Flight Centre Travel Group Limited
Flight Centre Travel Group Limited (FGETF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGETF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGETF | $7.25 | +0.00% | 1.5B | 20.14 | $0.36 | +3.79% |
| TRPCF | $50.16 | +0.00% | 32.3B | 7.14 | $7.02 | N/A |
| AMADF | $61.24 | +4.65% | 26.4B | 17.30 | $3.54 | +2.55% |
| AMADY | $60.92 | +3.06% | 26.2B | 16.96 | $3.58 | +2.73% |
| TNGCF | $2.80 | +0.00% | 6.6B | 18.67 | $0.15 | N/A |
| TUIFF | $7.55 | +0.00% | 3.8B | 4.97 | $1.52 | +1.57% |
| LGDDF | $20.45 | +0.00% | 2.9B | 11.62 | $1.76 | +3.85% |
| DRTGF | $14.57 | +1.18% | 2.6B | 4.60 | $3.17 | +1.53% |
| WEBJF | $5.11 | +449.46% | 1.8B | 51.10 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TNLIY | $6.01 | +2.39% | 1.1B | 11.56 | $0.52 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FGETF vs TRPCF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while TRPCF trades at $50.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TRPCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRPCF's competition here
FGETF vs AMADF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while AMADF trades at $61.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to AMADF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check AMADF's competition here
FGETF vs AMADY Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while AMADY trades at $60.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check AMADY's competition here
FGETF vs TNGCF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while TNGCF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TNGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNGCF's competition here
FGETF vs TUIFF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while TUIFF trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TUIFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TUIFF's competition here
FGETF vs LGDDF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while LGDDF trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and LGDDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LGDDF's competition here
FGETF vs DRTGF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while DRTGF trades at $14.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to DRTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check DRTGF's competition here
FGETF vs WEBJF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEBJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while WEBJF trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas WEBJF's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEBJF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to WEBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check WEBJF's competition here
FGETF vs TNLIY Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while TNLIY trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and TNLIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TNLIY's competition here
FGETF vs WEJTY Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while WEJTY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 305.00. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and WEJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEJTY's competition here
FGETF vs EDEMY Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EDEMY has a market cap of 421.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while EDEMY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas EDEMY's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDEMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and EDEMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDEMY's competition here
FGETF vs EDDRF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 406.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while EDDRF trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and EDDRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EDDRF's competition here
FGETF vs OOBHF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 405.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while OOBHF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and OOBHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OOBHF's competition here
FGETF vs EOVBF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and EOVBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EOVBF's competition here
FGETF vs LSMNF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while LSMNF trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and LSMNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LSMNF's competition here
FGETF vs HSWLF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 154.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while HSWLF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and HSWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSWLF's competition here
FGETF vs HWGG Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while HWGG trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -410.00. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and HWGG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HWGG's competition here
FGETF vs TRZBF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while TRZBF trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check TRZBF's competition here
FGETF vs ONVC Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while ONVC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ONVC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ONVC's competition here
FGETF vs CTMLF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while CTMLF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and CTMLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTMLF's competition here
FGETF vs ZMWYF Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ZMWYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZMWYF's competition here
FGETF vs NNAX Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 272.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and NNAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNAX's competition here
FGETF vs MONDQ Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MONDQ has a market cap of 174.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while MONDQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas MONDQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MONDQ's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to MONDQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check MONDQ's competition here
FGETF vs CDNO Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 119.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check CDNO's competition here
FGETF vs WESC Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WESC's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and WESC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WESC's competition here
FGETF vs ARMV Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while ARMV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF and ARMV have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARMV's competition here
FGETF vs GWYT Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 1.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check GWYT's competition here
FGETF vs OHTR Comparison May 2026
FGETF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGETF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGETF is priced at $7.25, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGETF currently has a P/E ratio of 20.14, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGETF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGETF is less volatile compared to OHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGETF.Check OHTR's competition here