Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.
Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd. (XIN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (XIN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XIN | $1.95 | -1.02% | 13.5M | -0.22 | -$9.00 | N/A |
| BEPH | $14.83 | -1.59% | 6.5B | N/A | N/A | +4.39% |
| BEPI | $15.50 | -0.64% | 6.4B | N/A | N/A | +4.39% |
| FOR | $25.52 | -3.52% | 1.3B | 7.79 | $3.28 | N/A |
| LSEA | $11.31 | +0.00% | 411.8M | 43.50 | $0.26 | N/A |
| FPH | $4.71 | -3.29% | 332M | 7.72 | $0.61 | N/A |
| ARL | $13.26 | +1.07% | 219.3M | 17.87 | $0.76 | N/A |
| OZ | $49.26 | -1.22% | 192.3M | -4.60 | -$10.72 | N/A |
| AMBR | $1.93 | -2.03% | 180.8M | 7.72 | $0.25 | N/A |
| HGSH | $3.02 | +1.34% | 168.5M | 11.57 | $0.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
XIN vs BEPH Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, BEPH has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while BEPH trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BEPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to BEPH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to BEPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check BEPH's competition here
XIN vs BEPI Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, BEPI has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while BEPI trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas BEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to BEPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to BEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check BEPI's competition here
XIN vs FOR Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, FOR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while FOR trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FOR's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to FOR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to FOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check FOR's competition here
XIN vs LSEA Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, LSEA has a market cap of 411.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while LSEA trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LSEA's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to LSEA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to LSEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check LSEA's competition here
XIN vs FPH Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, FPH has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while FPH trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas FPH's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to FPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to FPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check FPH's competition here
XIN vs ARL Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, ARL has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while ARL trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas ARL's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to ARL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to ARL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check ARL's competition here
XIN vs OZ Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, OZ has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while OZ trades at $49.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas OZ's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to OZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to OZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check OZ's competition here
XIN vs AMBR Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, AMBR has a market cap of 180.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while AMBR trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AMBR's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to AMBR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to AMBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check AMBR's competition here
XIN vs HGSH Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, HGSH has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while HGSH trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HGSH's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to HGSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to HGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check HGSH's competition here
XIN vs AXR Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, AXR has a market cap of 132.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while AXR trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AXR's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to AXR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to AXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check AXR's competition here
XIN vs SDHC Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, SDHC has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while SDHC trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SDHC's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to SDHC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to SDHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check SDHC's competition here
XIN vs JFB Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, JFB has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while JFB trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas JFB's P/E ratio is -35.07. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to JFB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to JFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check JFB's competition here
XIN vs AEI Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, AEI has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while AEI trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas AEI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to AEI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to AEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check AEI's competition here
XIN vs MRNO Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, MRNO has a market cap of 44.9M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while MRNO trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas MRNO's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to MRNO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to MRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check MRNO's competition here
XIN vs SGDVV Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, SGDVV has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while SGDVV trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SGDVV's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to SGDVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to SGDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check SGDVV's competition here
XIN vs LRE Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, LRE has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while LRE trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LRE's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to LRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to LRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check LRE's competition here
XIN vs LSEAW Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, LSEAW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while LSEAW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas LSEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to LSEAW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to LSEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check LSEAW's competition here
XIN vs GGE Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, GGE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while GGE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas GGE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to GGE's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to GGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check GGE's competition here
XIN vs RENX Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, RENX has a market cap of 921.1K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while RENX trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas RENX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to RENX's ROE of -6.04%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is more volatile compared to RENX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check RENX's competition here
XIN vs HCDIP Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, HCDIP has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while HCDIP trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HCDIP's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to HCDIP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to HCDIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check HCDIP's competition here
XIN vs HCDIW Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, HCDIW has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while HCDIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HCDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to HCDIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to HCDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check HCDIW's competition here
XIN vs HCDI Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, HCDI has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while HCDI trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HCDI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to HCDI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to HCDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check HCDI's competition here
XIN vs HCDIZ Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, HCDIZ has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while HCDIZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas HCDIZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to HCDIZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to HCDIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check HCDIZ's competition here
XIN vs SGD Comparison May 2026
XIN plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, XIN stands at 13.5M. In comparison, SGD has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, XIN is priced at $1.95, while SGD trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
XIN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.22, whereas SGD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, XIN's ROE is -2.31%, compared to SGD's ROE of -7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, XIN is less volatile compared to SGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for XIN.Check SGD's competition here