Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited
Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited (TNPL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNPL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNPL.BO | ₹151.30 | +0.70% | 10.4B | 4.18 | ₹35.80 | +2.00% |
| CENTURYTEX.BO | ₹2,716.50 | +0.00% | 300B | 116.04 | ₹23.41 | N/A |
| CENTURYTEX.NS | ₹2,714.05 | +1.05% | 299.7B | 116.13 | ₹23.37 | N/A |
| CENTURYPLY.NS | ₹778.05 | +1.51% | 170.3B | 71.99 | ₹10.65 | +0.13% |
| CENTURYPLY.BO | ₹779.10 | +1.57% | 170.1B | 71.83 | ₹10.66 | +0.13% |
| ABREL.NS | ₹1,285.80 | +2.48% | 138.2B | -42.31 | -₹29.54 | +0.16% |
| JKPAPER.BO | ₹392.90 | +2.88% | 64.4B | 25.90 | ₹14.67 | +1.32% |
| JKPAPER.NS | ₹392.90 | +2.60% | 64.3B | 25.87 | ₹14.67 | +1.32% |
| GREENPLY.BO | ₹261.15 | +3.28% | 32.3B | 36.07 | ₹7.18 | +0.19% |
| GREENPLY.NS | ₹261.20 | +3.45% | 32.3B | 36.12 | ₹7.17 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
TNPL.BO vs CENTURYTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.BO has a market cap of 300B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CENTURYTEX.BO trades at ₹2,716.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CENTURYTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTURYTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CENTURYTEX.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs CENTURYTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.NS has a market cap of 299.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CENTURYTEX.NS trades at ₹2,714.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CENTURYTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 116.13. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTURYTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CENTURYTEX.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs CENTURYPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.NS has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CENTURYPLY.NS trades at ₹778.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CENTURYPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 71.99. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTURYPLY.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CENTURYPLY.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs CENTURYPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.BO has a market cap of 170.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CENTURYPLY.BO trades at ₹779.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CENTURYPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 71.83. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTURYPLY.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CENTURYPLY.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ABREL.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ABREL.NS has a market cap of 138.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ABREL.NS trades at ₹1,285.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ABREL.NS's P/E ratio is -42.31. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABREL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ABREL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ABREL.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs JKPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JKPAPER.BO has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while JKPAPER.BO trades at ₹392.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas JKPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to JKPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check JKPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs JKPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, JKPAPER.NS has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while JKPAPER.NS trades at ₹392.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas JKPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 25.87. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JKPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to JKPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check JKPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GREENPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GREENPLY.BO has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GREENPLY.BO trades at ₹261.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GREENPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREENPLY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GREENPLY.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GREENPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GREENPLY.NS has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GREENPLY.NS trades at ₹261.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GREENPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREENPLY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GREENPLY.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs WSTCSTPAPR.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.NS has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while WSTCSTPAPR.NS trades at ₹497.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.NS's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check WSTCSTPAPR.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs WSTCSTPAPR.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while WSTCSTPAPR.BO trades at ₹498.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 17.60. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check WSTCSTPAPR.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GREENPANEL.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GREENPANEL.NS trades at ₹198.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GREENPANEL.NS's P/E ratio is -2162.44. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREENPANEL.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GREENPANEL.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GREENPANEL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GREENPANEL.BO trades at ₹198.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GREENPANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -2157.78. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREENPANEL.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GREENPANEL.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SESHAPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SESHAPAPER.BO trades at ₹234.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SESHAPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SESHAPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SESHAPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SESHAPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SESHAPAPER.NS trades at ₹235.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SESHAPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SESHAPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SESHAPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs BALLARPUR.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, BALLARPUR.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while BALLARPUR.NS trades at ₹257.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas BALLARPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BALLARPUR.NS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to BALLARPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check BALLARPUR.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ANDHRAPAP.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ANDHRAPAP.NS trades at ₹62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ANDHRAPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 67.23. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ANDHRAPAP.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ANDHRAPAP.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ANDHRAPAP.BO trades at ₹62.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ANDHRAPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 67.10. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ANDHRAPAP.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs TNPL.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, TNPL.NS has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while TNPL.NS trades at ₹150.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas TNPL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to TNPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check TNPL.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs PDMJEPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while PDMJEPAPER.NS trades at ₹82.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas PDMJEPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check PDMJEPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs PDMJEPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while PDMJEPAPER.BO trades at ₹82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas PDMJEPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check PDMJEPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs NRAIL.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NRAIL.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while NRAIL.NS trades at ₹459.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas NRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.28. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to NRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check NRAIL.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs NRAIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹460.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs NRAGRINDQ.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NRAGRINDQ.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while NRAGRINDQ.BO trades at ₹441.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas NRAGRINDQ.BO's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check NRAGRINDQ.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs KUANTUM.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KUANTUM.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while KUANTUM.NS trades at ₹79.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas KUANTUM.NS's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KUANTUM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to KUANTUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check KUANTUM.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs KUANTUM.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KUANTUM.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while KUANTUM.BO trades at ₹80.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas KUANTUM.BO's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KUANTUM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to KUANTUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check KUANTUM.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SATIA.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SATIA.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SATIA.NS trades at ₹58.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SATIA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATIA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SATIA.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SATIA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SATIA.