Xos, Inc.
Xos, Inc. (XOS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XOS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOS | $2.17 | -0.69% | 19.1M | -0.53 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| CAT | $761.22 | +0.09% | 355.5B | 40.38 | $18.81 | +0.78% |
| DE | $656.50 | -0.83% | 179.6B | 35.87 | $18.47 | +0.98% |
| PCAR | $126.27 | +1.10% | 67.5B | 28.48 | $4.51 | +2.13% |
| CNH | $12.81 | -1.35% | 16.3B | 26.66 | $0.49 | +1.90% |
| CNHI | $11.45 | -0.61% | 14.4B | 6.66 | $1.72 | +4.10% |
| OSK | $172.65 | +1.27% | 11.2B | 17.52 | $10.02 | +1.19% |
| AGCO | $136.63 | -1.36% | 10.3B | 14.12 | $9.75 | +0.84% |
| TEX | $66.25 | -3.94% | 4.5B | 20.48 | $3.33 | +0.99% |
| REVG | $63.90 | -1.99% | 3.1B | 33.81 | $1.89 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
XOS vs CAT Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CAT has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CAT trades at $761.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CAT's P/E ratio is 40.38. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CAT's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to CAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CAT's competition here
XOS vs DE Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, DE has a market cap of 179.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while DE trades at $656.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas DE's P/E ratio is 35.87. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to DE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check DE's competition here
XOS vs PCAR Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, PCAR has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while PCAR trades at $126.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas PCAR's P/E ratio is 28.48. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to PCAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to PCAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check PCAR's competition here
XOS vs CNH Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CNH has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CNH trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CNH's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CNH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to CNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CNH's competition here
XOS vs CNHI Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CNHI has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CNHI trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CNHI's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CNHI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to CNHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CNHI's competition here
XOS vs OSK Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, OSK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while OSK trades at $172.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas OSK's P/E ratio is 17.52. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to OSK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to OSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check OSK's competition here
XOS vs AGCO Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, AGCO has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while AGCO trades at $136.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas AGCO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to AGCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to AGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check AGCO's competition here
XOS vs TEX Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, TEX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while TEX trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas TEX's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to TEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to TEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check TEX's competition here
XOS vs REVG Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, REVG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while REVG trades at $63.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas REVG's P/E ratio is 33.81. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to REVG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to REVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check REVG's competition here
XOS vs ALG Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, ALG has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while ALG trades at $210.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas ALG's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to ALG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to ALG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check ALG's competition here
XOS vs LNN Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, LNN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while LNN trades at $135.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas LNN's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to LNN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to LNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check LNN's competition here
XOS vs ASTE Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, ASTE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while ASTE trades at $57.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas ASTE's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to ASTE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to ASTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check ASTE's competition here
XOS vs HY Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, HY has a market cap of 703.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while HY trades at $37.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas HY's P/E ratio is 283.21. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to HY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to HY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check HY's competition here
XOS vs TWI Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, TWI has a market cap of 692M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while TWI trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas TWI's P/E ratio is -108.20. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to TWI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to TWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check TWI's competition here
XOS vs CMCO Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CMCO has a market cap of 548.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CMCO trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CMCO's P/E ratio is 90.95. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CMCO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to CMCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CMCO's competition here
XOS vs MTW Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, MTW has a market cap of 512.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while MTW trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas MTW's P/E ratio is 72.30. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to MTW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to MTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check MTW's competition here
XOS vs WNC Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, WNC has a market cap of 470.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while WNC trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas WNC's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to WNC's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to WNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check WNC's competition here
XOS vs SHYF Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, SHYF has a market cap of 439M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while SHYF trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas SHYF's P/E ratio is 627.00. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to SHYF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to SHYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check SHYF's competition here
XOS vs GENC Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, GENC has a market cap of 230M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while GENC trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas GENC's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to GENC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to GENC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check GENC's competition here
XOS vs MNTX Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, MNTX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while MNTX trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas MNTX's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to MNTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to MNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check MNTX's competition here
XOS vs LEV Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, LEV has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while LEV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas LEV's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to LEV's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to LEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check LEV's competition here
XOS vs RYM Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, RYM has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while RYM trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas RYM's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to RYM's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to RYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check RYM's competition here
XOS vs NKLA Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, NKLA has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while NKLA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas NKLA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to NKLA's ROE of -2.78%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to NKLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check NKLA's competition here
XOS vs XOSWW Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, XOSWW has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while XOSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas XOSWW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to XOSWW's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to XOSWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check XOSWW's competition here
XOS vs ARTW Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, ARTW has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while ARTW trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas ARTW's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to ARTW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to ARTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check ARTW's competition here
XOS vs ZEV Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, ZEV has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while ZEV trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas ZEV's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to ZEV's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to ZEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check ZEV's competition here
XOS vs CEAD Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CEAD has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CEAD trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CEAD's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CEAD's ROE of +2.34%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to CEAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CEAD's competition here
XOS vs ZDAI Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, ZDAI has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while ZDAI trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas ZDAI's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to ZDAI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to ZDAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check ZDAI's competition here
XOS vs HYFM Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, HYFM has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while HYFM trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas HYFM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to HYFM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to HYFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check HYFM's competition here
XOS vs UGRO Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, UGRO has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while UGRO trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas UGRO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to UGRO's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to UGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check UGRO's competition here
XOS vs IDEX Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, IDEX has a market cap of 42.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while IDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas IDEX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to IDEX's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to IDEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check IDEX's competition here
XOS vs CEADW Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, CEADW has a market cap of 19.7K. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while CEADW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas CEADW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CEADW's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is less volatile compared to CEADW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check CEADW's competition here
XOS vs NAV Comparison February 2026
XOS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XOS stands at 19.1M. In comparison, NAV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, XOS is priced at $2.17, while NAV trades at $44.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XOS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.53, whereas NAV's P/E ratio is -23.25. In terms of profitability, XOS's ROE is -1.28%, compared to NAV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XOS is more volatile compared to NAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XOS.Check NAV's competition here