Zomato Limited
Zomato Limited (ZOMATO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZOMATO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZOMATO.NS | ₹215.19 | +0.00% | 2T | 286.92 | ₹0.75 | N/A |
| ETERNAL.BO | ₹233.10 | -3.76% | 2.1T | 971.25 | ₹0.24 | N/A |
| ZOMATO.BO | ₹215.25 | +0.00% | 2T | 377.63 | ₹0.57 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.NS | ₹268.55 | -2.93% | 697.3B | -14.42 | -₹18.62 | N/A |
| SWIGGY.BO | ₹268.10 | -3.11% | 696.1B | -14.40 | -₹18.62 | N/A |
| NYKAA.NS | ₹239.65 | -1.82% | 686.2B | 489.08 | ₹0.49 | N/A |
| NYKAA.BO | ₹239.55 | -1.82% | 685.9B | 488.88 | ₹0.49 | N/A |
| AVL.NS | ₹489.20 | +1.84% | 63.2B | 57.22 | ₹8.55 | +0.22% |
| REDTAPE.NS | ₹112.95 | -1.94% | 62.4B | 29.41 | ₹3.84 | +0.66% |
| RTNINDIA.BO | ₹27.05 | -2.45% | 37.4B | -9.08 | -₹2.98 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZOMATO.NS vs ETERNAL.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ETERNAL.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ETERNAL.BO trades at ₹233.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ETERNAL.BO's P/E ratio is 971.25. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ETERNAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to ETERNAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ETERNAL.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs ZOMATO.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ZOMATO.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ZOMATO.BO trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ZOMATO.BO's P/E ratio is 377.63. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZOMATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to ZOMATO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ZOMATO.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs SWIGGY.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, SWIGGY.NS has a market cap of 697.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while SWIGGY.NS trades at ₹268.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas SWIGGY.NS's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWIGGY.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to SWIGGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check SWIGGY.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs SWIGGY.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, SWIGGY.BO has a market cap of 696.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while SWIGGY.BO trades at ₹268.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas SWIGGY.BO's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SWIGGY.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to SWIGGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check SWIGGY.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs NYKAA.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, NYKAA.NS has a market cap of 686.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while NYKAA.NS trades at ₹239.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas NYKAA.NS's P/E ratio is 489.08. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYKAA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to NYKAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check NYKAA.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs NYKAA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, NYKAA.BO has a market cap of 685.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while NYKAA.BO trades at ₹239.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas NYKAA.BO's P/E ratio is 488.88. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYKAA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to NYKAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check NYKAA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs AVL.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, AVL.NS has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while AVL.NS trades at ₹489.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas AVL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.22. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to AVL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check AVL.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs REDTAPE.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, REDTAPE.NS has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while REDTAPE.NS trades at ₹112.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas REDTAPE.NS's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REDTAPE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to REDTAPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check REDTAPE.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs RTNINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, RTNINDIA.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while RTNINDIA.BO trades at ₹27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas RTNINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RTNINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check RTNINDIA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs EMIL.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, EMIL.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while EMIL.NS trades at ₹91.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas EMIL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to EMIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check EMIL.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs EMIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, EMIL.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while EMIL.BO trades at ₹91.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas EMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.47. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to EMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check EMIL.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs GARGI.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, GARGI.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while GARGI.BO trades at ₹782.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas GARGI.BO's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GARGI.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to GARGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check GARGI.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs LOGICA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, LOGICA.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while LOGICA.BO trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas LOGICA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.96. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOGICA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to LOGICA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check LOGICA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs KDML.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, KDML.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while KDML.BO trades at ₹132.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas KDML.BO's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDML.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to KDML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check KDML.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs PANORAMA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, PANORAMA.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while PANORAMA.BO trades at ₹36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas PANORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PANORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to PANORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check PANORAMA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs COMPEAU.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, COMPEAU.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while COMPEAU.BO trades at ₹337.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas COMPEAU.BO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COMPEAU.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to COMPEAU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check COMPEAU.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs AAYUSH.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, AAYUSH.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while AAYUSH.BO trades at ₹28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas AAYUSH.BO's P/E ratio is 31.41. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAYUSH.BO's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to AAYUSH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check AAYUSH.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs LLOYDS.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, LLOYDS.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while LLOYDS.NS trades at ₹43.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas LLOYDS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LLOYDS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check LLOYDS.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs PRAXIS.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, PRAXIS.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while PRAXIS.NS trades at ₹5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas PRAXIS.NS's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAXIS.NS's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check PRAXIS.