LTM Limited (LTM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LTM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM.NS | ₹3,546.70 | -3.78% | 1T | 20.35 | ₹173.84 | +2.12% |
| TCS.BO | ₹1,982.20 | -5.47% | 7.4T | 14.11 | ₹144.12 | +5.41% |
| TCS.NS | ₹1,982.60 | -5.50% | 7.4T | 14.10 | ₹144.10 | +5.41% |
| INFY.BO | ₹985.45 | -4.95% | 4.1T | 13.98 | ₹71.59 | +4.80% |
| INFY.NS | ₹985.30 | -4.96% | 4.1T | 13.90 | ₹71.96 | +4.80% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,034.20 | -6.19% | 2.9T | 16.71 | ₹64.16 | +5.60% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,034.90 | -6.19% | 2.9T | 16.67 | ₹64.29 | +5.60% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹170.13 | -3.05% | 1.8T | 13.33 | ₹12.78 | +6.46% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹170.05 | -3.11% | 1.8T | 13.04 | ₹13.07 | +6.46% |
| LTIM.NS | ₹4,535.00 | +2.08% | 1.3T | 28.28 | ₹160.34 | +2.82% |
Stock Comparison
LTM.NS vs TCS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 7.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TCS.BO trades at ₹1,982.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TCS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TCS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 7.4T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TCS.NS trades at ₹1,982.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TCS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs INFY.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while INFY.BO trades at ₹985.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INFY.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs INFY.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 4.1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while INFY.NS trades at ₹985.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INFY.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,034.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 2.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,034.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs WIPRO.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹170.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs WIPRO.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹170.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTIM.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs TECHM.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,362.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TECHM.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TECHM.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TECHM.NS trades at ₹1,362.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TECHM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECHM.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TECHM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TECHM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTIM.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹3,547.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTIM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 676.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹4,326.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.15. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 675.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹4,330.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs COFORGE.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 492.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,372.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.87. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs COFORGE.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 492.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,370.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 413.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,129.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 412.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,126.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTTS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 334B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,050.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.66. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs LTTS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 333B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,047.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs HEXT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 313.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹551.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs TATATECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 277.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹670.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs TATATECH.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 276.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹670.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 52.46. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 216.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹273.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 215.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹273.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 182.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹557.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs FSL.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while FSL.NS trades at ₹229.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check FSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs FSL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 156.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while FSL.BO trades at ₹230.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check FSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HEXAWARE.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ECLERX.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 124.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹1,332.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ECLERX.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹1,332.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹426.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹427.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs BSOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹275.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs BSOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹275.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹262.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹264.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹337.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹336.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.80. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MASTEK.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,560.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MASTEK.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,568.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹4,103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 258.61. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹804.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹806.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CAMS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹792.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CAMS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹792.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,265.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,260.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SASKEN.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹2,274.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.96. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SASKEN.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹2,269.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.84. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹840.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -70.88. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹842.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -71.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹223.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹224.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.32. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹191.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹194.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹587.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹589.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹31.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DSSL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹1,311.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DSSL.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹1,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs AURUM.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹227.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -66.17. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs AURUM.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹227.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -69.40. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs NINSYS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹839.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 47.90. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs NINSYS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹839.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MMWL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹13.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 1140.00. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹795.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹793.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹244.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 249.34. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs PVP.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PVP.NS trades at ₹29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -112.39. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PVP.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs PVP.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while PVP.BO trades at ₹29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -91.65. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check PVP.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ADSL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹125.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs ADSL.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹125.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹60.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹60.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.56. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹289.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹204.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹203.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹289.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹400.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.82. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹399.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is 1036.13. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SILVERTUC.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹179.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹179.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹146.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is more volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹147.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 15.02. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs INSPIRISYS.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹102.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SIGMA.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹38.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
LTM.NS vs SIGMA.NS Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here
LTM.NS vs XTGLOBAL.BO Comparison July 2026
LTM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LTM.NS stands at 1T. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LTM.NS is priced at ₹3,546.70, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹28.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LTM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 20.35, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.46. In terms of profitability, LTM.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LTM.NS is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LTM.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here