The Western India Plywoods Limited
The Western India Plywoods Limited (WIPL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WIPL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIPL.NS | ₹150.06 | +3.83% | 1.3B | 57.92 | ₹2.59 | +0.80% |
| CENTURYTEX.BO | ₹2,716.50 | +0.00% | 300B | 116.04 | ₹23.41 | +0.17% |
| CENTURYTEX.NS | ₹2,714.05 | +1.05% | 299.7B | 116.13 | ₹23.37 | N/A |
| CENTURYPLY.BO | ₹723.30 | +3.10% | 158.8B | 67.05 | ₹10.66 | +0.14% |
| ABREL.NS | ₹1,144.60 | +1.92% | 127.7B | -37.40 | -₹30.88 | +0.17% |
| JKPAPER.BO | ₹330.10 | +7.66% | 56.5B | 23.74 | ₹14.04 | +1.50% |
| JKPAPER.NS | ₹329.75 | +7.62% | 56.4B | 23.71 | ₹14.03 | +1.50% |
| WSTCSTPAPR.BO | ₹430.30 | +6.08% | 28.7B | 15.96 | ₹27.24 | +1.15% |
| WSTCSTPAPR.NS | ₹431.95 | +6.21% | 28.7B | 20.09 | ₹21.60 | +1.15% |
| GREENPLY.NS | ₹194.77 | +8.02% | 23.4B | 31.17 | ₹6.02 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.BO has a market cap of 300B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while CENTURYTEX.BO trades at ₹2,716.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas CENTURYTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYTEX.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYTEX.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.NS has a market cap of 299.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while CENTURYTEX.NS trades at ₹2,714.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas CENTURYTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 116.13. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CENTURYPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.BO has a market cap of 158.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while CENTURYPLY.BO trades at ₹723.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas CENTURYPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 67.05. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CENTURYPLY.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ABREL.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ABREL.NS has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ABREL.NS trades at ₹1,144.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ABREL.NS's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABREL.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ABREL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ABREL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs JKPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JKPAPER.BO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while JKPAPER.BO trades at ₹330.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas JKPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JKPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to JKPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check JKPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs JKPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, JKPAPER.NS has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while JKPAPER.NS trades at ₹329.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas JKPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JKPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to JKPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check JKPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while WSTCSTPAPR.BO trades at ₹430.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while WSTCSTPAPR.NS trades at ₹431.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.NS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPLY.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GREENPLY.NS trades at ₹194.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GREENPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPLY.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GREENPLY.BO trades at ₹194.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GREENPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GREENPANEL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GREENPANEL.BO trades at ₹181.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GREENPANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -1994.44. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GREENPANEL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPANEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GREENPANEL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SESHAPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SESHAPAPER.NS trades at ₹254.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SESHAPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESHAPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SESHAPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SESHAPAPER.BO trades at ₹253.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SESHAPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SESHAPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs BALLARPUR.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BALLARPUR.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while BALLARPUR.NS trades at ₹257.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas BALLARPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALLARPUR.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to BALLARPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check BALLARPUR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ANDHRAPAP.NS trades at ₹60.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ANDHRAPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 64.74. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ANDHRAPAP.BO trades at ₹60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ANDHRAPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs TNPL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNPL.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while TNPL.BO trades at ₹130.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas TNPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to TNPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check TNPL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs TNPL.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TNPL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while TNPL.NS trades at ₹130.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas TNPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNPL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to TNPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check TNPL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAGRINDQ.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAGRINDQ.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while NRAGRINDQ.BO trades at ₹441.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas NRAGRINDQ.BO's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAGRINDQ.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAIL.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAIL.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while NRAIL.NS trades at ₹408.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas NRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to NRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAIL.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NRAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹410.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while PDMJEPAPER.NS trades at ₹72.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas PDMJEPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while PDMJEPAPER.BO trades at ₹71.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas PDMJEPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KUANTUM.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KUANTUM.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while KUANTUM.BO trades at ₹69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas KUANTUM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KUANTUM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to KUANTUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KUANTUM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KUANTUM.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KUANTUM.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while KUANTUM.NS trades at ₹69.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas KUANTUM.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KUANTUM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to KUANTUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KUANTUM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SATIA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SATIA.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SATIA.BO trades at ₹57.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SATIA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SATIA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SATIA.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SATIA.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SATIA.NS trades at ₹57.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SATIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SATIA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SATIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SATIA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMANEWS.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RAMANEWS.BO trades at ₹30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RAMANEWS.BO's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMANEWS.BO's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMANEWS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMANEWS.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMANEWS.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RAMANEWS.NS trades at ₹30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RAMANEWS.NS's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMANEWS.NS's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMANEWS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMANEWS.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PAKKA.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAKKA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while PAKKA.NS trades at ₹86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas PAKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 64.31. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAKKA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to PAKKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PAKKA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs PAKKA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PAKKA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while PAKKA.BO trades at ₹86.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas PAKKA.BO's P/E ratio is 63.98. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PAKKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to PAKKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check PAKKA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs EMAMIPAP.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while EMAMIPAP.BO trades at ₹64.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas EMAMIPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMAMIPAP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check EMAMIPAP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ORIENTPPR.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ORIENTPPR.NS trades at ₹16.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ORIENTPPR.NS's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIENTPPR.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ORIENTPPR.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ORIENTPPR.BO trades at ₹16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ORIENTPPR.BO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORIENTPPR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RIDDHI.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RIDDHI.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RIDDHI.BO trades at ₹430.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RIDDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIDDHI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RIDDHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RIDDHI.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RUCHIRA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RUCHIRA.BO trades at ₹102.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RUCHIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUCHIRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RUCHIRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RUCHIRA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RUCHIRA.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RUCHIRA.NS trades at ₹102.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RUCHIRA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RUCHIRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RUCHIRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RUCHIRA.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GENUSPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GENUSPAPER.NS trades at ₹10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GENUSPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENUSPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GENUSPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GENUSPAPER.BO trades at ₹10.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GENUSPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GENUSPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SAPPL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAPPL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SAPPL.BO trades at ₹268.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SAPPL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STARPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STARPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while STARPAPER.BO trades at ₹128.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas STARPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STARPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to STARPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STARPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STARPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STARPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while STARPAPER.NS trades at ₹128.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas STARPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STARPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to STARPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STARPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHREYANIND.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SHREYANIND.BO trades at ₹139.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SHREYANIND.BO's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHREYANIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHREYANIND.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHREYANIND.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SHREYANIND.NS trades at ₹137.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SHREYANIND.NS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHREYANIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHREYANIND.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs VRWODAR.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VRWODAR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while VRWODAR.BO trades at ₹121.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas VRWODAR.BO's P/E ratio is 101.23. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VRWODAR.BO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to VRWODAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check VRWODAR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs STHINPA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, STHINPA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while STHINPA.BO trades at ₹88.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas STHINPA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STHINPA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to STHINPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check STHINPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ECOBOAR.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ECOBOAR.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ECOBOAR.BO trades at ₹65.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ECOBOAR.BO's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ECOBOAR.BO's ROE of -6.67%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ECOBOAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ECOBOAR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DUROPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DUROPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while DUROPLY.BO trades at ₹138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas DUROPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DUROPLY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DUROPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DUROPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ARCHIDPLY.NS trades at ₹68.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ARCHIDPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ARCHIDPLY.BO trades at ₹68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ARCHIDPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MAGNUM.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAGNUM.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while MAGNUM.NS trades at ₹20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas MAGNUM.NS's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAGNUM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MAGNUM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MAGNUM.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAGNUM.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while MAGNUM.BO trades at ₹20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas MAGNUM.BO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAGNUM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MAGNUM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SKPMIL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SKPMIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SKPMIL.BO trades at ₹85.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SKPMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKPMIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SKPMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SKPMIL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NATHIND.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATHIND.BO has a market cap of 921.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while NATHIND.BO trades at ₹51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas NATHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATHIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NATHIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NATHIND.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GANGAPA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GANGAPA.BO has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GANGAPA.BO trades at ₹68.