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs PRAXIS.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, PRAXIS.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while PRAXIS.BO trades at ₹5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas PRAXIS.BO's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAXIS.BO's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check PRAXIS.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs KEMP.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, KEMP.BO has a market cap of 987.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while KEMP.BO trades at ₹913.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas KEMP.BO's P/E ratio is -62.77. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEMP.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to KEMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check KEMP.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs ISFT.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ISFT.BO has a market cap of 899.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ISFT.BO trades at ₹55.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ISFT.BO's P/E ratio is 7.20. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISFT.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to ISFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ISFT.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs ISFT.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ISFT.NS has a market cap of 898.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ISFT.NS trades at ₹55.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ISFT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ISFT.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to ISFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ISFT.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs DIGIDRIVE.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, DIGIDRIVE.NS has a market cap of 651.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while DIGIDRIVE.NS trades at ₹16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas DIGIDRIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to DIGIDRIVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check DIGIDRIVE.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs ARCHIES.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ARCHIES.NS has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ARCHIES.NS trades at ₹11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ARCHIES.NS's P/E ratio is -35.39. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARCHIES.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to ARCHIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ARCHIES.NS's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs ARCHIES.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, ARCHIES.BO has a market cap of 390.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while ARCHIES.BO trades at ₹11.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas ARCHIES.BO's P/E ratio is -37.32. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ARCHIES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to ARCHIES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check ARCHIES.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs PACE.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, PACE.BO has a market cap of 295M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while PACE.BO trades at ₹13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas PACE.BO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PACE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to PACE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check PACE.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs DUKEOFS.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, DUKEOFS.BO has a market cap of 251.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while DUKEOFS.BO trades at ₹25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas DUKEOFS.BO's P/E ratio is -44.81. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DUKEOFS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to DUKEOFS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check DUKEOFS.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs UHZAVERI.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, UHZAVERI.BO has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while UHZAVERI.BO trades at ₹12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas UHZAVERI.BO's P/E ratio is -315.25. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UHZAVERI.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to UHZAVERI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check UHZAVERI.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs DARSHANORNA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, DARSHANORNA.BO has a market cap of 121.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while DARSHANORNA.BO trades at ₹2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas DARSHANORNA.BO's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DARSHANORNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to DARSHANORNA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check DARSHANORNA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs RAJPUTANA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, RAJPUTANA.BO has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while RAJPUTANA.BO trades at ₹31.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas RAJPUTANA.BO's P/E ratio is 77.87. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJPUTANA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to RAJPUTANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check RAJPUTANA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs DDIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, DDIL.BO has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while DDIL.BO trades at ₹1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas DDIL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DDIL.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to DDIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check DDIL.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs HARIAEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, HARIAEXPO.BO has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while HARIAEXPO.BO trades at ₹7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas HARIAEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 61.25. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HARIAEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to HARIAEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check HARIAEXPO.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs VEERKRUPA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, VEERKRUPA.BO has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while VEERKRUPA.BO trades at ₹0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas VEERKRUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.00. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VEERKRUPA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to VEERKRUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check VEERKRUPA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs MHSGRMS.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, MHSGRMS.BO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while MHSGRMS.BO trades at ₹6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas MHSGRMS.BO's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHSGRMS.BO's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to MHSGRMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check MHSGRMS.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs JSHL.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, JSHL.BO has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while JSHL.BO trades at ₹8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas JSHL.BO's P/E ratio is -11.88. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JSHL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to JSHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check JSHL.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs SPECTRA.BO Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, SPECTRA.BO has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while SPECTRA.BO trades at ₹5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas SPECTRA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SPECTRA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is more volatile compared to SPECTRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check SPECTRA.BO's competition here
ZOMATO.NS vs PRAXIS-RE.NS Comparison April 2026
ZOMATO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZOMATO.NS stands at 2T. In comparison, PRAXIS-RE.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZOMATO.NS is priced at ₹215.19, while PRAXIS-RE.NS trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZOMATO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 286.92, whereas PRAXIS-RE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZOMATO.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZOMATO.NS is less volatile compared to PRAXIS-RE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZOMATO.NS.Check PRAXIS-RE.NS's competition here