ZoomAway Technologies Inc.
ZoomAway Technologies Inc. (ZMWYF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZMWYF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZMWYF | $0.03 | +0.00% | 992.7K | -0.63 | -$0.04 | N/A |
| TRPCF | $62.50 | +0.00% | 40.8B | 18.22 | $3.43 | +0.48% |
| AMADF | $82.28 | -2.05% | 36.3B | 24.27 | $3.39 | +1.74% |
| AMADY | $80.92 | -2.02% | 34.9B | 23.71 | $3.39 | +1.41% |
| TNGCF | $2.30 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 19.17 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DRTGF | $22.68 | -0.02% | 4.6B | 8.16 | $2.78 | +0.86% |
| TUIFF | $8.94 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 7.33 | $1.22 | N/A |
| LGDDF | $22.68 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 12.96 | $1.75 | +3.35% |
| FGETF | $8.10 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 23.82 | $0.34 | +3.42% |
| TNLIY | $6.81 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 20.03 | $0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZMWYF vs TRPCF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while TRPCF trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check TRPCF's competition here
ZMWYF vs AMADF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while AMADF trades at $82.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and AMADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMADF's competition here
ZMWYF vs AMADY Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while AMADY trades at $80.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check AMADY's competition here
ZMWYF vs TNGCF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while TNGCF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and TNGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNGCF's competition here
ZMWYF vs DRTGF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while DRTGF trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and DRTGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRTGF's competition here
ZMWYF vs TUIFF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while TUIFF trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to TUIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check TUIFF's competition here
ZMWYF vs LGDDF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while LGDDF trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to LGDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check LGDDF's competition here
ZMWYF vs FGETF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, FGETF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while FGETF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas FGETF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FGETF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to FGETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check FGETF's competition here
ZMWYF vs TNLIY Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while TNLIY trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and TNLIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNLIY's competition here
ZMWYF vs CTMLF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while CTMLF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to CTMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check CTMLF's competition here
ZMWYF vs EDDRF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while EDDRF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to EDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check EDDRF's competition here
ZMWYF vs WEBJF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while WEBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check WEBJF's competition here
ZMWYF vs WEJTY Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while WEJTY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to WEJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check WEJTY's competition here
ZMWYF vs OOBHF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 641.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while OOBHF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to OOBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check OOBHF's competition here
ZMWYF vs EOVBF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check EOVBF's competition here
ZMWYF vs LSMNF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while LSMNF trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to LSMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check LSMNF's competition here
ZMWYF vs HSWLF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 189.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while HSWLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and HSWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSWLF's competition here
ZMWYF vs TRZBF Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 80.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while TRZBF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check TRZBF's competition here
ZMWYF vs HWGG Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while HWGG trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -235.00. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and HWGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWGG's competition here
ZMWYF vs ONVC Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while ONVC trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF is less volatile compared to ONVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZMWYF.Check ONVC's competition here
ZMWYF vs NNAX Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 330.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and NNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNAX's competition here
ZMWYF vs CDNO Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 158.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and CDNO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDNO's competition here
ZMWYF vs GWYT Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and GWYT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GWYT's competition here
ZMWYF vs WESC Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WESC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and WESC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WESC's competition here
ZMWYF vs ARMV Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while ARMV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and ARMV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARMV's competition here
ZMWYF vs OHTR Comparison July 2025
ZMWYF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZMWYF stands at 992.7K. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZMWYF is priced at $0.03, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZMWYF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.63, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZMWYF's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZMWYF and OHTR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OHTR's competition here