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SATIA.BO trades at ₹58.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.07. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATIA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SATIA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs EMAMIPAP.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while EMAMIPAP.NS trades at ₹79.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas EMAMIPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMAMIPAP.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check EMAMIPAP.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs EMAMIPAP.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while EMAMIPAP.BO trades at ₹79.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas EMAMIPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 33.39. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EMAMIPAP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check EMAMIPAP.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RIDDHI.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RIDDHI.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RIDDHI.BO trades at ₹699.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RIDDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIDDHI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to RIDDHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RIDDHI.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RAMANEWS.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RAMANEWS.BO trades at ₹29.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RAMANEWS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.46. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAMANEWS.BO's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMANEWS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RAMANEWS.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RAMANEWS.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RAMANEWS.NS trades at ₹28.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RAMANEWS.NS's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAMANEWS.NS's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMANEWS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RAMANEWS.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs PAKKA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PAKKA.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while PAKKA.BO trades at ₹89.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas PAKKA.BO's P/E ratio is 68.25. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAKKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to PAKKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check PAKKA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs PAKKA.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, PAKKA.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while PAKKA.NS trades at ₹89.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas PAKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 68.07. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAKKA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to PAKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check PAKKA.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RUCHIRA.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RUCHIRA.NS trades at ₹125.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RUCHIRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUCHIRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RUCHIRA.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RUCHIRA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RUCHIRA.BO trades at ₹126.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RUCHIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUCHIRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RUCHIRA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ORIENTPPR.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ORIENTPPR.NS trades at ₹18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ORIENTPPR.NS's P/E ratio is -12.54. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORIENTPPR.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ORIENTPPR.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ORIENTPPR.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ORIENTPPR.BO trades at ₹18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ORIENTPPR.BO's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORIENTPPR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ORIENTPPR.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GENUSPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GENUSPAPER.BO trades at ₹12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GENUSPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GENUSPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GENUSPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GENUSPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GENUSPAPER.NS trades at ₹12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GENUSPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GENUSPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GENUSPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SAPPL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SAPPL.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SAPPL.BO trades at ₹315.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SAPPL.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs VRWODAR.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, VRWODAR.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while VRWODAR.BO trades at ₹164.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas VRWODAR.BO's P/E ratio is 141.36. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRWODAR.BO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to VRWODAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check VRWODAR.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs STARPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, STARPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while STARPAPER.NS trades at ₹141.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas STARPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STARPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to STARPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check STARPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs STARPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, STARPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while STARPAPER.BO trades at ₹142.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas STARPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STARPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to STARPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check STARPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SHREYANIND.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SHREYANIND.BO trades at ₹149.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SHREYANIND.BO's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHREYANIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SHREYANIND.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SHREYANIND.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SHREYANIND.NS trades at ₹149.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SHREYANIND.NS's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHREYANIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SHREYANIND.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SKPMIL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SKPMIL.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SKPMIL.BO trades at ₹134.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SKPMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 57.12. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SKPMIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SKPMIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SKPMIL.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs STHINPA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, STHINPA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while STHINPA.BO trades at ₹94.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas STHINPA.BO's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHINPA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to STHINPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check STHINPA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ARCHIDPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ARCHIDPLY.BO trades at ₹81.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ARCHIDPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ARCHIDPLY.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ARCHIDPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ARCHIDPLY.NS trades at ₹81.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ARCHIDPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ARCHIDPLY.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs DUROPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DUROPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while DUROPLY.BO trades at ₹133.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas DUROPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 17.85. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUROPLY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to DUROPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check DUROPLY.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ECOBOAR.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ECOBOAR.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ECOBOAR.BO trades at ₹60.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ECOBOAR.BO's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECOBOAR.BO's ROE of -6.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ECOBOAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ECOBOAR.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs MAGNUM.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MAGNUM.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while MAGNUM.NS trades at ₹20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas MAGNUM.NS's P/E ratio is -11.81. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAGNUM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check MAGNUM.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs MAGNUM.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MAGNUM.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while MAGNUM.BO trades at ₹20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas MAGNUM.BO's P/E ratio is -11.77. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAGNUM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check MAGNUM.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs WIPL.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, WIPL.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while WIPL.NS trades at ₹142.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas WIPL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WIPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to WIPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check WIPL.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SYLVANPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SYLVANPLY.