Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 375.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while CAT trades at $812.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 34.23. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CAT's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 174.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while DE trades at $646.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to DE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check DE's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while CNHI trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNHI's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while CNH trades at $11.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 26.73. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to CNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CNH's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while FSS trades at $120.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check FSS's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while AGCO trades at $108.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check AGCO's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while REVG trades at $63.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to REVG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check REVG's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while LNN trades at $115.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LNN's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, AEBI has a market cap of 954.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while AEBI trades at $12.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas AEBI's P/E ratio is 102.67. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to AEBI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to AEBI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check AEBI's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 488.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while WNC trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to WNC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to WNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check WNC's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 461.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while TWI trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -11.34. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to TWI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check TWI's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while SHYF trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check SHYF's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while MNTX trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check MNTX's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while LEV trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check LEV's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while NKLA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NKLA's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while ARTW trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is -427.54. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to ARTW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ARTW's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while ZEV trades at $1.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZEV's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while CEAD trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEAD's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while IDEX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check IDEX's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while CEADW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check CEADW's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while NAV trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check NAV's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, JOY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while JOY trades at $28.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JOY's P/E ratio is -114.25. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to JOY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to JOY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check JOY's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, ZEV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while ZEV-WT trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas ZEV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to ZEV-WT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to ZEV-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check ZEV-WT's competition here

Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: HYFM) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HYFM stands at 5M. In comparison, BLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HYFM is priced at $0.93 on the NASDAQ, while BLT trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HYFM currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas BLT's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, HYFM's ROE is +21.76%, compared to BLT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HYFM is more volatile compared to BLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HYFM.Check BLT's competition here