Tech Mahindra Limited (TECHM.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TECHM.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECHM.NS | ₹1,406.50 | -0.26% | 1.2T | 25.90 | ₹54.31 | +3.62% |
| TCS.NS | ₹2,057.60 | -1.71% | 7.4T | 14.28 | ₹144.10 | +5.25% |
| TCS.BO | ₹2,057.50 | -1.68% | 7.4T | 14.28 | ₹144.12 | +5.25% |
| INFY.BO | ₹1,042.40 | -0.44% | 4.2T | 14.56 | ₹71.59 | +4.58% |
| INFY.NS | ₹1,042.20 | -0.48% | 4.2T | 14.48 | ₹71.96 | +4.58% |
| HCLTECH.NS | ₹1,134.20 | -0.42% | 3.1T | 17.68 | ₹64.16 | +5.27% |
| HCLTECH.BO | ₹1,134.05 | -0.51% | 3.1T | 17.64 | ₹64.29 | +5.27% |
| WIPRO.NS | ₹174.32 | -1.00% | 1.8T | 13.64 | ₹12.78 | +6.25% |
| WIPRO.BO | ₹174.30 | -1.02% | 1.8T | 13.34 | ₹13.07 | +6.25% |
| LTIM.NS | ₹4,535.00 | +2.08% | 1.3T | 28.28 | ₹160.34 | +2.82% |
Stock Comparison
TECHM.NS vs TCS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TCS.NS has a market cap of 7.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TCS.NS trades at ₹2,057.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TCS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCS.NS's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TCS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TCS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TCS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TCS.BO has a market cap of 7.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TCS.BO trades at ₹2,057.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TCS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TCS.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TCS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TCS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs INFY.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INFY.BO has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while INFY.BO trades at ₹1,042.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas INFY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INFY.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check INFY.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs INFY.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INFY.NS has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while INFY.NS trades at ₹1,042.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas INFY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INFY.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to INFY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check INFY.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HCLTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HCLTECH.NS has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HCLTECH.NS trades at ₹1,134.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HCLTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCLTECH.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HCLTECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HCLTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HCLTECH.BO has a market cap of 3.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HCLTECH.BO trades at ₹1,134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HCLTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HCLTECH.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to HCLTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HCLTECH.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs WIPRO.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, WIPRO.NS has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while WIPRO.NS trades at ₹174.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas WIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check WIPRO.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs WIPRO.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, WIPRO.BO has a market cap of 1.8T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while WIPRO.BO trades at ₹174.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas WIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to WIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check WIPRO.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs LTIM.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LTIM.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while LTIM.NS trades at ₹4,535.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas LTIM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTIM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to LTIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check LTIM.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TECHM.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TECHM.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TECHM.BO trades at ₹1,405.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TECHM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TECHM.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to TECHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TECHM.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs LTIM.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LTIM.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while LTIM.BO trades at ₹3,740.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas LTIM.BO's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTIM.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to LTIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check LTIM.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs LTM.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LTM.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while LTM.NS trades at ₹3,727.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas LTM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTM.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to LTM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check LTM.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PERSISTENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.BO has a market cap of 737.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PERSISTENT.BO trades at ₹4,716.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PERSISTENT.BO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PERSISTENT.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to PERSISTENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PERSISTENT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PERSISTENT.NS has a market cap of 736.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PERSISTENT.NS trades at ₹4,715.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PERSISTENT.NS's P/E ratio is 38.94. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PERSISTENT.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to PERSISTENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PERSISTENT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs COFORGE.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, COFORGE.NS has a market cap of 497.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while COFORGE.NS trades at ₹1,481.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas COFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 32.19. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to COFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check COFORGE.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs COFORGE.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, COFORGE.BO has a market cap of 497.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while COFORGE.BO trades at ₹1,481.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas COFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to COFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to COFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check COFORGE.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MPHASIS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MPHASIS.NS has a market cap of 440.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MPHASIS.NS trades at ₹2,307.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MPHASIS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPHASIS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MPHASIS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MPHASIS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MPHASIS.BO has a market cap of 439.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MPHASIS.BO trades at ₹2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MPHASIS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MPHASIS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MPHASIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MPHASIS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs LTTS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LTTS.NS has a market cap of 335.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while LTTS.NS trades at ₹3,161.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas LTTS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTTS.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to LTTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check LTTS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs LTTS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, LTTS.BO has a market cap of 335B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while LTTS.BO trades at ₹3,159.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas LTTS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LTTS.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to LTTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check LTTS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HEXT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HEXT.NS has a market cap of 326.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HEXT.NS trades at ₹535.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HEXT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEXT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to HEXT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HEXT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TATATECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TATATECH.NS has a market cap of 288.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TATATECH.NS trades at ₹711.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TATATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATATECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TATATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TATATECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TATATECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TATATECH.BO has a market cap of 288.