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SYLVANPLY.NS trades at ₹52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SYLVANPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYLVANPLY.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to SYLVANPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SYLVANPLY.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs NATHIND.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NATHIND.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while NATHIND.BO trades at ₹54.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas NATHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATHIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to NATHIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check NATHIND.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GANGAPA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GANGAPA.BO has a market cap of 900.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GANGAPA.BO trades at ₹83.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GANGAPA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.29. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GANGAPA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GANGAPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GANGAPA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs UNIPLY.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, UNIPLY.NS has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while UNIPLY.NS trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas UNIPLY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNIPLY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to UNIPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check UNIPLY.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SUNDARAM.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.BO has a market cap of 663.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SUNDARAM.BO trades at ₹1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SUNDARAM.BO's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDARAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SUNDARAM.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SUNDARAM.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.NS has a market cap of 663.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SUNDARAM.NS trades at ₹1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SUNDARAM.NS's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUNDARAM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SUNDARAM.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs DHANROTO.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DHANROTO.BO has a market cap of 611.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while DHANROTO.BO trades at ₹78.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas DHANROTO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DHANROTO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANROTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check DHANROTO.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs MALUPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.BO has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while MALUPAPER.BO trades at ₹32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas MALUPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MALUPAPER.BO's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to MALUPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check MALUPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs MALUPAPER.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.NS has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while MALUPAPER.NS trades at ₹32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas MALUPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MALUPAPER.NS's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to MALUPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check MALUPAPER.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs DANUBE.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DANUBE.BO has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while DANUBE.BO trades at ₹5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas DANUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DANUBE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to DANUBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check DANUBE.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs NATPLY.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, NATPLY.BO has a market cap of 366.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while NATPLY.BO trades at ₹2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas NATPLY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NATPLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to NATPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check NATPLY.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs CELLA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CELLA.BO has a market cap of 289.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CELLA.BO trades at ₹14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CELLA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.43. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CELLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to CELLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CELLA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ASIANTNE.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ASIANTNE.BO has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ASIANTNE.BO trades at ₹10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ASIANTNE.BO's P/E ratio is -48.52. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASIANTNE.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASIANTNE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ASIANTNE.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SHRENIK.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHRENIK.NS has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SHRENIK.NS trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SHRENIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHRENIK.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRENIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SHRENIK.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SAFFRON.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SAFFRON.BO has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SAFFRON.BO trades at ₹31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SAFFRON.BO's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAFFRON.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SAFFRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SAFFRON.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs KAYPOWR.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, KAYPOWR.BO has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while KAYPOWR.BO trades at ₹10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas KAYPOWR.BO's P/E ratio is -535.50. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAYPOWR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to KAYPOWR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check KAYPOWR.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SANPA.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SANPA.BO has a market cap of 201.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SANPA.BO trades at ₹155.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SANPA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANPA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to SANPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SANPA.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ASTRON.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs ASTRON.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 188.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs CONTI.NS Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, CONTI.NS has a market cap of 180.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while CONTI.NS trades at ₹13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas CONTI.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CONTI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to CONTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check CONTI.NS's competition here
TNPL.BO vs RAMAPPR-B.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, RAMAPPR-B.BO has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while RAMAPPR-B.BO trades at ₹16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas RAMAPPR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check RAMAPPR-B.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SCTL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SCTL.BO has a market cap of 130.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SCTL.BO trades at ₹0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SCTL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCTL.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SCTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SCTL.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs SHKARTP.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, SHKARTP.BO has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while SHKARTP.BO trades at ₹6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas SHKARTP.BO's P/E ratio is -29.77. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHKARTP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to SHKARTP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check SHKARTP.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs GRATEXI.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, GRATEXI.BO has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while GRATEXI.BO trades at ₹24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas GRATEXI.BO's P/E ratio is 87.50. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRATEXI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to GRATEXI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check GRATEXI.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs AGIOPAPER.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, AGIOPAPER.BO has a market cap of 63.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while AGIOPAPER.BO trades at ₹3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas AGIOPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGIOPAPER.BO's ROE of +6.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is more volatile compared to AGIOPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check AGIOPAPER.BO's competition here
TNPL.BO vs DGL.BO Comparison May 2026
TNPL.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPL.BO stands at 10.4B. In comparison, DGL.BO has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPL.BO is priced at ₹151.30, while DGL.BO trades at ₹1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.18, whereas DGL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TNPL.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPL.BO is less volatile compared to DGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPL.BO.Check DGL.BO's competition here