The Western India Plywoods Limited
The Western India Plywoods Limited (WIPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WIPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIPL.NS | ₹153.42 | -4.74% | 1.3B | 60.08 | ₹2.58 | +0.77% |
| CENTURYTEX.BO | ₹2,716.50 | +0.00% | 300B | 116.04 | ₹23.41 | N/A |
| CENTURYTEX.NS | ₹2,714.05 | +1.05% | 299.7B | 116.13 | ₹23.37 | N/A |
| CENTURYPLY.BO | ₹817.10 | -0.58% | 177.7B | 74.91 | ₹10.68 | +0.13% |
| ABREL.NS | ₹1,494.50 | -3.61% | 164.6B | -48.29 | -₹30.83 | +0.13% |
| JKPAPER.NS | ₹369.50 | +1.11% | 61B | 25.67 | ₹14.03 | +1.39% |
| JKPAPER.BO | ₹369.35 | +0.86% | 61B | 25.64 | ₹14.04 | +1.39% |
| GREENPLY.NS | ₹265.90 | -6.52% | 33B | 36.77 | ₹7.19 | +0.19% |
| GREENPLY.BO | ₹265.45 | -6.61% | 32.9B | 36.70 | ₹7.18 | +0.19% |
| WSTCSTPAPR.NS | ₹496.25 | +2.98% | 32B | 22.45 | ₹21.60 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.BO has a market cap of 300B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while CENTURYTEX.BO trades at ₹2,716.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas CENTURYTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.NS has a market cap of 299.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while CENTURYTEX.NS trades at ₹2,714.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas CENTURYTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 116.13. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.BO has a market cap of 177.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while CENTURYPLY.BO trades at ₹817.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas CENTURYPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 74.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYPLY.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ABREL.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABREL.NS has a market cap of 164.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ABREL.NS trades at ₹1,494.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ABREL.NS's P/E ratio is -48.29. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABREL.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ABREL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ABREL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs JKPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JKPAPER.NS has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while JKPAPER.NS trades at ₹369.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas JKPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JKPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to JKPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check JKPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs JKPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JKPAPER.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while JKPAPER.BO trades at ₹369.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas JKPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JKPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to JKPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check JKPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPLY.NS has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GREENPLY.NS trades at ₹265.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GREENPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPLY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPLY.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GREENPLY.BO trades at ₹265.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GREENPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPLY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while WSTCSTPAPR.NS trades at ₹496.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.NS's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while WSTCSTPAPR.BO trades at ₹495.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPANEL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GREENPANEL.BO trades at ₹231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GREENPANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2850.62. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPANEL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPANEL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SESHAPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.NS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SESHAPAPER.NS trades at ₹271.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SESHAPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESHAPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SESHAPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.BO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SESHAPAPER.BO trades at ₹271.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SESHAPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESHAPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs BALLARPUR.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BALLARPUR.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while BALLARPUR.NS trades at ₹257.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas BALLARPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALLARPUR.NS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to BALLARPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check BALLARPUR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ANDHRAPAP.NS trades at ₹67.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ANDHRAPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 70.84. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ANDHRAPAP.BO trades at ₹67.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ANDHRAPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 70.57. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs TNPL.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNPL.NS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while TNPL.NS trades at ₹157.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas TNPL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to TNPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check TNPL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs TNPL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNPL.BO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while TNPL.BO trades at ₹157.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas TNPL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to TNPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check TNPL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAIL.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAIL.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while NRAIL.NS trades at ₹479.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas NRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.61. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to NRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAIL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹476.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while PDMJEPAPER.NS trades at ₹84.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas PDMJEPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while PDMJEPAPER.BO trades at ₹86.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas PDMJEPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAGRINDQ.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAGRINDQ.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while NRAGRINDQ.BO trades at ₹441.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas NRAGRINDQ.BO's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAGRINDQ.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KUANTUM.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KUANTUM.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while KUANTUM.BO trades at ₹79.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas KUANTUM.BO's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KUANTUM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to KUANTUM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KUANTUM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KUANTUM.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KUANTUM.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while KUANTUM.NS trades at ₹78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas KUANTUM.NS's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KUANTUM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to KUANTUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KUANTUM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SATIA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SATIA.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SATIA.BO trades at ₹68.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SATIA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SATIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SATIA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SATIA.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SATIA.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SATIA.NS trades at ₹68.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SATIA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SATIA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SATIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SATIA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMANEWS.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RAMANEWS.BO trades at ₹31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RAMANEWS.BO's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMANEWS.BO's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMANEWS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMANEWS.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs EMAMIPAP.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while EMAMIPAP.BO trades at ₹81.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas EMAMIPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMAMIPAP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check EMAMIPAP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMANEWS.