Kumba Iron Ore Limited (KUMBF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KUMBF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUMBF | $19.77 | +0.00% | 6.3B | 7.09 | $2.79 | +9.42% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | +0.00% | 115.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.54% |
| NPSCY | $3.41 | -0.87% | 53.8B | 171.50 | $0.02 | +5.20% |
| AMSYF | $65.37 | +0.00% | 49.8B | 17.11 | $3.82 | +0.88% |
| VLOWY | $5.70 | -0.73% | 33.4B | 18.40 | $0.31 | N/A |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | N/A |
| NISTF | $3.38 | -0.59% | 17.7B | 169.00 | $0.02 | +14.23% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| CISXF | $14.90 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 106.43 | $0.14 | +1.45% |
| SSAAY | $5.30 | +1.92% | 10.6B | 18.28 | $0.29 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
KUMBF vs TATLY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to TATLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check TATLY's competition here
KUMBF vs NPSCY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while NPSCY trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 171.50. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check NPSCY's competition here
KUMBF vs AMSYF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while AMSYF trades at $65.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check AMSYF's competition here
KUMBF vs VLOWY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while VLOWY trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check VLOWY's competition here
KUMBF vs SVJTY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SVJTY's competition here
KUMBF vs NISTF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while NISTF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check NISTF's competition here
KUMBF vs HMTLY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to HMTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check HMTLY's competition here
KUMBF vs CISXF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CISXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CISXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CISXF's competition here
KUMBF vs SSAAY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SSAAY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SSAAY's competition here
KUMBF vs BLSFY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while BLSFY trades at $111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 54.15. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to BLSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check BLSFY's competition here
KUMBF vs VLPNY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while VLPNY trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check VLPNY's competition here
KUMBF vs SSAAF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SSAAF trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SSAAF's competition here
KUMBF vs BLSFF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while BLSFF trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 163.75. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check BLSFF's competition here
KUMBF vs VLPNF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while VLPNF trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check VLPNF's competition here
KUMBF vs JFEEF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while JFEEF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check JFEEF's competition here
KUMBF vs VLOUF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while VLOUF trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check VLOUF's competition here
KUMBF vs TKMCY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TKMCY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while TKMCY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas TKMCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TKMCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to TKMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check TKMCY's competition here
KUMBF vs OUTKY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while OUTKY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -21.56. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check OUTKY's competition here
KUMBF vs KIROY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while KIROY trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check KIROY's competition here
KUMBF vs KBSTF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while KBSTF trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check KBSTF's competition here
KUMBF vs ANIOY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ANIOY trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is -92.20. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ANIOY's competition here
KUMBF vs APEMY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while APEMY trades at $59.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 126.45. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check APEMY's competition here
KUMBF vs SZGPF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SZGPF trades at $76.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -17.85. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SZGPF's competition here
KUMBF vs ICHBF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to ICHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ICHBF's competition here
KUMBF vs SZGPY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SZGPY trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -16.49. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SZGPY's competition here
KUMBF vs SMSMY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SMSMY trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -88.64. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SMSMY's competition here
KUMBF vs SMUPF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SMUPF trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -88.86. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SMUPF's competition here
KUMBF vs MTGRY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while MTGRY trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check MTGRY's competition here
KUMBF vs APMSF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while APMSF trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 93.13. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to APMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check APMSF's competition here
KUMBF vs OUTFF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while OUTFF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -19.94. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check OUTFF's competition here
KUMBF vs YMTKF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check YMTKF's competition here
KUMBF vs MAANF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while MAANF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check MAANF's competition here
KUMBF vs STZHF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to STZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check STZHF's competition here
KUMBF vs USNZY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while USNZY trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to USNZY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check USNZY's competition here
KUMBF vs EVRZF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to EVRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check EVRZF's competition here
KUMBF vs CIAFF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CIAFF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CIAFF's competition here
KUMBF vs MCHIF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while MCHIF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check MCHIF's competition here
KUMBF vs CKSNY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CKSNY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CKSNY's competition here
KUMBF vs KLKNF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while KLKNF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -40.29. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check KLKNF's competition here
KUMBF vs ANGGF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ANGGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ANGGF's competition here
KUMBF vs LIFZF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while LIFZF trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check LIFZF's competition here
KUMBF vs ERELY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ERELY trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 459.00. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ERELY's competition here
KUMBF vs CKSNF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CKSNF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CKSNF's competition here
KUMBF vs SYPLF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check SYPLF's competition here
KUMBF vs CUGCY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 781.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CUGCY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CUGCY's competition here
KUMBF vs CUGCF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CUGCF's competition here
KUMBF vs YDWAF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 660.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check YDWAF's competition here
KUMBF vs OSKXF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 473M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while OSKXF trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check OSKXF's competition here
KUMBF vs MTGRF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 305.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while MTGRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check MTGRF's competition here
KUMBF vs AMSIY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check AMSIY's competition here
KUMBF vs FEEXY Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while FEEXY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check FEEXY's competition here
KUMBF vs FEEXF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 228.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while FEEXF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check FEEXF's competition here
KUMBF vs WEBC Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while WEBC trades at $307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check WEBC's competition here
KUMBF vs GRRLF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check GRRLF's competition here
KUMBF vs ARCXF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ARCXF's competition here
KUMBF vs ZNGGF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to ZNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check ZNGGF's competition here
KUMBF vs TWIRF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while TWIRF trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check TWIRF's competition here
KUMBF vs IRNRF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while IRNRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check IRNRF's competition here
KUMBF vs GSIH Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 13.8K. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is less volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check GSIH's competition here
KUMBF vs CWRN Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to CWRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check CWRN's competition here
KUMBF vs NPSTF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KUMBF has daily volatility of 12.12 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here
KUMBF vs HMTLF Comparison June 2026
KUMBF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KUMBF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KUMBF is priced at $19.77, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KUMBF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.09, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, KUMBF's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KUMBF is more volatile compared to HMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KUMBF.Check HMTLF's competition here