Xos, Inc.
Xos, Inc. XOSWW Peers
See (XOSWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOSWW | $0.01 | -4.17% | 24.4M | -0.01 | -$0.94 | N/A |
| CAT | $360.51 | +0.20% | 169.6B | 17.59 | $20.49 | +1.57% |
| DE | $521.34 | -0.69% | 141.2B | 25.20 | $20.69 | +1.19% |
| PCAR | $91.03 | +0.34% | 47.8B | 13.81 | $6.59 | +4.35% |
| CNH | $12.81 | -0.08% | 16B | 16.01 | $0.80 | +1.96% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | N/A |
| AGCO | $102.26 | -0.25% | 7.6B | -13.11 | -$7.80 | +1.14% |
| OSK | $109.07 | -0.50% | 7B | 11.65 | $9.36 | +1.79% |
| TEX | $45.51 | +0.26% | 3B | 12.40 | $3.67 | +1.50% |
| ALG | $214.52 | -0.24% | 2.6B | 22.35 | $9.60 | +0.52% |
Stock Comparison
XOSWW vs CAT Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CAT trades at $360.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs DE Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 141.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while DE trades at $521.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs PCAR Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 47.8B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while PCAR trades at $91.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs CNH Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CNH trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 16.01. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs CNHI Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs AGCO Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while AGCO trades at $102.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to AGCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs OSK Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while OSK trades at $109.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs TEX Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while TEX trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs ALG Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while ALG trades at $214.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs REVG Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while REVG trades at $43.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs LNN Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while LNN trades at $136.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs ASTE Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 889.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while ASTE trades at $38.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 58.92. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs HY Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 680.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while HY trades at $38.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs TWI Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 588.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while TWI trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -40.15. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs WNC Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 427.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while WNC trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs SHYF Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 413.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while SHYF trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 590.50. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to SHYF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs CMCO Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 412.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CMCO trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is -80.06. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs MTW Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 400.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while MTW trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs GENC Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while GENC trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs MNTX Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs LEV Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs XOS Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, XOS has a market cap of 25M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while XOS trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas XOS's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to XOS's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to XOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs HYFM Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while HYFM trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs NKLA Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs ZEV Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs ARTW Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while ARTW trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs CEAD Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CEAD's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs UGRO Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while UGRO trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to UGRO's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs IDEX Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs CEADW Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to CEADW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.
XOSWW vs NAV Comparison
XOSWW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOSWW stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOSWW is priced at $0.01, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOSWW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, XOSWW's ROE is -1.17%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOSWW is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOSWW.