Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. WPM Peers
See (WPM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPM | $87.76 | -1.72% | 41B | 66.38 | $1.36 | +0.53% |
| NEM | $56.82 | -2.14% | 65.9B | 13.49 | $4.39 | +1.70% |
| AEM | $116.15 | -3.03% | 62.2B | 26.19 | $4.70 | +1.31% |
| GOLD | $20.54 | -1.58% | 36.4B | 17.34 | $1.22 | +1.89% |
| FNV | $160.90 | -1.53% | 31.8B | 51.51 | $3.20 | +0.90% |
| AU | $43.79 | -5.73% | 23.3B | 21.26 | $2.18 | +0.27% |
| GFI | $22.71 | -5.44% | 21.3B | 17.26 | $1.38 | +2.30% |
| KGC | $14.89 | -2.78% | 19.4B | 16.17 | $0.98 | +0.76% |
| RGLD | $174.50 | -1.23% | 11.8B | 29.79 | $6.04 | +0.95% |
| AGI | $25.42 | -2.64% | 11B | 42.19 | $0.62 | +0.38% |
Stock Comparison
WPM vs NEM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while NEM trades at $56.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AEM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AEM trades at $116.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 26.19. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GOLD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GOLD trades at $20.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs FNV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while FNV trades at $160.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 51.51. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AU trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GFI Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GFI trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs KGC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while KGC trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 16.17. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs RGLD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while RGLD trades at $174.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 29.79. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AGI Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AGI trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HMY Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HMY trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CDE Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while CDE trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AUY Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SBSW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while SBSW trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs BTG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while BTG trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs OR Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while OR trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 151.29. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IAG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while IAG trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 5.05. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs EGO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while EGO trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NGD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while NGD trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HL trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 49.92. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HL-PB Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HL-PB trades at $50.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1699.67. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ORLA Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while ORLA trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SAND Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while SAND trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 93.15. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs EQX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while EQX trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SSRM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, SSRM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while SSRM trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas SSRM's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SSRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SSRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while NG trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CGAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while CGAU trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 40.64. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs SA Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while SA trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -133.18. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ARMN Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while ARMN trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 42.50. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DRD Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while DRD trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CNL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 913.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while CNL trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IAUX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 510.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while IAUX trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GSS Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 429.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while DC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CMCL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while CMCL trades at $18.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 332.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GAU trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ODV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 300M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while ODV trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NFGC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 298.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while NFGC trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs CTGO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 261.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while CTGO trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -6.46. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs DC-WT Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while DC-WT trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs IDR Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 187.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while IDR trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs THM Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while THM trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -44.75. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs USAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 180.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while USAU trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GSV Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GLDG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GLDG trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs VGZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while VGZ trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMC Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 120.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HYMC trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs TRX Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 93.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while TRX trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GORO Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 74.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GORO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs NVAWW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while NVAWW trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is more volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs PZG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while PZG trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs ODVWZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while ODVWZ trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AAU Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs AUST Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while AUST trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCW Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs GPL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs PVG Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs KL Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.
WPM vs HYMCZ Comparison
WPM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WPM stands at 41B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WPM is priced at $87.76, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WPM currently has a P/E ratio of 66.38, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WPM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WPM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WPM.