Vesuvius plc
Vesuvius plc (CKSNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CKSNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKSNF | $4.42 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 11.63 | $0.38 | +7.09% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | +0.00% | 115.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.54% |
| NPSCY | $3.68 | -1.08% | 58B | -370.00 | -$0.01 | +3.28% |
| AMSYF | $55.95 | +15.12% | 42.6B | 14.65 | $3.82 | +1.25% |
| VLOWY | $5.92 | -4.21% | 34.6B | 17.91 | $0.33 | +5.73% |
| NISTF | $3.70 | +1.93% | 19.3B | -370.00 | -$0.01 | +13.19% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | N/A |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| CISXF | $14.90 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 106.43 | $0.14 | +1.45% |
| BLSFY | $113.30 | +2.97% | 9.9B | 55.54 | $2.04 | +7.06% |
Stock Comparison
CKSNF vs TATLY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 115.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and TATLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TATLY's competition here
CKSNF vs NPSCY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while NPSCY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is -370.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check NPSCY's competition here
CKSNF vs AMSYF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while AMSYF trades at $55.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check AMSYF's competition here
CKSNF vs VLOWY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while VLOWY trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check VLOWY's competition here
CKSNF vs NISTF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while NISTF trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is -370.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NISTF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check NISTF's competition here
CKSNF vs SVJTY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and SVJTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVJTY's competition here
CKSNF vs HMTLY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and HMTLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLY's competition here
CKSNF vs CISXF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CISXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CISXF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check CISXF's competition here
CKSNF vs BLSFY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while BLSFY trades at $113.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and BLSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLSFY's competition here
CKSNF vs SSAAY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SSAAY trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and SSAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSAAY's competition here
CKSNF vs VLPNY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while VLPNY trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and VLPNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLPNY's competition here
CKSNF vs SSAAF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SSAAF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and SSAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SSAAF's competition here
CKSNF vs BLSFF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while BLSFF trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 162.92. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and BLSFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLSFF's competition here
CKSNF vs VLPNF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while VLPNF trades at $47.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and VLPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLPNF's competition here
CKSNF vs VLOUF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while VLOUF trades at $30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and VLOUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VLOUF's competition here
CKSNF vs JFEEF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while JFEEF trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and JFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JFEEF's competition here
CKSNF vs KIROY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while KIROY trades at $6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check KIROY's competition here
CKSNF vs KUMBF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while KUMBF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check KUMBF's competition here
CKSNF vs OUTKY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while OUTKY trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check OUTKY's competition here
CKSNF vs KBSTF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while KBSTF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and KBSTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KBSTF's competition here
CKSNF vs ICHBF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and ICHBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ICHBF's competition here
CKSNF vs ANIOY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ANIOY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is -90.67. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check ANIOY's competition here
CKSNF vs MAANF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while MAANF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check MAANF's competition here
CKSNF vs APEMY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while APEMY trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 320.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check APEMY's competition here
CKSNF vs MTGRY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while MTGRY trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -14.12. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check MTGRY's competition here
CKSNF vs APMSF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while APMSF trades at $44.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 298.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and APMSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APMSF's competition here
CKSNF vs OUTFF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while OUTFF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check OUTFF's competition here
CKSNF vs YMTKF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check YMTKF's competition here
CKSNF vs SMSMY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SMSMY trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -69.55. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check SMSMY's competition here
CKSNF vs SZGPF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SZGPF trades at $53.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check SZGPF's competition here
CKSNF vs SZGPY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SZGPY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and SZGPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SZGPY's competition here
CKSNF vs STZHF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and STZHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STZHF's competition here
CKSNF vs SMUPF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SMUPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -59.09. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and SMUPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMUPF's competition here
CKSNF vs ANGGF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ANGGF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check ANGGF's competition here
CKSNF vs USNZY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while USNZY trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USNZY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check USNZY's competition here
CKSNF vs CIAFF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CIAFF trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and CIAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIAFF's competition here
CKSNF vs EVRZF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and EVRZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EVRZF's competition here
CKSNF vs MCHIF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while MCHIF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check MCHIF's competition here
CKSNF vs CKSNY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CKSNY trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check CKSNY's competition here
CKSNF vs KLKNF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while KLKNF trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -22.38. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check KLKNF's competition here
CKSNF vs LIFZF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while LIFZF trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check LIFZF's competition here
CKSNF vs SYPLF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check SYPLF's competition here
CKSNF vs ERELY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 924.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ERELY trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 344.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check ERELY's competition here
CKSNF vs CUGCY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 781.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CUGCY trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 24.71. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and CUGCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUGCY's competition here
CKSNF vs CUGCF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check CUGCF's competition here
CKSNF vs YDWAF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 673.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check YDWAF's competition here
CKSNF vs OSKXF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while OSKXF trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 1792.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check OSKXF's competition here
CKSNF vs MTGRF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 305.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while MTGRF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and MTGRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTGRF's competition here
CKSNF vs AMSIY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check AMSIY's competition here
CKSNF vs FEEXY Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while FEEXY trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and FEEXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FEEXY's competition here
CKSNF vs FEEXF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 228.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while FEEXF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check FEEXF's competition here
CKSNF vs WEBC Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 179.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while WEBC trades at $255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 6.09. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and WEBC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WEBC's competition here
CKSNF vs GRRLF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 156.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while GRRLF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.50. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check GRRLF's competition here
CKSNF vs ARCXF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 65.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -8.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check ARCXF's competition here
CKSNF vs ZNGGF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and ZNGGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZNGGF's competition here
CKSNF vs TWIRF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while TWIRF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check TWIRF's competition here
CKSNF vs IRNRF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and IRNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IRNRF's competition here
CKSNF vs GSIH Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 13.8K. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF is less volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CKSNF.Check GSIH's competition here
CKSNF vs NPSTF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CKSNF has daily volatility of 0.00 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here
CKSNF vs HMTLF Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and HMTLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HMTLF's competition here
CKSNF vs CWRN Comparison May 2026
CKSNF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CKSNF stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CKSNF is priced at $4.42, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CKSNF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CKSNF's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CKSNF and CWRN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CWRN's competition here