Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, WMT.SW has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while WMT.SW trades at CHF 114.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas WMT.SW's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WMT.SW's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is less volatile compared to WMT.SW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check WMT.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, EBAY.SW has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while EBAY.SW trades at CHF 39.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas EBAY.SW's P/E ratio is -18.47. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EBAY.SW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is more volatile compared to EBAY.SW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check EBAY.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, AVOL.SW has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while AVOL.SW trades at CHF 47.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas AVOL.SW's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVOL.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is less volatile compared to AVOL.SW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check AVOL.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, DUFN.SW has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while DUFN.SW trades at CHF 30.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas DUFN.SW's P/E ratio is 51.88. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUFN.SW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is less volatile compared to DUFN.SW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check DUFN.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, ZAL.SW has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while ZAL.SW trades at CHF 22.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas ZAL.SW's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZAL.SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is less volatile compared to ZAL.SW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check ZAL.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, CEC.SW has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while CEC.SW trades at CHF 5.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas CEC.SW's P/E ratio is 40.80. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CEC.SW's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is not fully comparable compared to CEC.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check CEC.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, VALN.SW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while VALN.SW trades at CHF 259.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas VALN.SW's P/E ratio is 169.61. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VALN.SW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is more volatile compared to VALN.SW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check VALN.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, ZO1.SW has a market cap of 766M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while ZO1.SW trades at CHF 105.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas ZO1.SW's P/E ratio is -46.79. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZO1.SW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is more volatile compared to ZO1.SW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check ZO1.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, SNH.SW has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while SNH.SW trades at CHF 0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas SNH.SW's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SNH.SW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is not fully comparable compared to SNH.SW. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check SNH.SW's competition here

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (SIX: BABA.SW) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the SIX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BABA.SW stands at 165.2B. In comparison, VILN.SW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BABA.SW is priced at CHF 166.00 on the SIX, while VILN.SW trades at CHF 605.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BABA.SW currently has a P/E ratio of 97.08, whereas VILN.SW's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, BABA.SW's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VILN.SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BABA.SW is more volatile compared to VILN.SW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BABA.SW.Check VILN.SW's competition here