Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Velodyne Lidar, Inc. VLDRW Peers
See (VLDRW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Hardware, Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLDRW | $0.32 | N/A | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| APH | $92.53 | +0.67% | 111.9B | 44.92 | $2.06 | +0.66% |
| TEL | $162.36 | +0.18% | 48.1B | 35.30 | $4.60 | +1.63% |
| GLW | $50.86 | +0.20% | 43.6B | 97.81 | $0.52 | +2.20% |
| GRMN | $205.43 | +0.23% | 39.6B | 27.07 | $7.59 | +1.45% |
| IIVI | $227.08 | +5.49% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| KEYS | $159.84 | -0.76% | 27.5B | 37.61 | $4.25 | N/A |
| FTV | $71.75 | -0.24% | 24.4B | 31.47 | $2.28 | +0.45% |
| TDY | $499.95 | +0.37% | 23.4B | 28.63 | $17.46 | N/A |
| JBL | $172.64 | +0.39% | 18.5B | 38.88 | $4.44 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
VLDRW vs APH Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, APH has a market cap of 111.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while APH trades at $92.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas APH's P/E ratio is 44.92. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to APH's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to APH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs TEL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, TEL has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while TEL trades at $162.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEL's P/E ratio is 35.30. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TEL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to TEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs GLW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, GLW has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while GLW trades at $50.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLW's P/E ratio is 97.81. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to GLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs GRMN Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, GRMN has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while GRMN trades at $205.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRMN's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GRMN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to GRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs IIVI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, IIVI has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while IIVI trades at $227.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIVI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to IIVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to IIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs KEYS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, KEYS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while KEYS trades at $159.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KEYS's P/E ratio is 37.61. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to KEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs FTV Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, FTV has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while FTV trades at $71.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTV's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FTV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to FTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs TDY Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, TDY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while TDY trades at $499.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to TDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs JBL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, JBL has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while JBL trades at $172.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBL's P/E ratio is 38.88. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to JBL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to JBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs TRMB Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, TRMB has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while TRMB trades at $71.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRMB's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TRMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to TRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs FLEX Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, FLEX has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while FLEX trades at $42.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLEX's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FLEX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to FLEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs CLS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, CLS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while CLS trades at $119.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLS's P/E ratio is 33.24. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CLS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to CLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs COHR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, COHR has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while COHR trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COHR's P/E ratio is -361.82. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to COHR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to COHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs FN Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, FN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while FN trades at $237.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FN's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to FN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BMI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BMI has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BMI trades at $248.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BMI's P/E ratio is 54.54. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BMI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to BMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MKSI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MKSI has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MKSI trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKSI's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MKSI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MKSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SNDK Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SNDK has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SNDK trades at $39.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNDK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SNDK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SNDK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ITRI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ITRI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ITRI trades at $119.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ITRI's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ITRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ITRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs VNT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, VNT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while VNT trades at $35.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VNT's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VNT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to VNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LFUS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LFUS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LFUS trades at $214.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFUS's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LFUS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LFUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs CGNX Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, CGNX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while CGNX trades at $30.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGNX's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CGNX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to CGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ESE Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ESE has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ESE trades at $180.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ESE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SANM Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SANM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SANM trades at $86.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SANM's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SANM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs NOVT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, NOVT has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while NOVT trades at $126.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NOVT's P/E ratio is 64.78. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to NOVT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to NOVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ST Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ST has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ST trades at $26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ST's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ST's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OSIS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OSIS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OSIS trades at $222.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OSIS's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OSIS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to OSIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs PLXS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, PLXS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while PLXS trades at $131.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLXS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PLXS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to PLXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs TTMI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, TTMI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while TTMI trades at $32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTMI's P/E ratio is 42.81. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TTMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to TTMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs VICR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, VICR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while VICR trades at $44.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VICR's P/E ratio is 83.47. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VICR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to VICR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BHE Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BHE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BHE trades at $37.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHE's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BHE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to BHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs CTS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, CTS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while CTS trades at $41.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CTS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to CTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ROG Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ROG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ROG trades at $66.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROG's P/E ratio is 73.76. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ROG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ROG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs PENG Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, PENG has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while PENG trades at $19.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PENG's P/E ratio is -112.03. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to PENG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to PENG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BELFA Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BELFA has a market cap of 926.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BELFA trades at $66.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFA's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BELFA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to BELFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BELFB Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BELFB has a market cap of 921M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BELFB trades at $74.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BELFB's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BELFB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to BELFB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs FARO Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, FARO has a market cap of 815.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while FARO trades at $42.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FARO's P/E ratio is -1060.50. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FARO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to FARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OUST Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OUST has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OUST trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST's P/E ratio is -7.06. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OUST's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to OUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OUST-WTA Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OUST-WTA has a market cap of 709.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OUST-WTA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OUST-WTA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to OUST-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs DAKT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, DAKT has a market cap of 676.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while DAKT trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAKT's P/E ratio is 338.75. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DAKT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to DAKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OST Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OST has a market cap of 601.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OST trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OST's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OST's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to OST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs AMOT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, AMOT has a market cap of 550.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while AMOT trades at $34.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOT's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to AMOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to AMOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MLAB Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MLAB has a market cap of 546M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MLAB trades at $100.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLAB's P/E ratio is -278.00. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MLAB's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ALNT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ALNT has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ALNT trades at $31.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALNT's P/E ratio is 54.26. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ALNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ALNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LYTS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LYTS has a market cap of 481.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LYTS trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LYTS's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LYTS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LYTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OUST-WT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OUST-WT has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OUST-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUST-WT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OUST-WT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to OUST-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BKSY-WT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BKSY-WT has a market cap of 454.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BKSY-WT trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BKSY-WT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to BKSY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BKSY Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BKSY has a market cap of 383.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BKSY trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKSY's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BKSY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to BKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SATL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SATL has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SATL trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATL's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SATL's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to SATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs VPG Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, VPG has a market cap of 363.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while VPG trades at $27.