XTGlobal Infotech Ltd.
XTGlobal Infotech Ltd. (XTGLOBAL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XTGLOBAL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XTGLOBAL.BO | ₹29.36 | +1.94% | 3.8B | 39.75 | ₹0.71 | +0.18% |
| TCS.NS | ₹2,677.90 | -0.31% | 9.7T | 20.31 | ₹131.75 | +4.07% |
| TCS.BO | ₹2,680.45 | -0.23% | 9.7T | 20.29 | ₹131.88 | +4.07% |
| INFY.BO | ₹1,369.60 | +1.25% | 5.4T | 19.05 | ₹69.73 | +3.39% |
| INFY.NS | ₹1,370.50 | +1.28% | 5.4T | 19.05 | ₹69.69 | +3.39% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,450.40 | +0.93% | 3.9T | 23.52 | ₹60.64 | +3.79% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,450.40 | +0.97% | 3.9T | 23.53 | ₹60.62 | +3.79% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹211.25 | +0.62% | 2.2T | 16.32 | ₹12.62 | +5.34% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹211.21 | +0.64% | 2.2T | 16.33 | ₹12.61 | +5.34% |
| LTIM.NS | ₹4,959.50 | +1.43% | 1.4T | 30.13 | ₹160.38 | +1.39% |
Stock Comparison
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TCS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 9.7T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,677.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TCS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TCS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 9.7T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,680.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TCS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs INFY.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,369.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check INFY.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs INFY.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 5.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,370.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check INFY.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,450.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,450.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs WIPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹211.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 16.32. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs WIPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 2.2T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹211.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs LTIM.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,959.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs LTIM.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹4,964.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check LTIM.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TECHM.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,480.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TECHM.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,479.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TECHM.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 778.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹5,271.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 778.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹5,266.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 45.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 440.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,376.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 440.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,379.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs COFORGE.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 432.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,361.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 38.45. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs COFORGE.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 432.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,360.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs LTTS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,446.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs LTTS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 364.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,441.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.98. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs HEXT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 306.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹539.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TATATECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 243.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹601.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TATATECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 243.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹601.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.95. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs KPITTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KPITTECH.BO has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while KPITTECH.BO trades at ₹847.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas KPITTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KPITTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check KPITTECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 221.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹847.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹254.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 192B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹254.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs FSL.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while FSL.NS trades at ₹257.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check FSL.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs FSL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 166B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while FSL.BO trades at ₹257.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check FSL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ECLERX.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 163.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹3,590.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ECLERX.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 160.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹3,580.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹569.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹569.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs BSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 105.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹385.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs BSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹385.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.71. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹287.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹287.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹387.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹386.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MASTEK.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,712.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MASTEK.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,713.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹847.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹842.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹315.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.71. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹314.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CAMS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹721.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.44. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CAMS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹722.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.51. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,339.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,332.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹2,638.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 63.90. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹611.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹611.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 27.06. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹719.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -24.43. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹725.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -24.41. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹157.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.02. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹157.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹1,340.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 58.05. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SILVERTUC.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹1,340.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SASKEN.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹1,207.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SASKEN.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹1,206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,187.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹26.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs AURUM.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -55.83. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs AURUM.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹177.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -55.72. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹323.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 28.19. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹826.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹823.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MMWL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 266.25. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DSSL.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹964.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DSSL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹962.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs BGDL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BGDL.BO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while BGDL.BO trades at ₹99.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas BGDL.BO's P/E ratio is 362.14. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BGDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to BGDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check BGDL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹67.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 62.55. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹217.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 24.82. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹218.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ADSL.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹127.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ADSL.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹126.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.31. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹295.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹296.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs NINSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹327.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs NINSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹327.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is more volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹383.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.97. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹391.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 24.96. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is -29.20. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is -29.19. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SIGMA.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹40.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs SIGMA.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹40.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.10. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹125.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹91.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs INSPIRISYS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹91.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ASMS.BO Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASMS.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ASMS.BO trades at ₹11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ASMS.BO's P/E ratio is 100.27. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASMS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ASMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ASMS.BO's competition here
XTGLOBAL.BO vs ASMS.NS Comparison February 2026
XTGLOBAL.BO plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XTGLOBAL.BO stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASMS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XTGLOBAL.BO is priced at ₹29.36, while ASMS.NS trades at ₹11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XTGLOBAL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ASMS.NS's P/E ratio is 99.45. In terms of profitability, XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ASMS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XTGLOBAL.BO is less volatile compared to ASMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XTGLOBAL.BO.Check ASMS.NS's competition here