Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HYFM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYFM | $0.70 | -6.67% | 3.3M | -0.07 | -$10.73 | N/A |
| CAT | $933.34 | +0.20% | 430.1B | 45.84 | $20.37 | +0.65% |
| DE | $584.40 | -0.21% | 157.8B | 33.12 | $17.65 | +1.11% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | +4.10% |
| CNH | $10.42 | +0.00% | 12.9B | 23.16 | $0.45 | +0.97% |
| AGCO | $114.14 | +0.05% | 8.3B | 19.64 | $5.81 | +1.03% |
| TEX | $65.21 | -0.61% | 4.8B | 12.81 | $5.09 | +1.04% |
| REVG | $63.90 | -1.99% | 3.1B | 33.81 | $1.89 | +0.38% |
| ALG | $163.16 | +0.57% | 2B | 17.81 | $9.17 | +0.78% |
| ASTE | $55.94 | +0.21% | 1.3B | 18.96 | $2.95 | +0.92% |
Stock Comparison
HYFM vs CAT Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 430.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CAT trades at $933.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 45.84. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CAT's competition here
HYFM vs DE Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 157.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while DE trades at $584.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 33.12. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check DE's competition here
HYFM vs CNHI Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNHI's competition here
HYFM vs CNH Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CNH trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNH's competition here
HYFM vs AGCO Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while AGCO trades at $114.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check AGCO's competition here
HYFM vs TEX Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while TEX trades at $65.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check TEX's competition here
HYFM vs REVG Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while REVG trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check REVG's competition here
HYFM vs ALG Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while ALG trades at $163.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ALG's competition here
HYFM vs ASTE Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while ASTE trades at $55.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ASTE's competition here
HYFM vs LNN Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while LNN trades at $115.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LNN's competition here
HYFM vs HY Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 573.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while HY trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas HY's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to HY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check HY's competition here
HYFM vs WNC Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 545.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while WNC trades at $13.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check WNC's competition here
HYFM vs TWI Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 485.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while TWI trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check TWI's competition here
HYFM vs SHYF Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check SHYF's competition here
HYFM vs CMCO Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 380M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CMCO trades at $13.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CMCO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CMCO's competition here
HYFM vs MNTX Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check MNTX's competition here
HYFM vs LEV Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LEV's competition here
HYFM vs RYM Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, RYM has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while RYM trades at $22.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas RYM's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to RYM's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to RYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check RYM's competition here
HYFM vs NKLA Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NKLA's competition here
HYFM vs ARTW Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while ARTW trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 119.70. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to ARTW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ARTW's competition here
HYFM vs ZEV Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZEV's competition here
HYFM vs CEAD Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEAD's competition here
HYFM vs IDEX Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check IDEX's competition here
HYFM vs CEADW Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEADW's competition here
HYFM vs BLT Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, BLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while BLT trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas BLT's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to BLT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to BLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check BLT's competition here
HYFM vs NAV Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NAV's competition here
HYFM vs ZEV-WT Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, ZEV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while ZEV-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas ZEV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to ZEV-WT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZEV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZEV-WT's competition here
HYFM vs JOY Comparison July 2026
HYFM plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 3.3M. In comparison, JOY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.70, while JOY trades at $28.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.07, whereas JOY's P/E ratio is -94.41. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is -5.00%, compared to JOY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to JOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check JOY's competition here