Webjet Limited
Webjet Limited (WEBJF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WEBJF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBJF | $0.93 | +0.00% | 1B | 9.30 | $0.10 | N/A |
| TRPCF | $62.50 | +0.00% | 40.8B | 18.33 | $3.41 | +0.48% |
| AMADF | $81.43 | +2.83% | 35.9B | 24.02 | $3.39 | +1.75% |
| AMADY | $80.64 | +0.34% | 34.8B | 23.43 | $3.43 | +1.42% |
| TNGCF | $2.30 | +0.00% | 5.3B | 19.17 | $0.12 | N/A |
| DRTGF | $22.69 | +0.00% | 4.6B | 8.19 | $2.77 | +0.86% |
| TUIFF | $8.94 | +0.00% | 4.5B | 7.45 | $1.20 | N/A |
| LGDDF | $22.68 | +0.00% | 3.2B | 13.19 | $1.72 | +3.35% |
| FGETF | $8.10 | +0.00% | 1.8B | 23.82 | $0.34 | +3.42% |
| TNLIY | $6.81 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 20.03 | $0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WEBJF vs TRPCF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, TRPCF has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while TRPCF trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas TRPCF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRPCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to TRPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check TRPCF's competition here
WEBJF vs AMADF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, AMADF has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while AMADF trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas AMADF's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMADF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to AMADF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check AMADF's competition here
WEBJF vs AMADY Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, AMADY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while AMADY trades at $80.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas AMADY's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AMADY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to AMADY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check AMADY's competition here
WEBJF vs TNGCF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, TNGCF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while TNGCF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas TNGCF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TNGCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to TNGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check TNGCF's competition here
WEBJF vs DRTGF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, DRTGF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while DRTGF trades at $22.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas DRTGF's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DRTGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to DRTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check DRTGF's competition here
WEBJF vs TUIFF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, TUIFF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while TUIFF trades at $8.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas TUIFF's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TUIFF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to TUIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check TUIFF's competition here
WEBJF vs LGDDF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, LGDDF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while LGDDF trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LGDDF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LGDDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to LGDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check LGDDF's competition here
WEBJF vs FGETF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, FGETF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while FGETF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas FGETF's P/E ratio is 23.82. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FGETF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to FGETF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check FGETF's competition here
WEBJF vs TNLIY Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, TNLIY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while TNLIY trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas TNLIY's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TNLIY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to TNLIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check TNLIY's competition here
WEBJF vs CTMLF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, CTMLF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while CTMLF trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CTMLF's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CTMLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to CTMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check CTMLF's competition here
WEBJF vs EDDRF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, EDDRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while EDDRF trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas EDDRF's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EDDRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to EDDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check EDDRF's competition here
WEBJF vs WEJTY Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, WEJTY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while WEJTY trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas WEJTY's P/E ratio is 142.50. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WEJTY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to WEJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check WEJTY's competition here
WEBJF vs OOBHF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, OOBHF has a market cap of 641.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while OOBHF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas OOBHF's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OOBHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to OOBHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check OOBHF's competition here
WEBJF vs EOVBF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, EOVBF has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while EOVBF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas EOVBF's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EOVBF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to EOVBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check EOVBF's competition here
WEBJF vs LSMNF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, LSMNF has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while LSMNF trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas LSMNF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LSMNF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to LSMNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check LSMNF's competition here
WEBJF vs HSWLF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, HSWLF has a market cap of 189.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while HSWLF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas HSWLF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HSWLF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to HSWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check HSWLF's competition here
WEBJF vs TRZBF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, TRZBF has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while TRZBF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas TRZBF's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRZBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to TRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check TRZBF's competition here
WEBJF vs HWGG Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, HWGG has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while HWGG trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas HWGG's P/E ratio is -235.00. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HWGG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to HWGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check HWGG's competition here
WEBJF vs ONVC Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, ONVC has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while ONVC trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas ONVC's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ONVC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to ONVC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check ONVC's competition here
WEBJF vs ZMWYF Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, ZMWYF has a market cap of 992.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while ZMWYF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas ZMWYF's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ZMWYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to ZMWYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check ZMWYF's competition here
WEBJF vs NNAX Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, NNAX has a market cap of 330.3K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while NNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas NNAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NNAX's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to NNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check NNAX's competition here
WEBJF vs CDNO Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, CDNO has a market cap of 158.9K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while CDNO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas CDNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CDNO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to CDNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check CDNO's competition here
WEBJF vs GWYT Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, GWYT has a market cap of 17.7K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while GWYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas GWYT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GWYT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is less volatile compared to GWYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check GWYT's competition here
WEBJF vs WESC Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, WESC has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while WESC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas WESC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WESC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to WESC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check WESC's competition here
WEBJF vs ARMV Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, ARMV has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while ARMV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas ARMV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARMV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is less volatile compared to ARMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check ARMV's competition here
WEBJF vs OHTR Comparison August 2025
WEBJF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBJF stands at 1B. In comparison, OHTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WEBJF is priced at $0.93, while OHTR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBJF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.30, whereas OHTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBJF's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OHTR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBJF is more volatile compared to OHTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBJF.Check OHTR's competition here