Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, WMT.SW has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while WMT.SW trades at CHF 95.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas WMT.SW's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WMT.SW's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to WMT.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check WMT.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, BABA.SW has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while BABA.SW trades at CHF 166.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas BABA.SW's P/E ratio is 97.08. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BABA.SW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to BABA.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check BABA.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, EBAY.SW has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while EBAY.SW trades at CHF 39.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas EBAY.SW's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EBAY.SW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to EBAY.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check EBAY.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, AVOL.SW has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while AVOL.SW trades at CHF 47.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas AVOL.SW's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVOL.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to AVOL.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check AVOL.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, DUFN.SW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while DUFN.SW trades at CHF 30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas DUFN.SW's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUFN.SW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to DUFN.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check DUFN.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, ZAL.SW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while ZAL.SW trades at CHF 21.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ZAL.SW's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAL.SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to ZAL.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check ZAL.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, CEC.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while CEC.SW trades at CHF 5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas CEC.SW's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CEC.SW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to CEC.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check CEC.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, VALN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while VALN.SW trades at CHF 259.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas VALN.SW's P/E ratio is 169.61. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VALN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to VALN.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check VALN.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, ZO1.SW has a market cap of 766M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while ZO1.SW trades at CHF 105.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas ZO1.SW's P/E ratio is -46.79. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZO1.SW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to ZO1.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check ZO1.SW's competition here

Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. (SIX: SNH.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SNH.SW stands at 374.1M. In comparison, VILN.SW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SNH.SW is priced at CHF 0.09 on the SIX, while VILN.SW trades at CHF 605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SNH.SW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.44, whereas VILN.SW's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, SNH.SW's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VILN.SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SNH.SW is not fully comparable compared to VILN.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SNH.SW.Check VILN.SW's competition here