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TATATECH.BO trades at ₹711.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TATATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 54.52. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TATATECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TATATECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TATATECH.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs REDINGTON.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, REDINGTON.BO has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while REDINGTON.BO trades at ₹276.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas REDINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REDINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to REDINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check REDINGTON.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs REDINGTON.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, REDINGTON.NS has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while REDINGTON.NS trades at ₹276.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas REDINGTON.NS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REDINGTON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to REDINGTON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check REDINGTON.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs FSL.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, FSL.NS has a market cap of 172.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while FSL.NS trades at ₹249.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas FSL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.84. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check FSL.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs FSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, FSL.BO has a market cap of 172B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while FSL.BO trades at ₹249.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas FSL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FSL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to FSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check FSL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs KPITTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, KPITTECH.NS has a market cap of 151.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while KPITTECH.NS trades at ₹558.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas KPITTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KPITTECH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to KPITTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check KPITTECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HEXAWARE.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HEXAWARE.NS has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HEXAWARE.NS trades at ₹470.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HEXAWARE.NS's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HEXAWARE.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to HEXAWARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HEXAWARE.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ECLERX.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ECLERX.NS has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ECLERX.NS trades at ₹1,498.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ECLERX.NS's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECLERX.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ECLERX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ECLERX.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ECLERX.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ECLERX.BO has a market cap of 140.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ECLERX.BO trades at ₹1,498.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ECLERX.BO's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECLERX.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ECLERX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ECLERX.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.NS has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ZENSARTECH.NS trades at ₹477.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ZENSARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZENSARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ZENSARTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ZENSARTECH.BO has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ZENSARTECH.BO trades at ₹477.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ZENSARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZENSARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ZENSARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ZENSARTECH.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs BSOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BSOFT.NS has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while BSOFT.NS trades at ₹280.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas BSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 15.17. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to BSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check BSOFT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs BSOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, BSOFT.BO has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while BSOFT.BO trades at ₹280.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas BSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to BSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check BSOFT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.NS has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SONATSOFTW.NS trades at ₹277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SONATSOFTW.NS's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SONATSOFTW.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SONATSOFTW.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SONATSOFTW.BO has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SONATSOFTW.BO trades at ₹277.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SONATSOFTW.BO's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SONATSOFTW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SONATSOFTW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SONATSOFTW.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs RSYSTEMINT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RSYSTEMINT.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while RSYSTEMINT.BO trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas RSYSTEMINT.BO's P/E ratio is 106.05. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMINT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check RSYSTEMINT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.BO has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HAPPSTMNDS.BO trades at ₹347.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs HAPPSTMNDS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, HAPPSTMNDS.NS has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while HAPPSTMNDS.NS trades at ₹347.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas HAPPSTMNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to HAPPSTMNDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check HAPPSTMNDS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DATAMATICS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.BO has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DATAMATICS.BO trades at ₹850.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DATAMATICS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DATAMATICS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DATAMATICS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DATAMATICS.NS has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DATAMATICS.NS trades at ₹838.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DATAMATICS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.43. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DATAMATICS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DATAMATICS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DATAMATICS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MASTEK.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MASTEK.NS has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MASTEK.NS trades at ₹1,596.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MASTEK.NS's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MASTEK.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MASTEK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MASTEK.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MASTEK.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MASTEK.BO has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MASTEK.BO trades at ₹1,597.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MASTEK.BO's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MASTEK.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is more volatile compared to MASTEK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MASTEK.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ASMTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ASMTEC.BO has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ASMTEC.BO trades at ₹4,070.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ASMTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 259.39. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ASMTEC.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ASMTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ASMTEC.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CAMS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CAMS.NS has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CAMS.NS trades at ₹788.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CAMS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAMS.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CAMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CAMS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CAMS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CAMS.BO has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CAMS.BO trades at ₹788.