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VPG's P/E ratio is 119.13. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VPG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to VPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SATLW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SATLW has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SATLW trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SATLW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SATLW's ROE of +5.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SATLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs KULR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, KULR has a market cap of 331.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while KULR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KULR's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KULR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to KULR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs VLDR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, VLDR has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while VLDR trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLDR's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VLDR's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to VLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MEI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MEI has a market cap of 285.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MEI trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEI's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MEI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MVIS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MVIS has a market cap of 274.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MVIS trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MVIS's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MVIS's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MVIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs KOPN Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 240.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while KOPN trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to KOPN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs EMAN Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, EMAN has a market cap of 172.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while EMAN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAN's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to EMAN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to EMAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs NEON Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, NEON has a market cap of 168.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while NEON trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEON's P/E ratio is -27.08. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to NEON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to NEON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MPTI Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MPTI has a market cap of 131.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MPTI trades at $45.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPTI's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MPTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MPTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs RELL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, RELL has a market cap of 127.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while RELL trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELL's P/E ratio is -60.03. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to RELL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to RELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LPTH Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LPTH has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LPTH trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPTH's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LPTH's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LPTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs WBX Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, WBX has a market cap of 90.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while WBX trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBX's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WBX's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to WBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ODYS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ODYS has a market cap of 84.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ODYS trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ODYS's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ODYS's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ODYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs GNSS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, GNSS has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while GNSS trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNSS's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to GNSS's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to GNSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs WRAP Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, WRAP has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while WRAP trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRAP's P/E ratio is -8.75. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WRAP's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to WRAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs REFR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, REFR has a market cap of 67M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while REFR trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFR's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to REFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to REFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ELTK Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ELTK has a market cap of 65.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ELTK trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELTK's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ELTK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ELTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LINK Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LINK has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LINK trades at $5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINK's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LINK's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LINK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SOTK Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SOTK has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SOTK trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOTK's P/E ratio is 45.63. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SOTK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SOTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OPTX Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OPTX has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OPTX trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTX's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OPTX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to OPTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MIND Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MIND has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MIND trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIND's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MIND's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MIND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SELX Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SELX has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SELX trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELX's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SELX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SELX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs CPSH Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, CPSH has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while CPSH trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPSH's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to CPSH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to CPSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs DSWL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, DSWL has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while DSWL trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSWL's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DSWL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to DSWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LGL Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LGL has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LGL trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGL's P/E ratio is 83.38. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LGL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ISNS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ISNS has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ISNS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISNS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ISNS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ISNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs FCUV Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, FCUV has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while FCUV trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCUV's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to FCUV's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to FCUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs DAIO Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, DAIO has a market cap of 25.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while DAIO trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAIO's P/E ratio is -9.20. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to DAIO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to DAIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs HOLO Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, HOLO has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while HOLO trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HOLO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to HOLO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to HOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs TMPOW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, TMPOW has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while TMPOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to TMPOW's ROE of +5.57%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to TMPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs NSYS Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, NSYS has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while NSYS trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSYS's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to NSYS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to NSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LUNA Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LUNA has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LUNA trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUNA's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LUNA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to LUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MTEK Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MTEK has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MTEK trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEK's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MTEK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to MTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SGMA Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SGMA has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SGMA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGMA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SGMA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SGMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SVRE Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SVRE has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SVRE trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVRE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SVRE's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to SVRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs VIAO Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, VIAO has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while VIAO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VIAO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to VIAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to VIAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs ELSE Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, ELSE has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while ELSE trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELSE's P/E ratio is 39.18. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to ELSE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to ELSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs WATT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, WATT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while WATT trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WATT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to WATT's ROE of -5.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to WATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SLNHP Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SLNHP has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SLNHP trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNHP's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SLNHP's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SLNHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SLNH Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SLNH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SLNH trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SLNH's ROE of -15.72%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to SLNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SVREW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SVREW has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SVREW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVREW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SVREW's ROE of -3.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SVREW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs SOBR Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, SOBR has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while SOBR trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBR's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to SOBR's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to SOBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs BNSO Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, BNSO has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while BNSO trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNSO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to BNSO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to BNSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MINDP Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MINDP has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MINDP trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINDP's P/E ratio is -10.89. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MINDP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MINDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OUSTZ Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OUSTZ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OUSTZ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OUSTZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OUSTZ's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to OUSTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs IMTE Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, IMTE has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while IMTE trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMTE's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to IMTE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to IMTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MMAT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MMAT has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MMAT trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MMAT's ROE of -4.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to MMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs OPTXW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, OPTXW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while OPTXW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OPTXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to OPTXW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to OPTXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs MTEKW Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, MTEKW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while MTEKW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTEKW's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to MTEKW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is more volatile compared to MTEKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.
VLDRW vs LGL-WT Comparison
VLDRW plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VLDRW stands at 0. In comparison, LGL-WT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VLDRW is priced at $0.32, while LGL-WT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VLDRW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VLDRW's ROE is -0.66%, compared to LGL-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VLDRW is less volatile compared to LGL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VLDRW.