calculated the maximum expected earthquake shaking, called the “standard seismic motion.” Residents argued the calculation underestimated uncertainty in earthquake data. The high court found that Kansai Electric Power set conservative values for key earthquake parameters, which properly accounted for data uncertainty without needing to add extra safety margins.
What Happens Next
Unit 3 is currently operating. Unit 4 is scheduled to restart in June after routine maintenance. Residents’ lawyers said they are considering an appeal to Japan’s Supreme Court. The Nuclear Regulation Authority said it will continue strict safety reviews based on lessons from the 2011 Fukushima disaster.
Why This Matters for Nuclear Policy
This ruling strengthens the government’s ability to restart nuclear plants under post-Fukushima safety rules. Since 2011, courts have mostly sided with the government in nuclear disputes despite initial resident victories. The decision signals that courts will not overturn regulator permits unless safety flaws are clear and undeniable.
Final Thoughts
The high court’s decision allows the Ohi plant to continue operating and sets a high bar for residents to challenge nuclear permits through courts. Residents plan to pursue an appeal, but the ruling reflects a pattern of courts backing the government on nuclear safety after initial skepticism.
FAQs
The maximum expected earthquake shaking used to design nuclear plant safety systems. Power companies calculate it from local fault data; regulators review the methodology.
The 2020 lower court ruled the regulator failed to verify whether earthquake data uncertainty required additional safety margins in the plant’s design.
Yes. Residents’ legal team is considering a Supreme Court appeal, though no formal decision has been announced.
Disclaimer:
The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes. Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.
About Author

Huzaifa Zahoor
Co FounderHuzaifa Zahoor is the engineer who built Meyka. He has spent years writing Python, training AI models, and building data pipelines specifically for financial markets. His technical articles have reached over 30,000 readers on Medium, so he knows how to make complex things easy to follow. If this article touches on how the tools work, he is the person who actually built them.
What brings you to Meyka?
Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.
I'm here to read news
Find more articles like this one
I'm here to research stocks
Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock
I'm here to track my Portfolio
Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)