Meyka Pro banner
Global Market Insights

Bloomberg Ordered to Pay S$290,000 in Legal Costs After Defamation Loss on July 31

August 1, 2026
02:11 AM
3 min read

Key Points

Bloomberg and journalist ordered to pay S$290,000 in legal costs on July 30.

Each minister awarded S$145,000 covering trial, pre-trial, and post-trial work.

Court found December 2024 article defamatory by linking ministers to money laundering.

Total Bloomberg liability now S$460,000 across damages and costs combined.

Be the first to rate this article

Bloomberg and journalist Low De Wei have been ordered to pay S$290,000 in legal costs to Singapore Cabinet ministers K. Shanmugam and Tan See Leng following their defamation suit loss. Justice Audrey Lim awarded each minister S$145,000 in costs on July 30, two weeks after the court handed down S$230,000 in damages to each on July 14. The total financial exposure for Bloomberg now exceeds S$460,000 across both judgments.

The December 2024 article that sparked the lawsuit

Bloomberg published an article on December 12, 2024, titled “Singapore mansion deals are increasingly shrouded in secrecy.” The piece discussed luxury property transactions and mentioned the ministers’ specific real estate deals. Shanmugam’s former Queen Astrid Park home sold to UBS Trustees for S$88 million, and Tan’s Brizay Park bungalow purchase for nearly S$27.3 million were named in the article.

Why the court found the article defamatory

Justice Audrey Lim ruled on July 14 that the article linked the ministers’ transactions to secrecy, opacity, and money laundering, creating a defamatory impression. The judge found that journalist Low De Wei either knew certain information was false or published without caring whether it was true. Lim also found Bloomberg demonstrated malice by removing the paywall, making the article accessible to a wider audience.

How the S$145,000 cost award breaks down

Each minister received S$65,000 for 6.5 days of trial proceedings at S$10,000 per day. Pre-trial costs totaled S$50,000 per minister for written submission preparation. Post-trial costs of S$30,000 per minister covered a half-day hearing on May 22. Justice Audrey Lim applied guidance from costs guidelines for trials in determining the award.

Bloomberg’s failed defenses and what comes next

Bloomberg argued the article focused on broader trends in Singapore’s luxury property market rather than the ministers personally. The company also relied on a public interest defense known as the Reynolds defence in UK law. Justice Lim rejected both arguments, noting the Reynolds defence does not apply in Singapore law. Bloomberg declined to comment when contacted about the costs order.

Final Thoughts

Bloomberg faces S$460,000 in total financial liability across damages and legal costs. The case reinforces Singapore courts’ strict stance on defamation involving public figures and demonstrates the high cost of publishing unverified claims about named individuals.

FAQs

How much total money must Bloomberg pay after losing this defamation case?

Bloomberg must pay S$460,000 total: S$230,000 in damages to each minister and S$145,000 in legal costs to each minister, totaling S$290,000 in costs alone.

What was the December 2024 Bloomberg article about?

The article discussed secrecy in Singapore luxury property deals and named ministers Shanmugam and Tan See Leng’s specific real estate transactions, linking them to money laundering concerns.

Why did the judge find the article defamatory?

The judge ruled the article linked the ministers’ property transactions to secrecy, opacity, and money laundering, creating a false defamatory impression when read as a whole.

What defense did Bloomberg use and why did it fail?

Bloomberg claimed the article covered broader market trends and invoked the Reynolds public interest defense used in UK law, but Singapore courts do not recognize the Reynolds defence.

Disclaimer:

The content shared by Meyka AI PTY LTD is solely for research and informational purposes.  Meyka is not a financial advisory service, and the information provided should not be considered investment or trading advice.

About Author

Author

Danny Kontos

Co Founder

Danny Kontos has been a stock investor since 2007 and co-founded Meyka in 2023. He keeps a small, focused portfolio and only moves when the numbers are hard to argue with. He has waited years on a single position before. Before Meyka, he ran a web hosting company and a mortgage lending platform, so he knows what a well-run business actually looks like under the hood. This article did not come from a news cycle. It came from someone who has been watching this space for a long time.

What brings you to Meyka?

Pick what interests you most and we will get you started.

I'm here to read news

Find more articles like this one

I'm here to research stocks

Ask Meyka Analyst about any stock

I'm here to track my Portfolio

Get daily updates and alerts (coming March 2026)