Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BEPH has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while BEPH trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas BEPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEPH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BEPI has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while BEPI trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas BEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to BEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BEPI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while KW trades at $10.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas KW's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check KW's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HBNB trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -40.77. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HBNB's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 756.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while SKYH trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -141.14. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SKYH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SKYH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSEA has a market cap of 411.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while LSEA trades at $11.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas LSEA's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSEA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEA's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FPH has a market cap of 358.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while FPH trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas FPH's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to FPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check FPH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ARL has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while ARL trades at $20.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas ARL's P/E ratio is 350.83. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to ARL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check ARL's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OZ has a market cap of 176.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while OZ trades at $45.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas OZ's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to OZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check OZ's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HGSH has a market cap of 168.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HGSH trades at $3.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HGSH's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HGSH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HGSH's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AXR has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while AXR trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas AXR's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AXR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AXR's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AMBR has a market cap of 132.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while AMBR trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas AMBR's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AMBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AMBR's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SDHC has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while SDHC trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas SDHC's P/E ratio is -41.85. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SDHC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SDHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SDHC's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IRS-WT has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while IRS-WT trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas IRS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IRS-WT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to IRS-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check IRS-WT's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while LPA trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LPA's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, JFB has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while JFB trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas JFB's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JFB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to JFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check JFB's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AEI has a market cap of 47.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while AEI trades at $1.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas AEI's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEI's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to AEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check AEI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGDVV has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while SGDVV trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas SGDVV's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGDVV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SGDVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SGDVV's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MRNO has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while MRNO trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas MRNO's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRNO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to MRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check MRNO's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LRE has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while LRE trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas LRE's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LRE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to LRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LRE's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, XIN has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while XIN trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas XIN's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XIN's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to XIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check XIN's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LSEAW has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while LSEAW trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas LSEAW's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LSEAW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is more volatile compared to LSEAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check LSEAW's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GGE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while GGE trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas GGE's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GGE's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to GGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check GGE's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RENX has a market cap of 914.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while RENX trades at $2.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas RENX's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RENX's ROE of -7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to RENX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check RENX's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCDI has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HCDI trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HCDI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCDI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDI's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCDIZ has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HCDIZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HCDIZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCDIZ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIZ's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCDIP has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HCDIP trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HCDIP's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCDIP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIP's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HCDIW has a market cap of 463.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while HCDIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas HCDIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HCDIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to HCDIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check HCDIW's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SGD has a market cap of 340K. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while SGD trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas SGD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGD's ROE of -7.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to SGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check SGD's competition here

FOR plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FOR stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BPYPM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FOR is priced at $30.51, while BPYPM trades at $15.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FOR currently has a P/E ratio of 9.29, whereas BPYPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FOR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPYPM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FOR is less volatile compared to BPYPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FOR.Check BPYPM's competition here