WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028 WHFCL Peers
See (WHFCL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHFCL | $25.28 | +0.24% | 204M | N/A | N/A | +19.97% |
| BNJ | $15.52 | +0.46% | 107.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.66% |
| SFB | $20.96 | -0.20% | 11.1B | N/A | N/A | +1.98% |
| MGRB | $17.44 | +0.46% | 5.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.67 | +1.13% | 5.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGR | $20.90 | -0.10% | 5.8B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| CGBDL | $25.80 | +0.51% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.98% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +14.15% |
| FCRX | $24.77 | +0.12% | 918.8M | 174.58 | $0.14 | +6.31% |
| BULLW | $4.54 | -7.35% | 660M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WHFCL vs BNJ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 107.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while BNJ trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs SFB Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while SFB trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs MGRB Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while MGRB trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs MGRD Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while MGRD trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs MGR Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while MGR trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs CGBDL Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while CGBDL trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs TRINL Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs FCRX Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 918.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while FCRX trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 174.58. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs BULLW Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 660M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while BULLW trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs GLADZ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 590.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while GLADZ trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs SAJ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while SAJ trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs SAZ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 391.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while SAZ trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs SAY Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 391M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while SAY trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs BTMWW Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 359.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while BTMWW trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs GECCZ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while GECCZ trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs RILYZ Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while RILYZ trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs GEGGL Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while GEGGL trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs STSB Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs CAS Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while CAS trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs ZBAI Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while ZBAI trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs HBTA Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while HBTA trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 29.43. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.
WHFCL vs GJH Comparison
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 204M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.28, while GJH trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.