Tongcheng Travel Holdings Limited
Tongcheng Travel Holdings Limited (TNGCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNGCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNGCF | $2.80 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 18.67 | $0.15 | N/A |
| TRPCF | $52.11 | +0.00% | 34.1B | 7.45 | $6.99 | N/A |
| AMADY | $57.70 | -2.83% | 24.9B | 16.35 | $3.53 | +2.87% |
| AMADF | $56.45 | -6.01% | 24.3B | 15.90 | $3.55 | +2.94% |
| TUIFF | $8.00 | -2.86% | 4.1B | 5.44 | $1.47 | +1.49% |
| LGDDF | $21.75 | +1.35% | 3.1B | 12.36 | $1.76 | +3.49% |
| DRTGF | $15.27 | -2.15% | 2.8B | 4.82 | $3.17 | +1.43% |
| FGETF | $8.50 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 23.61 | $0.36 | +3.27% |
| TNLIY | $6.30 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 14.00 | $0.45 | N/A |
| CTMLF | $9.18 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 31.66 | $0.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TNGCF vs TRPCF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while TRPCF trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check TRPCF's competition here
TNGCF vs AMADY Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while AMADY trades at $57.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check AMADY's competition here
TNGCF vs AMADF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while AMADF trades at $56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to AMADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check AMADF's competition here
TNGCF vs TUIFF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while TUIFF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and TUIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUIFF's competition here
TNGCF vs LGDDF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while LGDDF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and LGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGDDF's competition here
TNGCF vs DRTGF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while DRTGF trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 4.82. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to DRTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check DRTGF's competition here
TNGCF vs FGETF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FGETF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while FGETF trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas FGETF's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to FGETF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to FGETF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check FGETF's competition here
TNGCF vs TNLIY Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while TNLIY trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to TNLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check TNLIY's competition here
TNGCF vs CTMLF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while CTMLF trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to CTMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check CTMLF's competition here
TNGCF vs WEJTY Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while WEJTY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 305.00. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEJTY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and WEJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEJTY's competition here
TNGCF vs EDDRF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 442.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while EDDRF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and EDDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDDRF's competition here
TNGCF vs WEBJF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 336.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while WEBJF trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check WEBJF's competition here
TNGCF vs OOBHF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while OOBHF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to OOBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check OOBHF's competition here
TNGCF vs EOVBF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check EOVBF's competition here
TNGCF vs LSMNF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while LSMNF trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to LSMNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check LSMNF's competition here
TNGCF vs HSWLF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while HSWLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and HSWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSWLF's competition here
TNGCF vs TRZBF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 86.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while TRZBF trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRZBF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check TRZBF's competition here
TNGCF vs ONVC Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 32.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while ONVC trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and ONVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONVC's competition here
TNGCF vs HWGG Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while HWGG trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -78.00. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to HWGG's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to HWGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check HWGG's competition here
TNGCF vs ZMWYF Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and ZMWYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMWYF's competition here
TNGCF vs CDNO Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 437K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check CDNO's competition here
TNGCF vs NNAX Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 247.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and NNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNAX's competition here
TNGCF vs MONDQ Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MONDQ has a market cap of 174.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while MONDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas MONDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to MONDQ's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to MONDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check MONDQ's competition here
TNGCF vs WESC Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to WESC's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF and WESC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WESC's competition here
TNGCF vs ARMV Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while ARMV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to ARMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check ARMV's competition here
TNGCF vs GWYT Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check GWYT's competition here
TNGCF vs OHTR Comparison April 2026
TNGCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNGCF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TNGCF is priced at $2.80, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNGCF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.67, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNGCF's ROE is N/A, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNGCF is less volatile compared to OHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNGCF.Check OHTR's competition here