WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028
WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. 7.875% Notes due 2028 (WHFCL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WHFCL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Investment - Banking & Investment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHFCL | $25.48 | -0.08% | 205.1M | N/A | N/A | +20.40% |
| BNJ | $15.54 | -0.51% | 110.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.50% |
| SFB | $20.72 | +1.12% | 11.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.53% |
| MGR | $21.27 | +0.76% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRB | $17.42 | -0.29% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| MGRD | $15.52 | -0.83% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +0.02% |
| TRINL | $25.07 | -0.24% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +13.46% |
| CGBDL | $25.80 | -1.13% | 1B | N/A | N/A | +7.90% |
| FCRX | $24.87 | -0.16% | 923.8M | 175.53 | $0.14 | +5.02% |
| BULLW | $5.74 | +3.05% | 806.2M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WHFCL vs BNJ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 110.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while BNJ trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check BNJ's competition here
WHFCL vs SFB Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while SFB trades at $20.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check SFB's competition here
WHFCL vs MGR Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while MGR trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check MGR's competition here
WHFCL vs MGRB Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while MGRB trades at $17.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check MGRB's competition here
WHFCL vs MGRD Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while MGRD trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check MGRD's competition here
WHFCL vs TRINL Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, TRINL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while TRINL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRINL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRINL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to TRINL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check TRINL's competition here
WHFCL vs CGBDL Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while CGBDL trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check CGBDL's competition here
WHFCL vs FCRX Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 923.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while FCRX trades at $24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 175.53. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check FCRX's competition here
WHFCL vs BULLW Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 806.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while BULLW trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BULLW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check BULLW's competition here
WHFCL vs GLADZ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 625.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while GLADZ trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL and GLADZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLADZ's competition here
WHFCL vs SAJ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while SAJ trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check SAJ's competition here
WHFCL vs SAY Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 400.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while SAY trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check SAY's competition here
WHFCL vs SAZ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 400.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while SAZ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check SAZ's competition here
WHFCL vs BTMWW Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while BTMWW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check BTMWW's competition here
WHFCL vs RILYZ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 185.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while RILYZ trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check RILYZ's competition here
WHFCL vs GECCZ Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while GECCZ trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check GECCZ's competition here
WHFCL vs GEGGL Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while GEGGL trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL and GEGGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GEGGL's competition here
WHFCL vs STSB Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while STSB trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check STSB's competition here
WHFCL vs CAS Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while CAS trades at $30.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL and CAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CAS's competition here
WHFCL vs ZBAI Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while ZBAI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check ZBAI's competition here
WHFCL vs HBTA Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while HBTA trades at $26.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 32.13. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL is less volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WHFCL.Check HBTA's competition here
WHFCL vs GJH Comparison August 2025
WHFCL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WHFCL stands at 205.1M. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WHFCL is priced at $25.48, while GJH trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WHFCL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WHFCL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WHFCL and GJH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GJH's competition here