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RAMANEWS.NS trades at ₹32.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RAMANEWS.NS's P/E ratio is -15.58. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMANEWS.NS's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMANEWS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMANEWS.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RIDDHI.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIDDHI.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RIDDHI.BO trades at ₹628.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RIDDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 16.05. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIDDHI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RIDDHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RIDDHI.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PAKKA.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAKKA.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while PAKKA.NS trades at ₹96.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas PAKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 71.27. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAKKA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to PAKKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PAKKA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PAKKA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAKKA.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while PAKKA.BO trades at ₹96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas PAKKA.BO's P/E ratio is 70.42. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAKKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to PAKKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PAKKA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ORIENTPPR.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ORIENTPPR.NS trades at ₹18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ORIENTPPR.NS's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIENTPPR.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ORIENTPPR.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ORIENTPPR.BO trades at ₹19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ORIENTPPR.BO's P/E ratio is -15.56. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIENTPPR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GENUSPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GENUSPAPER.NS trades at ₹13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GENUSPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 36.97. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENUSPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RUCHIRA.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RUCHIRA.NS trades at ₹118.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RUCHIRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUCHIRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RUCHIRA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RUCHIRA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RUCHIRA.BO trades at ₹117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RUCHIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUCHIRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RUCHIRA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GENUSPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GENUSPAPER.BO trades at ₹13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GENUSPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENUSPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SAPPL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAPPL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SAPPL.BO trades at ₹313.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SAPPL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHREYANIND.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SHREYANIND.BO trades at ₹166.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SHREYANIND.BO's P/E ratio is 5.01. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHREYANIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHREYANIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHREYANIND.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHREYANIND.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SHREYANIND.NS trades at ₹166.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SHREYANIND.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHREYANIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHREYANIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHREYANIND.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs VRWODAR.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRWODAR.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while VRWODAR.BO trades at ₹154.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas VRWODAR.BO's P/E ratio is 138.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRWODAR.BO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to VRWODAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check VRWODAR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STARPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STARPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while STARPAPER.NS trades at ₹140.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas STARPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STARPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to STARPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STARPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STARPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STARPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while STARPAPER.BO trades at ₹143.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas STARPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STARPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to STARPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STARPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STHINPA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STHINPA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while STHINPA.BO trades at ₹93.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas STHINPA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.60. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STHINPA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to STHINPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STHINPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SKPMIL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKPMIL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SKPMIL.BO trades at ₹120.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SKPMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.62. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKPMIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SKPMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SKPMIL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ARCHIDPLY.BO trades at ₹85.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ARCHIDPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ARCHIDPLY.NS trades at ₹85.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ARCHIDPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DUROPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DUROPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while DUROPLY.BO trades at ₹145.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas DUROPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUROPLY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DUROPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DUROPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ECOBOAR.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ECOBOAR.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ECOBOAR.BO trades at ₹71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ECOBOAR.BO's P/E ratio is -10.11. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECOBOAR.BO's ROE of -6.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ECOBOAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ECOBOAR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MAGNUM.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAGNUM.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while MAGNUM.BO trades at ₹20.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas MAGNUM.BO's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAGNUM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MAGNUM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MAGNUM.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAGNUM.NS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while MAGNUM.NS trades at ₹20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas MAGNUM.NS's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAGNUM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to MAGNUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MAGNUM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SYLVANPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SYLVANPLY.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SYLVANPLY.NS trades at ₹58.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SYLVANPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYLVANPLY.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SYLVANPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SYLVANPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NATHIND.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATHIND.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while NATHIND.BO trades at ₹52.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas NATHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATHIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NATHIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NATHIND.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GANGAPA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GANGAPA.BO has a market cap of 755.