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CAMS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.29. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAMS.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CAMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CAMS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CIGNITITEC.BO trades at ₹1,265.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CIGNITITEC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIGNITITEC.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CIGNITITEC.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CIGNITITEC.NS has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CIGNITITEC.NS trades at ₹1,260.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CIGNITITEC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CIGNITITEC.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CIGNITITEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CIGNITITEC.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SASKEN.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SASKEN.NS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SASKEN.NS trades at ₹2,051.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SASKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.74. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SASKEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SASKEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SASKEN.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SASKEN.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SASKEN.BO has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SASKEN.BO trades at ₹2,049.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SASKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 57.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SASKEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SASKEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SASKEN.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs RPSGVENT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while RPSGVENT.NS trades at ₹869.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas RPSGVENT.NS's P/E ratio is -72.72. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPSGVENT.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs RPSGVENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RPSGVENT.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while RPSGVENT.BO trades at ₹868.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas RPSGVENT.BO's P/E ratio is -72.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPSGVENT.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to RPSGVENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check RPSGVENT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while RSYSTEMS.NS trades at ₹225.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas RSYSTEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RSYSTEMS.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs RSYSTEMS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, RSYSTEMS.BO has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while RSYSTEMS.BO trades at ₹225.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas RSYSTEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RSYSTEMS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to RSYSTEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check RSYSTEMS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PROTEAN.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PROTEAN.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PROTEAN.BO trades at ₹607.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PROTEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROTEAN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to PROTEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PROTEAN.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PROTEAN.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PROTEAN.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PROTEAN.NS trades at ₹607.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PROTEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PROTEAN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to PROTEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PROTEAN.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SAKSOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SAKSOFT.BO trades at ₹169.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SAKSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAKSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SAKSOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SAKSOFT.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SAKSOFT.NS trades at ₹169.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SAKSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAKSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SAKSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SAKSOFT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MCLOUD.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MCLOUD.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MCLOUD.BO trades at ₹31.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MCLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLOUD.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MCLOUD.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MCLOUD.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MCLOUD.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MCLOUD.NS trades at ₹31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MCLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MCLOUD.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MCLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MCLOUD.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs AURUM.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AURUM.NS has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while AURUM.NS trades at ₹228.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas AURUM.NS's P/E ratio is -70.42. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AURUM.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check AURUM.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs AURUM.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, AURUM.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while AURUM.BO trades at ₹228.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas AURUM.BO's P/E ratio is -67.31. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AURUM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to AURUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check AURUM.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DSSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DSSL.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DSSL.BO trades at ₹1,370.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DSSL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSL.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DSSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DSSL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DSSL.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DSSL.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DSSL.NS trades at ₹1,358.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DSSL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DSSL.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DSSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DSSL.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ACCELYA.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ACCELYA.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ACCELYA.NS trades at ₹1,109.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ACCELYA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACCELYA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ACCELYA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ACCELYA.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ACCELYA.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ACCELYA.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ACCELYA.BO trades at ₹1,108.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ACCELYA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACCELYA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ACCELYA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ACCELYA.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs NINSYS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NINSYS.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while NINSYS.NS trades at ₹888.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas NINSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 51.57. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINSYS.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check NINSYS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs NINSYS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, NINSYS.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while NINSYS.BO trades at ₹864.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas NINSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 50.63. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NINSYS.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to NINSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check NINSYS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MMWL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MMWL.BO has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MMWL.BO trades at ₹13.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MMWL.BO's P/E ratio is 1166.09. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MMWL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MMWL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MMWL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while EXPLEOSOL.NS trades at ₹821.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas EXPLEOSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs EXPLEOSOL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, EXPLEOSOL.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while EXPLEOSOL.BO trades at ₹817.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas EXPLEOSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to EXPLEOSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check EXPLEOSOL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ORIENTTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ORIENTTECH.