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GANGAPA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GANGAPA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GANGAPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GANGAPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs UNIPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, UNIPLY.NS has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while UNIPLY.NS trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas UNIPLY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UNIPLY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to UNIPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check UNIPLY.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DHANROTO.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DHANROTO.BO has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while DHANROTO.BO trades at ₹74.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas DHANROTO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHANROTO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to DHANROTO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DHANROTO.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SUNDARAM.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.BO has a market cap of 582.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SUNDARAM.BO trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SUNDARAM.BO's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNDARAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SUNDARAM.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SUNDARAM.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.NS has a market cap of 578.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SUNDARAM.NS trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SUNDARAM.NS's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUNDARAM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SUNDARAM.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs NATPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NATPLY.BO has a market cap of 558.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while NATPLY.BO trades at ₹4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas NATPLY.BO's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NATPLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to NATPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check NATPLY.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MALUPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.NS has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while MALUPAPER.NS trades at ₹30.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas MALUPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALUPAPER.NS's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to MALUPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MALUPAPER.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs MALUPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.BO has a market cap of 510.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while MALUPAPER.BO trades at ₹30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas MALUPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MALUPAPER.BO's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to MALUPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check MALUPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DANUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DANUBE.BO has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while DANUBE.BO trades at ₹4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas DANUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DANUBE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to DANUBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DANUBE.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs CELLA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CELLA.BO has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while CELLA.BO trades at ₹13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas CELLA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CELLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to CELLA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check CELLA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHRENIK.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHRENIK.NS has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SHRENIK.NS trades at ₹0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SHRENIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHRENIK.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHRENIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHRENIK.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASIANTNE.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASIANTNE.BO has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ASIANTNE.BO trades at ₹9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ASIANTNE.BO's P/E ratio is -43.57. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASIANTNE.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ASIANTNE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASIANTNE.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SANPA.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SANPA.BO has a market cap of 198.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SANPA.BO trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SANPA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SANPA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SANPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SANPA.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SAFFRON.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SAFFRON.BO has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SAFFRON.BO trades at ₹25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SAFFRON.BO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SAFFRON.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SAFFRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SAFFRON.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs KAYPOWR.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, KAYPOWR.BO has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while KAYPOWR.BO trades at ₹9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas KAYPOWR.BO's P/E ratio is -431.50. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KAYPOWR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to KAYPOWR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check KAYPOWR.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASTRON.NS Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
WIPL.NS vs ASTRON.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SCTL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCTL.BO has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SCTL.BO trades at ₹0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SCTL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCTL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to SCTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SCTL.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs RAMAPPR-B.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, RAMAPPR-B.BO has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while RAMAPPR-B.BO trades at ₹13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas RAMAPPR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check RAMAPPR-B.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs SHKARTP.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SHKARTP.BO has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while SHKARTP.BO trades at ₹5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas SHKARTP.BO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHKARTP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to SHKARTP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check SHKARTP.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs AGIOPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AGIOPAPER.BO has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while AGIOPAPER.BO trades at ₹3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas AGIOPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGIOPAPER.BO's ROE of +6.78%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to AGIOPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check AGIOPAPER.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs GRATEXI.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRATEXI.BO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while GRATEXI.BO trades at ₹17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas GRATEXI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRATEXI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is more volatile compared to GRATEXI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check GRATEXI.BO's competition here
WIPL.NS vs DGL.BO Comparison April 2026
WIPL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WIPL.NS stands at 1.3B. In comparison, DGL.BO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WIPL.NS is priced at ₹150.06, while DGL.BO trades at ₹1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WIPL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.92, whereas DGL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, WIPL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WIPL.NS is less volatile compared to DGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WIPL.NS.Check DGL.BO's competition here