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GANGAPA.BO trades at ₹70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GANGAPA.BO's P/E ratio is 52.24. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANGAPA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANGAPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GANGAPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SUNDARAM.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.BO has a market cap of 677.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SUNDARAM.BO trades at ₹1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SUNDARAM.BO's P/E ratio is 71.50. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNDARAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SUNDARAM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DHANROTO.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHANROTO.BO has a market cap of 676.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while DHANROTO.BO trades at ₹90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas DHANROTO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHANROTO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DHANROTO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DHANROTO.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SUNDARAM.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.NS has a market cap of 672.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SUNDARAM.NS trades at ₹1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SUNDARAM.NS's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNDARAM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SUNDARAM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs UNIPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNIPLY.NS has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while UNIPLY.NS trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas UNIPLY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNIPLY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to UNIPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check UNIPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MALUPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.BO has a market cap of 564.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while MALUPAPER.BO trades at ₹32.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas MALUPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALUPAPER.BO's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to MALUPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MALUPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MALUPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.NS has a market cap of 554.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while MALUPAPER.NS trades at ₹32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas MALUPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALUPAPER.NS's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to MALUPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MALUPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DANUBE.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DANUBE.BO has a market cap of 429.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while DANUBE.BO trades at ₹4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas DANUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 22.48. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DANUBE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DANUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DANUBE.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NATPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATPLY.BO has a market cap of 414.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while NATPLY.BO trades at ₹3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas NATPLY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATPLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NATPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NATPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CELLA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CELLA.BO has a market cap of 342.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while CELLA.BO trades at ₹16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas CELLA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CELLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to CELLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CELLA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASIANTNE.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIANTNE.BO has a market cap of 245.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ASIANTNE.BO trades at ₹9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ASIANTNE.BO's P/E ratio is -46.95. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASIANTNE.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANTNE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASIANTNE.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHRENIK.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHRENIK.NS has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SHRENIK.NS trades at ₹0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SHRENIK.NS's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHRENIK.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRENIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHRENIK.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KAYPOWR.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KAYPOWR.BO has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while KAYPOWR.BO trades at ₹11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas KAYPOWR.BO's P/E ratio is -589.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAYPOWR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to KAYPOWR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KAYPOWR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SANPA.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SANPA.BO has a market cap of 228.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SANPA.BO trades at ₹160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SANPA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANPA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SANPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SANPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SAFFRON.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAFFRON.BO has a market cap of 226.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SAFFRON.BO trades at ₹32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SAFFRON.BO's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFFRON.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SAFFRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SAFFRON.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASTRON.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 211.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASTRON.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 206M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CONTI.NS Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CONTI.NS has a market cap of 175.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while CONTI.NS trades at ₹13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas CONTI.NS's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CONTI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CONTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CONTI.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SCTL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCTL.BO has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SCTL.BO trades at ₹0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SCTL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SCTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SCTL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMAPPR-B.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMAPPR-B.BO has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while RAMAPPR-B.BO trades at ₹12.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas RAMAPPR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMAPPR-B.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHKARTP.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHKARTP.BO has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while SHKARTP.BO trades at ₹6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas SHKARTP.BO's P/E ratio is -29.09. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHKARTP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SHKARTP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHKARTP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GRATEXI.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRATEXI.BO has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while GRATEXI.BO trades at ₹21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas GRATEXI.BO's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRATEXI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GRATEXI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GRATEXI.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs AGIOPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGIOPAPER.BO has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while AGIOPAPER.BO trades at ₹3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas AGIOPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGIOPAPER.BO's ROE of +6.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to AGIOPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check AGIOPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DGL.BO Comparison May 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DGL.BO has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹153.42, while DGL.BO trades at ₹1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 60.08, whereas DGL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DGL.BO's competition here