Webco Industries, Inc.
Webco Industries, Inc. (WEBC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WEBC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEBC | $187.00 | +0.00% | 152M | 5.63 | $33.19 | N/A |
| AMSYF | $31.63 | -6.70% | 24.3B | 20.15 | $1.57 | +1.66% |
| VLOWY | $3.89 | +3.18% | 22.8B | 11.11 | $0.35 | +8.62% |
| NISTF | $20.50 | -2.38% | 21.4B | 9.03 | $2.27 | +5.57% |
| NPSCY | $6.51 | -0.76% | 20.4B | 8.57 | $0.76 | +3.67% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +632.31% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.54% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| CISXF | $14.90 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 106.43 | $0.14 | +1.54% |
| JFEEF | $11.40 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 12.26 | $0.93 | +5.95% |
Stock Comparison
WEBC vs AMSYF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while AMSYF trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and AMSYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMSYF's competition here
WEBC vs VLOWY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while VLOWY trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check VLOWY's competition here
WEBC vs NISTF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while NISTF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check NISTF's competition here
WEBC vs NPSCY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while NPSCY trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check NPSCY's competition here
WEBC vs SVJTY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and SVJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVJTY's competition here
WEBC vs TATLY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and TATLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATLY's competition here
WEBC vs HMTLY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and HMTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLY's competition here
WEBC vs CISXF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CISXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check CISXF's competition here
WEBC vs JFEEF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check JFEEF's competition here
WEBC vs BLSFF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while BLSFF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check BLSFF's competition here
WEBC vs BLSFY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while BLSFY trades at $76.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and BLSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLSFY's competition here
WEBC vs KUMBF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and KUMBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KUMBF's competition here
WEBC vs SSAAF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SSAAF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SSAAF's competition here
WEBC vs SSAAY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SSAAY trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SSAAY's competition here
WEBC vs KIROY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while KIROY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check KIROY's competition here
WEBC vs VLOUF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while VLOUF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and VLOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLOUF's competition here
WEBC vs KBSTF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while KBSTF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and KBSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBSTF's competition here
WEBC vs ICHBF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and ICHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHBF's competition here
WEBC vs VLPNF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check VLPNF's competition here
WEBC vs OUTKY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while OUTKY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check OUTKY's competition here
WEBC vs YMTKF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and YMTKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YMTKF's competition here
WEBC vs ANIOY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ANIOY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and ANIOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ANIOY's competition here
WEBC vs STZHF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and STZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STZHF's competition here
WEBC vs MAANF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while MAANF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check MAANF's competition here
WEBC vs APMSF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and APMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMSF's competition here
WEBC vs SMSMY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SMSMY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SMSMY's competition here
WEBC vs APEMY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while APEMY trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check APEMY's competition here
WEBC vs ANGGF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check ANGGF's competition here
WEBC vs SMUPF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SMUPF trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -85.27. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SMUPF's competition here
WEBC vs EVRZF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and EVRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRZF's competition here
WEBC vs MCHIF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and MCHIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCHIF's competition here
WEBC vs CIAFF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CIAFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check CIAFF's competition here
WEBC vs SZGPF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SZGPF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and SZGPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZGPF's competition here
WEBC vs OUTFF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check OUTFF's competition here
WEBC vs SZGPY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SZGPY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SZGPY's competition here
WEBC vs CKSNF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CKSNF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check CKSNF's competition here
WEBC vs CKSNY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CKSNY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and CKSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CKSNY's competition here
WEBC vs CUGCY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CUGCY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and CUGCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUGCY's competition here
WEBC vs LIFZF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while LIFZF trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check LIFZF's competition here
WEBC vs SYPLF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check SYPLF's competition here
WEBC vs USNZY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 913.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while USNZY trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check USNZY's competition here
WEBC vs KLKNF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and KLKNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLKNF's competition here
WEBC vs ERELY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 756.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ERELY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check ERELY's competition here
WEBC vs CUGCF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check CUGCF's competition here
WEBC vs YDWAF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check YDWAF's competition here
WEBC vs FEEXY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while FEEXY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check FEEXY's competition here
WEBC vs OSKXF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 397.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check OSKXF's competition here
WEBC vs FEEXF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and FEEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FEEXF's competition here
WEBC vs MTGRY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 292.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while MTGRY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check MTGRY's competition here
WEBC vs MTGRF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while MTGRF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check MTGRF's competition here
WEBC vs AMSIY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check AMSIY's competition here
WEBC vs VLPNY Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 182.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while VLPNY trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 25.71. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check VLPNY's competition here
WEBC vs GRRLF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check GRRLF's competition here
WEBC vs ARCXF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check ARCXF's competition here
WEBC vs TWIRF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while TWIRF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and TWIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWIRF's competition here
WEBC vs IRNRF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WEBC.Check IRNRF's competition here
WEBC vs GSIH Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and GSIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GSIH's competition here
WEBC vs HMTLF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and HMTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLF's competition here
WEBC vs NPSTF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. WEBC has daily volatility of 0.00 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here
WEBC vs CWRN Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and CWRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWRN's competition here
WEBC vs ZNGGF Comparison July 2025
WEBC plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WEBC stands at 152M. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WEBC is priced at $187.00, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WEBC currently has a P/E ratio of 5.63, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, WEBC's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WEBC and ZNGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZNGGF's competition here