Where Food Comes From, Inc.
Where Food Comes From, Inc. WFCF Peers
See (WFCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFCF | $11.34 | +10.10% | 59.1M | 29.84 | $0.38 | N/A |
| SAP | $295.55 | +0.77% | 344.8B | 52.97 | $5.58 | +0.89% |
| CRM | $270.74 | +1.11% | 258.8B | 42.43 | $6.38 | +0.60% |
| INTU | $772.86 | +1.98% | 215.6B | 63.09 | $12.25 | +0.52% |
| NOW | $1,011.44 | +0.62% | 209.4B | 137.17 | $7.37 | N/A |
| UBER | $93.12 | +2.44% | 194.7B | 16.30 | $5.71 | N/A |
| SHOP | $113.07 | -0.72% | 147.2B | 91.93 | $1.23 | N/A |
| APP | $347.45 | +2.55% | 117.5B | 62.81 | $5.53 | N/A |
| MSTR | $386.44 | -0.57% | 105.7B | -17.37 | -$22.25 | N/A |
| CDNS | $303.69 | +2.07% | 82.9B | 76.88 | $3.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WFCF vs SAP Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 344.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SAP trades at $295.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 52.97. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CRM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 258.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CRM trades at $270.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs INTU Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 215.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while INTU trades at $772.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 63.09. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs NOW Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while NOW trades at $1,011.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 137.17. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs UBER Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while UBER trades at $93.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SHOP Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 147.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SHOP trades at $113.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 91.93. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs APP Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 117.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while APP trades at $347.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 62.81. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APP's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs MSTR Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 105.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while MSTR trades at $386.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CDNS Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CDNS trades at $303.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 76.88. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SNOW Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SNOW trades at $221.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is -52.80. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ADSK Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ADSK trades at $304.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 65.30. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs WDAY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while WDAY trades at $237.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 131.06. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs TEAM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while TEAM trades at $198.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is -120.30. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DDOG Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DDOG trades at $131.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 278.98. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs FICO Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while FICO trades at $1,815.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 78.05. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs TTD Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while TTD trades at $68.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ANSS Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ANSS trades at $343.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs HUBS Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while HUBS trades at $547.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is -1274.22. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HUBS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs STRK Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while STRK trades at $105.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs STRF Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while STRF trades at $104.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs TYL Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while TYL trades at $577.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 86.82. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ZM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ZM trades at $76.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PTC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PTC trades at $169.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 46.58. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SSNC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SSNC trades at $81.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs GWRE Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while GWRE trades at $234.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 546.21. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs GRAB Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while GRAB trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 466.50. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DUOL Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DUOL trades at $398.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 197.36. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs AZPN Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AZPN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DT trades at $54.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs MNDY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while MNDY trades at $305.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 302.50. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BSY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BSY trades at $52.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 67.47. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DOCU Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DOCU trades at $75.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PAYC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PAYC trades at $225.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 32.03. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs QXO Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, QXO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while QXO trades at $21.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas QXO's P/E ratio is -62.03. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to QXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BKI Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs MANH Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while MANH trades at $194.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 55.50. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs XM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CDAY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CDAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs NICE Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while NICE trades at $165.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PCOR Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PCOR trades at $67.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is -78.98. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PCTY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PCTY trades at $177.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs U Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, U has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while U trades at $23.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas U's P/E ratio is -20.91. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to U's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to U. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs TTAN Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while TTAN trades at $106.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DAY Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DAY trades at $55.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is 344.38. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DSGX Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DSGX trades at $102.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 61.87. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ESTC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ESTC trades at $82.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is -79.42. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ESTC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SRAD Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SRAD trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 135.60. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs APPF Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while APPF trades at $229.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 42.78. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs NATI Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SMAR Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CVLT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CVLT trades at $174.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 103.53. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs OTEX Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while OTEX trades at $28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs GTLB Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while GTLB trades at $44.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 491.44. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GTLB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs LYFT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while LYFT trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 105.67. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CWAN Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CWAN trades at $22.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CWAN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs COUP Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs QTWO Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while QTWO trades at $94.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is -278.68. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QTWO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs IDCC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while IDCC trades at $227.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs VERX Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, VERX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while VERX trades at $33.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas VERX's P/E ratio is -117.21. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VERX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to VERX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BULL Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BULL trades at $11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs FROG Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while FROG trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is -61.10. