Worthington Industries, Inc.

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while ATI trades at $147.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 49.93. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ATI's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while CRS trades at $378.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 42.07. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CRS's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while MLI trades at $109.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MLI's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while ESAB trades at $98.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ESAB's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while GPGI trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check GPGI's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while AZZ trades at $121.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AZZ's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while ARNC trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ARNC's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPOW's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while CMPO trades at $16.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -1644.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPO's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while PRLB trades at $56.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 63.34. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check PRLB's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while HAYN trades at $60.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check HAYN's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while RYI trades at $23.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check RYI's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPOV's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 679.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while NWPX trades at $71.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check NWPX's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 592.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while IIIN trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check IIIN's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 338.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while MEC trades at $17.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MEC's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 252.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while TG trades at $7.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TG's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while GIFI trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check GIFI's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 139M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while AP trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AP's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while TPCS trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TPCS's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while TRSG trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TRSG's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while LNKS trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check LNKS's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while OLOX trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check OLOX's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while HIHO trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check HIHO's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while SGBX trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check SGBX's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AP-WT's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 44.5K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while MTEN trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MTEN's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 21.6K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while ALPP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ALPP's competition here

WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.4B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $47.99, while CDSI trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 226.90, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WOR has daily volatility of 3.68 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here