zooplus SE

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, WMT.SW has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while WMT.SW trades at CHF 107.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas WMT.SW's P/E ratio is 23.70. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to WMT.SW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW and WMT.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, BABA.SW has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while BABA.SW trades at CHF 166.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas BABA.SW's P/E ratio is 97.08. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to BABA.SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW is less volatile compared to BABA.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZO1.SW.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, EBAY.SW has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while EBAY.SW trades at CHF 39.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas EBAY.SW's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to EBAY.SW's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW and EBAY.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, ZAL.SW has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while ZAL.SW trades at CHF 42.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas ZAL.SW's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to ZAL.SW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW and ZAL.SW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, AVOL.SW has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while AVOL.SW trades at CHF 44.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas AVOL.SW's P/E ratio is 64.82. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to AVOL.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW is less volatile compared to AVOL.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZO1.SW.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, DUFN.SW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while DUFN.SW trades at CHF 30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas DUFN.SW's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to DUFN.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW is less volatile compared to DUFN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZO1.SW.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, CEC.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while CEC.SW trades at CHF 5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas CEC.SW's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to CEC.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZO1.SW has daily volatility of 0.00 and CEC.SW has daily volatility of N/A.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, VALN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while VALN.SW trades at CHF 259.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas VALN.SW's P/E ratio is 169.61. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to VALN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW is less volatile compared to VALN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZO1.SW.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, MOZN.SW has a market cap of 503.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while MOZN.SW trades at CHF 11.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas MOZN.SW's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to MOZN.SW's ROE of +9.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ZO1.SW is less volatile compared to MOZN.SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZO1.SW.

ZO1.SW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZO1.SW stands at 766M. In comparison, SNH.SW has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ZO1.SW is priced at CHF 105.60, while SNH.SW trades at CHF 0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZO1.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -46.79, whereas SNH.SW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ZO1.SW's ROE is -0.13%, compared to SNH.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZO1.SW has daily volatility of 0.00 and SNH.SW has daily volatility of N/A.