YASKAWA Electric Corporation
YASKAWA Electric Corporation YASKY Peers
See (YASKY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YASKY | $45.15 | -1.86% | 2.9B | 14.90 | $3.03 | N/A |
| ABBNY | $57.36 | -0.30% | 105.5B | 25.61 | $2.24 | +1.72% |
| ABLZF | $56.76 | -1.01% | 103.1B | 25.34 | $2.24 | +1.80% |
| DLEGF | $4.35 | N/A | 54.3B | 87.00 | $0.05 | +0.32% |
| MIELF | $20.75 | -3.44% | 43.1B | 19.21 | $1.08 | +1.63% |
| MIELY | $40.59 | -1.90% | 42.2B | 18.62 | $2.18 | +0.81% |
| LGRDY | $24.69 | +0.44% | 32.4B | 24.20 | $1.02 | +1.95% |
| LGRVF | $123.11 | +0.25% | 32.3B | 24.14 | $5.10 | +1.63% |
| PRYMF | $68.05 | -1.36% | 19.5B | 25.30 | $2.69 | +1.15% |
| PRYMY | $33.05 | -1.61% | 19B | 24.12 | $1.37 | +1.20% |
Stock Comparison
YASKY vs ABBNY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 105.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ABBNY trades at $57.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 25.61. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ABLZF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 103.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ABLZF trades at $56.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 25.34. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs DLEGF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while DLEGF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 87.00. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs MIELF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while MIELF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs MIELY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while MIELY trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LGRDY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LGRDY trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LGRVF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LGRVF trades at $123.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs PRYMF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while PRYMF trades at $68.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 25.30. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs PRYMY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while PRYMY trades at $33.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs OSAGY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FELTF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FELTF trades at $44.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FELTY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FELTY trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs YASKF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while YASKF trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs PHPPY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while PHPPY trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs OSAGF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs NEXNY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while NEXNY trades at $57.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs NXPRF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while NXPRF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs NRKBF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while NRKBF trades at $78.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FUWAF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FUWAF trades at $48.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FUWAY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FUWAY trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs SFFYF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while SFFYF trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LMHDF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LGYRF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GYUAF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LDGYY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LDGYY trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs HMDPF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 942.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while HMDPF trades at $79.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ALFNF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 884.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ALFNF trades at $40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -29.28. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs VARGF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs HOIEF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs VLXGF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 597.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while VLXGF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs EFLVF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CBLNF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CBLNY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 557.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs WSPCF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs RNRTY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ZMTBY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs COSXF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while COSXF trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 52.13. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs XPPLF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 277.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while XPPLF trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ABHBY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CPWHF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 198.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CPWHF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CRPHY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 193.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CRPHY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs NVNXF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while NVNXF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs PCELF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 149.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while PCELF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -18.46. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TGEN Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TGEN trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FCELB Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 128.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FCELB trades at $312.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1015.23. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs AFGYF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 125.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while AFGYF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TNPOF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs VARTY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ILIKF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ILIKF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ONMBF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TNTLF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs DIALF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while DIALF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ARTGF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GELNF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 41.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs EXROF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while EXROF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs NHHHF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while NHHHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs QBAK Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while QBAK trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs IHGP Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs MNSEF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while MNSEF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LPSIF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ORBT Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ORBT trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs SSCFF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs DFEL Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while DFEL trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ASTO Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ASTO trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs HYEG Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while HYEG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LNNNF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GPGC Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CECBF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LPENF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs EGTYF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while EGTYF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs IDGC Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ENEVF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs OZSC Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GBLTF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs ZAIRF Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CAPC Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CAPC trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TOGI Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs KRFG Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LNNNY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs BSTK Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 594.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs PSTO Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 357.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while PSTO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs USLG Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 337K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while USLG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs IMHCW Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs AIPG Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 40.2K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while AIPG trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs DCFCQ Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 29.2K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while DCFCQ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TRUL Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 21.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs EIPC Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs DLYT Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs CHGI Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs FDEI Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs LSCG Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GNAL Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GCHT Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs SGLN Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 5.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs USGA Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs GCLL Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs HLXW Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs XNNHQ Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.
YASKY vs TMGY Comparison
YASKY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, YASKY stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, YASKY is priced at $45.15, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
YASKY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.90, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, YASKY's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, YASKY is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for YASKY.