LTM Limited
LTM Limited (LTM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LTM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM.NS | ₹4,282.30 | -5.50% | 1.3T | 25.34 | ₹169.02 | N/A |
| TCS.BO | ₹2,402.20 | -4.77% | 8.7T | 17.66 | ₹136.01 | +4.55% |
| TCS.NS | ₹2,396.90 | -4.95% | 8.7T | 17.62 | ₹136.06 | +4.55% |
| INFY.BO | ₹1,154.45 | -7.09% | 4.7T | 16.56 | ₹69.73 | +3.90% |
| INFY.NS | ₹1,154.60 | -6.93% | 4.7T | 15.41 | ₹74.93 | +3.90% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,203.25 | -5.79% | 3.3T | 19.63 | ₹61.31 | +4.99% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,203.20 | -5.82% | 3.3T | 19.62 | ₹61.32 | +4.99% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹199.40 | -1.75% | 2.1T | 15.88 | ₹12.56 | +5.52% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹199.36 | -1.68% | 2.1T | 15.89 | ₹12.55 | +5.52% |
| LTIM.NS | ₹4,535.00 | +2.08% | 1.3T | 28.28 | ₹160.34 | +1.48% |
Stock Comparison
LTM.NS vs TCS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 8.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,402.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TCS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TCS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 8.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,396.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TCS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs INFY.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 4.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,154.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INFY.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs INFY.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 4.7T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,154.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INFY.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,203.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,203.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs WIPRO.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹199.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs WIPRO.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 2.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹199.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTIM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTIM.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹4,306.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.87. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTIM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TECHM.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,360.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TECHM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,358.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TECHM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 742.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹4,747.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 741.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹4,747.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 415B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,176.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 414.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,175.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs COFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 386.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,151.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs COFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 386.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,150.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTTS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 358.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,380.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTTS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 358.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,379.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs HEXT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 271B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹444.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs TATATECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 231.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹569.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 43.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs TATATECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 231.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹569.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 43.51. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 193.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹709.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs KPITTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, KPITTECH.BO has a market cap of 193.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while KPITTECH.BO trades at ₹709.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas KPITTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KPITTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check KPITTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 169.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹216.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 169.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹216.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs FSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while FSL.NS trades at ₹209.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check FSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs FSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 144.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while FSL.BO trades at ₹209.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check FSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HEXAWARE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ECLERX.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹1,468.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ECLERX.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹1,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 122.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹536.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.65. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹536.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs BSOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹368.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs BSOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 103B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹368.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹257.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹256.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹361.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.42. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹361.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.36. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MASTEK.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,700.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MASTEK.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,696.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 42.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹707.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹708.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs CAMS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹760.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CAMS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹760.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹3,084.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 76.21. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹269.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹267.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,136.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,135.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹840.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -29.70. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹838.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -29.61. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹525.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹524.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SASKEN.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹1,268.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 50.74. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SASKEN.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹1,267.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 50.77. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹138.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹138.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,160.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs AURUM.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹181.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -53.83. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs AURUM.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹180.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -53.41. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs DSSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹1,036.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs DSSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹1,035.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹278.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 59.70. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹804.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹803.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs BGDL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, BGDL.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while BGDL.BO trades at ₹120.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas BGDL.BO's P/E ratio is 444.63. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BGDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to BGDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check BGDL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MMWL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 258.50. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs NINSYS.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹492.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs NINSYS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹491.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 62.82. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 62.73. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹65.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹64.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ADSL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹113.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ADSL.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹113.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹201.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹201.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹236.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹236.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is 75.93. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is 75.81. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SIGMA.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹44.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SIGMA.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs XTGLOBAL.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹32.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 49.36. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹343.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹342.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹125.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹123.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs 3IINFOLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, 3IINFOLTD.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while 3IINFOLTD.BO trades at ₹17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas 3IINFOLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to 3IINFOLTD.BO's ROE of +0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to 3IINFOLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check 3IINFOLTD.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹139.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 55.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SILVERTUC.NS Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹139.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison April 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1.3T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹4,282.30, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹84.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.34, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.29%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here