Qualstar Corporation (QBAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 194.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ABBNY trades at $106.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ABBNY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 192.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ABLZF trades at $105.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ABLZF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 140.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while DLEGF trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 161.30. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check DLEGF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while MIELF trades at $39.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check MIELF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while MIELY trades at $77.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check MIELY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PRYMF trades at $176.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PRYMF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PRYMY trades at $87.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PRYMY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LGRVF trades at $178.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LGRVF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LGRDY trades at $34.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LGRDY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FUWAY trades at $166.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 51.42. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check FUWAY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FUWAF trades at $315.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 48.76. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check FUWAF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FELTY trades at $24.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK and FELTY have similar daily volatility (1.38).Check FELTY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while YASKF trades at $46.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 56.24. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check YASKF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FELTF trades at $72.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check FELTF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while NRKBF trades at $126.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 29.23. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check NRKBF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while NEXNY trades at $91.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 33.04. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check NEXNY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while NXPRF trades at $180.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check NXPRF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while OSAGF trades at $62.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -172.86. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check OSAGF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while YASKY trades at $90.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 53.13. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check YASKY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PHPPY trades at $12.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PHPPY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check OSAGY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GYUAF trades at $31.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GYUAF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LMHDF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while HMDPF trades at $233.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 58.56. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check HMDPF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while SFFYF trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 12.85. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check SFFYF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while OZSC trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check OZSC's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CRPHY trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -34.84. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CRPHY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CPWHF trades at $10.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -33.31. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CPWHF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LGYRF trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is 44.76. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LGYRF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while VLXGF trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check VLXGF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LDGYY trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LDGYY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 986M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CBLNY trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CBLNY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while VARGF trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VARGF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check VARGF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 824.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while HOIEF trades at $16.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check HOIEF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 698.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CBLNF trades at $42.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CBLNF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of +1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check EFLVF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 557M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while RNRTY trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check RNRTY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 458.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while XPPLF trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -21.23. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check XPPLF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 343.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while COSXF trades at $7.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is -139.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COSXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check COSXF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 266M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check WSPCF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ALFNF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -1115.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ALFNF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 231.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ABHBY trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is -533.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ABHBY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PCELF trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PCELF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while DIALF trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check DIALF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ZMTBY trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ZMTBY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 142.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FCELB trades at $445.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1477.27. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check FCELB's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while NVNXF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check NVNXF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, TNPOF has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while TNPOF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas TNPOF's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TNPOF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to TNPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check TNPOF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ILIKF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -8.42. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ILIKF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ONMBF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check TNTLF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 59.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GELNF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GELNF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LCHIF has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LCHIF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LCHIF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LCHIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LCHIF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ORBT trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ORBT's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while NHHHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check NHHHF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LPSIF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -54.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LPSIF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, UNEH has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while UNEH trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas UNEH's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UNEH's ROE of -2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to UNEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check UNEH's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, HLRTF has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while HLRTF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas HLRTF's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLRTF's ROE of +2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to HLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check HLRTF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while VARTY trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VARTY's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check VARTY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while HYEG trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check HYEG's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ARTGF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ARTGF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CAPC trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAPC's ROE of +694.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CAPC's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PWDY has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PWDY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PWDY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWDY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to PWDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PWDY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while AIPG trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +934.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check AIPG's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ASTO trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ASTO's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while DFEL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DFEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check DFEL's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while TOGI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check TOGI's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LNNNF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GPGC trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GPGC's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GPGC's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while EGTYF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check EGTYF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LPENF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LPENF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ENEVF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GBLTF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PSTO trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSTO's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PSTO's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while BSTK trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check BSTK's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 990.7K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while ZAIRF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check ZAIRF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LNNNY's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 847.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while IHGP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check IHGP's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while SGLN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check SGLN's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, PITWF has a market cap of 542.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while PITWF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas PITWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PITWF's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to PITWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check PITWF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 265.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while HLXW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check HLXW's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 253K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while IDGC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check IDGC's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 239.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while MNSEF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check MNSEF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check IMHCW's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 57.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while EXROF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXROF's ROE of +7.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check EXROF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 48.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GNAL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GNAL's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 21.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while LSCG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check LSCG's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while EIPC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check EIPC's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 18.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check XNNHQ's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 15.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check SSCFF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while FDEI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check FDEI's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while USLG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check USLG's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check AXPWQ's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CECBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CECBF's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while DLYT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check DLYT's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while USGA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check USGA's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while CHGI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check CHGI's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while TRUL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is more volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check TRUL's competition here

QBAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QBAK stands at 66.1M. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QBAK is priced at $3.90, while GCLL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QBAK currently has a P/E ratio of -14.43, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBAK's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, QBAK is less volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBAK.Check GCLL's competition here