Meyka Pro banner
Law and Government

Chinese Investor Fined $508,000 for Land Banking in Victoria

October 1, 2026
09:21 AM
4 min read

Key Points

Chinese investor Fengqin Li fined $508,000 for failing to build on Berwick property within four-year requirement.

Li purchased land in 2011, left Australia after one month, never returned to develop.

Court imposed freezing order and registered charge over property to prevent sale.

ATO addressed 217 foreign investment breaches in 2024-25, forcing disposal of 111 properties.

Be the first to rate this article

A Chinese resident has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay $508,000 to the Australian Taxation Office after failing to build a dwelling on vacant land in Berwick, Victoria, within four years of purchase. Fengqin Li bought the 401 square-metre property in 2011 under a foreign investment approval that required development. She left Australia one month after arrival and never returned to complete construction. The penalty marks the second foreign investor fined for land banking as the ATO pursues a broader compliance program.

What Li was required to do

Li purchased the Berwick property for $296,000 in 2011 on a subclass 600 tourist visa while still in China. Her foreign investment approval came with a condition: she had to build a dwelling on the land within four years. Justice Michael Hugh O’Bryan found that Li left Australia just one month after arrival and never returned. No building permit, planning permit, or construction activity was ever recorded against the property.

How the ATO discovered the breach

The ATO identified the breach through data matching and its land banking audit program. When the ATO contacted Li for an explanation, she initially responded but later stopped engaging. Justice O’Bryan noted that Li failed to respond on multiple occasions. When the ATO finally reached her, Li admitted she intended to resell the property because she lacked funds to build.

The court’s penalty and enforcement

Justice O’Bryan imposed a $508,000 penalty equal to double the capital gain Li would make on the property’s disposal, plus $50,757.70 in ATO legal costs. The court also imposed a 28-day freezing order to prevent her selling the property before the ruling. A charge was registered over the vacant land to secure payment. The ATO also pursued unpaid vacancy fees linked to another property Li held.

Broader enforcement against land banking

The ATO defines land banking as holding land for future gain instead of putting it to productive use through development. ATO Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Moltisanti said the fine sends a clear message that land banking limits housing supply for the Australian community. In 2024-25 alone, the ATO’s compliance program addressed 217 breaches of foreign investment rules and forced the disposal of 111 residential properties held in breach of conditions.

Final Thoughts

Foreign investors who buy Australian residential land face strict development obligations backed by substantial penalties and forced sale powers. The ATO is actively enforcing these rules to increase housing supply and protect Australia’s national interests.

FAQs

Why did the court fine Li $508,000 and not a different amount?

Justice O’Bryan imposed the maximum penalty for a single contravention: double the capital gain Li would make on the property sale, which equalled $508,000.

Can the ATO force Li to sell the property?

Yes. The ATO stated it will use its enforcement powers, including forced sale, to bring illegally land-banked property held by foreign investors back into the Australian housing market.

Is this the first time the ATO has fined a foreign investor for land banking?

No. Li is the second foreign investor fined for land banking. The ATO has been conducting a dedicated audit program to identify and enforce against this breach.

What is a land banking violation under Australian law?

Foreign investors who buy residential land must develop it within a timeframe set by their foreign investment approval. Holding the land vacant for future gain instead of developing it breaches that condition.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Danny Kontos

Co Founder

Danny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)