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to FROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ETWO-WT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ETWO-WT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ETWO-WT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ETWO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETWO-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ETWO-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs LIF Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, LIF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while LIF trades at $61.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas LIF's P/E ratio is 470.46. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to LIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BILL Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BILL trades at $45.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is -2264.50. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BILL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PEGA Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PEGA trades at $52.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 48.33. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs GRND Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GRND has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while GRND trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GRND's P/E ratio is -37.33. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GRND's ROE of -2.84%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to GRND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs FRSH Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while FRSH trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is -61.75. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FRSH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CVT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs RUMBW Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, RUMBW has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while RUMBW trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas RUMBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUMBW's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is less volatile compared to RUMBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs INTA Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, INTA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while INTA trades at $51.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas INTA's P/E ratio is -212.83. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INTA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to INTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PYCR Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs RUM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, RUM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while RUM trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas RUM's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RUM's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to RUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs SOUN Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, SOUN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while SOUN trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas SOUN's P/E ratio is -16.26. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SOUN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to SOUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PWSC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ZI Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ZI has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ZI trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ZI's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs RIOT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, RIOT has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while RIOT trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas RIOT's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RIOT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is less volatile compared to RIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs WK Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while WK trades at $65.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas WK's P/E ratio is -56.73. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ZETA Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ZETA trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is -61.30. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs AYX Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BL Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BL trades at $56.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BL's P/E ratio is 40.97. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs KC Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, KC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while KC trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas KC's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to KC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DAVEW Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DAVEW has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DAVEW trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DAVEW's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAVEW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is less volatile compared to DAVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ENV Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs INST Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, INST has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while INST trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas INST's P/E ratio is -63.78. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INST's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to INST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs AGYS Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, AGYS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while AGYS trades at $118.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas AGYS's P/E ratio is 144.22. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AGYS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to AGYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs COMP Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, COMP has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while COMP trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas COMP's P/E ratio is -48.54. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COMP's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to COMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CALX Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CALX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CALX trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CALX's P/E ratio is -96.35. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CALX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs DAVE Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while DAVE trades at $243.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 67.96. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs NCNO Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, NCNO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while NCNO trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas NCNO's P/E ratio is -109.48. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NCNO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to NCNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ASAN Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ASAN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ASAN trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ASAN's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASAN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ASAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BLKB Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BLKB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BLKB trades at $64.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BLKB's P/E ratio is -11.47. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLKB's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BLKB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ALKT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ALKT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ALKT trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ALKT's P/E ratio is -81.38. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALKT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ALKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs CLSK Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, CLSK has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while CLSK trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas CLSK's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CLSK's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to CLSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs GBTG Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while GBTG trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is -63.35. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GBTG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ALIT Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ALIT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ALIT trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ALIT's P/E ratio is -94.00. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALIT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ALIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs BRZE Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, BRZE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while BRZE trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas BRZE's P/E ratio is -26.48. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRZE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to BRZE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs ALRM Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, ALRM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while ALRM trades at $56.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas ALRM's P/E ratio is 23.80. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ALRM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to ALRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PAR Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PAR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PAR trades at $67.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PAR's P/E ratio is -26.60. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.
WFCF vs PRGS Comparison
WFCF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFCF stands at 59.1M. In comparison, PRGS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFCF is priced at $11.34, while PRGS trades at $63.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.84, whereas PRGS's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, WFCF's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRGS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFCF is more volatile compared to PRGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFCF.