Harvey Norman Copped $35M Fine Over Misleading Ads on July 29

The Federal Court handed down penalties totalling A$55 million against Harvey Norman and Latitude Financial on July 28 for a nationwide advertising campaign that misled millions of Australians. Harvey Norman must pay A$35 million, while Latitude Financial pays A$20 million. The case centred on ads run between January 2020 and August 2021 that promoted 60-month interest-free payments and no deposit required, but failed to disclose customers had to open a credit card and pay monthly account service fees and establishment fees.

What the ads promised versus what customers actually got

The advertisements appeared in newspapers, radio, and television thousands of times across Australia, reaching millions of people. They promoted a simple offer: buy high-ticket items at Harvey Norman with 60 months interest-free and no deposit required. In reality, customers had to apply for a Latitude GO Mastercard to access the deal. They then faced monthly account service fees and, until March 15, 2021, establishment fees. Customers who bought between March 16 and August 11, 2021, and paid off their purchase during that period faced a minimum of A$537 in additional fees alone.

Why the judge increased Harvey Norman’s penalty

Justice Michael O’Bryan imposed a larger fine on Harvey Norman than Latitude Financial because of the retailer’s response to the court case. Latitude apologised to customers after the ruling. Harvey Norman’s senior leadership refused to offer a personal apology, and founder Gerry Harvey publicly criticised the legal system as “f—ed” in October 2024, months after the initial court loss. O’Bryan said this showed “complete disregard” for customer harm and drove up Harvey Norman’s penalty to A$35 million to force better processes and deter future breaches.

The compliance failure and market impact

Justice O’Bryan found both companies’ compliance processes were “wholly inadequate” to prevent the misleading conduct. He described Harvey Norman’s failure as “particularly striking” given the company’s size. The court also ordered both retailers to display corrective advertising on their website homepages for 90 days. ASIC Chair Sarah Court called the combined A$55 million penalty “a strong warning to the market” about the importance of truthful advertising in consumer finance.

What this means for Harvey Norman shareholders

Harvey Norman (HVN.AX) rose 6.6% to A$5.03 on the day of the ruling, despite the massive fine. Meyka grades the stock a B with a 12-month forecast of A$5.87, suggesting limited upside from current levels. The company’s PE ratio of 10.7 and dividend yield of 6% appeal to income investors, but the regulatory breach and reputational damage add execution risk. The fine represents roughly 0.6% of Harvey Norman’s A$6 billion market cap, a material but not catastrophic hit to shareholder value.

Final Thoughts

Harvey Norman faces a A$35 million penalty for hiding credit card fees in interest-free ads, with founder Gerry Harvey’s public criticism of the courts cited as a reason for the larger fine. The ruling sets a precedent for ASIC enforcement in consumer finance marketing and underscores the cost of misleading disclosure.

FAQs

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.