Worthington Industries, Inc.
Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WOR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOR | $54.38 | +0.20% | 2.7B | 164.70 | $0.33 | +1.36% |
| CRS | $429.41 | +0.28% | 21.3B | 45.18 | $9.51 | +0.19% |
| ATI | $155.26 | -0.13% | 21.2B | 51.21 | $3.03 | N/A |
| MLI | $133.03 | -1.77% | 14.7B | 17.43 | $7.63 | +0.82% |
| ESAB | $97.94 | -0.34% | 6B | 23.89 | $4.10 | +0.41% |
| GPGI | $15.64 | +1.36% | 4.5B | -12.70 | -$1.23 | +0.02% |
| AZZ | $143.53 | +0.34% | 4.3B | 13.65 | $10.51 | +0.55% |
| ARNC | $29.99 | +0.03% | 3B | -12.55 | -$2.39 | N/A |
| CMPOW | $12.15 | +2.35% | 2.1B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CMPO | $16.51 | -5.93% | 1.7B | -7.06 | -$2.34 | +0.02% |
Stock Comparison
WOR vs CRS Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while CRS trades at $429.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas CRS's P/E ratio is 45.18. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CRS's competition here
WOR vs ATI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ATI has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while ATI trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas ATI's P/E ratio is 51.21. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ATI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ATI's competition here
WOR vs MLI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MLI has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while MLI trades at $133.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas MLI's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLI's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to MLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MLI's competition here
WOR vs ESAB Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ESAB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while ESAB trades at $97.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas ESAB's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ESAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ESAB's competition here
WOR vs GPGI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GPGI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while GPGI trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas GPGI's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPGI's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to GPGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check GPGI's competition here
WOR vs AZZ Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AZZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while AZZ trades at $143.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas AZZ's P/E ratio is 13.65. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZZ's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to AZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AZZ's competition here
WOR vs ARNC Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ARNC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while ARNC trades at $29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas ARNC's P/E ratio is -12.55. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARNC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to ARNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ARNC's competition here
WOR vs CMPOW Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMPOW has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while CMPOW trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas CMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPOW's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPOW's competition here
WOR vs CMPO Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMPO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while CMPO trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas CMPO's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPO's ROE of -1644.88%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to CMPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPO's competition here
WOR vs PRLB Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PRLB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while PRLB trades at $65.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas PRLB's P/E ratio is 74.09. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRLB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to PRLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check PRLB's competition here
WOR vs NWPX Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NWPX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while NWPX trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas NWPX's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWPX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to NWPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check NWPX's competition here
WOR vs HAYN Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HAYN has a market cap of 779.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while HAYN trades at $60.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas HAYN's P/E ratio is 21.03. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HAYN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to HAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check HAYN's competition here
WOR vs RYI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RYI has a market cap of 746.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while RYI trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas RYI's P/E ratio is -32.63. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to RYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check RYI's competition here
WOR vs CMPOV Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMPOV has a market cap of 741.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while CMPOV trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas CMPOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMPOV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to CMPOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check CMPOV's competition here
WOR vs IIIN Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IIIN has a market cap of 512.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while IIIN trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas IIIN's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IIIN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to IIIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check IIIN's competition here
WOR vs MEC Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MEC has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while MEC trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas MEC's P/E ratio is -55.40. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to MEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MEC's competition here
WOR vs ELMT Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ELMT has a market cap of 437.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while ELMT trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas ELMT's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ELMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ELMT's competition here
WOR vs TG Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while TG trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TG's competition here
WOR vs AP Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AP has a market cap of 213.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while AP trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas AP's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AP's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to AP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AP's competition here
WOR vs GIFI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GIFI has a market cap of 192M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while GIFI trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas GIFI's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GIFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to GIFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check GIFI's competition here
WOR vs TPCS Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TPCS has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while TPCS trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas TPCS's P/E ratio is -35.42. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TPCS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to TPCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TPCS's competition here
WOR vs TRSG Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TRSG has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while TRSG trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas TRSG's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is more volatile compared to TRSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check TRSG's competition here
WOR vs SGBXV Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGBXV has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while SGBXV trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas SGBXV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGBXV's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to SGBXV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check SGBXV's competition here
WOR vs HIHO Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, HIHO has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while HIHO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas HIHO's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIHO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to HIHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check HIHO's competition here
WOR vs OLOX Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, OLOX has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while OLOX trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas OLOX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OLOX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to OLOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check OLOX's competition here
WOR vs SGBX Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGBX has a market cap of 533.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while SGBX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas SGBX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGBX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to SGBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check SGBX's competition here
WOR vs AP-WT Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AP-WT has a market cap of 172.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while AP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas AP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AP-WT's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to AP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check AP-WT's competition here
WOR vs LNKS Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LNKS has a market cap of 84.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while LNKS trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas LNKS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LNKS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to LNKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check LNKS's competition here
WOR vs MTEN Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTEN has a market cap of 36.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while MTEN trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas MTEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTEN's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to MTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check MTEN's competition here
WOR vs ALPP Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ALPP has a market cap of 27.1K. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while ALPP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas ALPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WOR is less volatile compared to ALPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WOR.Check ALPP's competition here
WOR vs CDSI Comparison May 2026
WOR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WOR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CDSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WOR is priced at $54.38, while CDSI trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WOR currently has a P/E ratio of 164.70, whereas CDSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WOR's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDSI's ROE of +2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WOR has daily volatility of 2.44 and CDSI has daily volatility of N/A.Check CDSI's competition here