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ORIENTTECH.NS trades at ₹256.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ORIENTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 258.98. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ORIENTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ORIENTTECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs 3IINFOTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, 3IINFOTECH.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while 3IINFOTECH.BO trades at ₹54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas 3IINFOTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 111.67. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to 3IINFOTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check 3IINFOTECH.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PVP.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PVP.BO trades at ₹27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -84.13. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PVP.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs XCHANGING.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, XCHANGING.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while XCHANGING.NS trades at ₹63.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas XCHANGING.NS's P/E ratio is 11.92. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XCHANGING.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check XCHANGING.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs PVP.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while PVP.NS trades at ₹27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check PVP.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs XCHANGING.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, XCHANGING.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while XCHANGING.BO trades at ₹63.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas XCHANGING.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XCHANGING.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to XCHANGING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check XCHANGING.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ADSL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ADSL.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ADSL.BO trades at ₹122.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ADSL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ADSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ADSL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ADSL.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ADSL.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ADSL.NS trades at ₹122.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ADSL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADSL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ADSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ADSL.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MINDTECK.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MINDTECK.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MINDTECK.NS trades at ₹211.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MINDTECK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MINDTECK.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MINDTECK.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs MINDTECK.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, MINDTECK.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while MINDTECK.BO trades at ₹211.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas MINDTECK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MINDTECK.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to MINDTECK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check MINDTECK.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while VAKRANGEE.NS trades at ₹6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas VAKRANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VAKRANGEE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs VAKRANGEE.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, VAKRANGEE.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while VAKRANGEE.BO trades at ₹6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas VAKRANGEE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VAKRANGEE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to VAKRANGEE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check VAKRANGEE.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ONWARDTEC.BO trades at ₹280.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ONWARDTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONWARDTEC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs ONWARDTEC.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, ONWARDTEC.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while ONWARDTEC.NS trades at ₹281.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas ONWARDTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ONWARDTEC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to ONWARDTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check ONWARDTEC.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TERASOFT.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TERASOFT.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TERASOFT.BO trades at ₹401.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TERASOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TERASOFT.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TERASOFT.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs TERASOFT.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, TERASOFT.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while TERASOFT.NS trades at ₹400.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas TERASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TERASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to TERASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check TERASOFT.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DIGISPICE.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DIGISPICE.BO trades at ₹20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DIGISPICE.BO's P/E ratio is 1070.68. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIGISPICE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs DIGISPICE.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, DIGISPICE.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while DIGISPICE.NS trades at ₹20.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas DIGISPICE.NS's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIGISPICE.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to DIGISPICE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check DIGISPICE.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SILVERTUC.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SILVERTUC.BO trades at ₹183.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SILVERTUC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SILVERTUC.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SILVERTUC.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SILVERTUC.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SILVERTUC.NS trades at ₹183.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SILVERTUC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SILVERTUC.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SILVERTUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SILVERTUC.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CYBERTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CYBERTECH.BO trades at ₹144.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CYBERTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYBERTECH.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs CYBERTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, CYBERTECH.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while CYBERTECH.NS trades at ₹143.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas CYBERTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CYBERTECH.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to CYBERTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check CYBERTECH.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs INSPIRISYS.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while INSPIRISYS.BO trades at ₹105.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas INSPIRISYS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INSPIRISYS.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs INSPIRISYS.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, INSPIRISYS.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while INSPIRISYS.NS trades at ₹104.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas INSPIRISYS.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INSPIRISYS.NS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to INSPIRISYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check INSPIRISYS.NS's competition here
TECHM.NS vs XTGLOBAL.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while XTGLOBAL.BO trades at ₹29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas XTGLOBAL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.48. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XTGLOBAL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SIGMA.BO Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SIGMA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SIGMA.BO trades at ₹38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SIGMA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGMA.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SIGMA.BO's competition here
TECHM.NS vs SIGMA.NS Comparison July 2026
TECHM.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TECHM.NS stands at 1.2T. In comparison, SIGMA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TECHM.NS is priced at ₹1,406.50, while SIGMA.NS trades at ₹38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TECHM.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 25.90, whereas SIGMA.NS's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TECHM.NS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIGMA.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TECHM.NS is less volatile compared to SIGMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TECHM.NS.Check SIGMA.NS's competition here