V.I.P. Industries Limited
V.I.P. Industries Limited (VIPIND.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (VIPIND.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIPIND.NS | ₹355.65 | -3.36% | 52.9B | -26.97 | -₹13.80 | N/A |
| METROBRAND.NS | ₹1,055.80 | +1.91% | 285.3B | 73.24 | ₹14.30 | +1.91% |
| BATAINDIA.BO | ₹825.60 | +1.68% | 104.4B | 61.32 | ₹13.25 | +1.11% |
| BATAINDIA.NS | ₹825.50 | +1.68% | 104.4B | 58.53 | ₹13.88 | +1.11% |
| SAFARI.BO | ₹1,847.25 | +0.29% | 91.5B | 54.51 | ₹34.26 | N/A |
| SAFARI.NS | ₹1,845.70 | +0.51% | 91.4B | 54.36 | ₹34.34 | +0.19% |
| RELAXO.NS | ₹365.35 | +2.07% | 88.8B | 53.10 | ₹6.72 | +0.84% |
| RELAXO.BO | ₹364.80 | +2.27% | 88.7B | 52.89 | ₹6.74 | +0.84% |
| CAMPUS.NS | ₹268.15 | +1.11% | 82.3B | 58.38 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
| CAMPUS.BO | ₹268.05 | +1.40% | 82.2B | 58.35 | ₹4.61 | +0.11% |
Stock Comparison
VIPIND.NS vs METROBRAND.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, METROBRAND.NS has a market cap of 285.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while METROBRAND.NS trades at ₹1,055.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas METROBRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 73.24. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to METROBRAND.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to METROBRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check METROBRAND.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BATAINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.BO has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BATAINDIA.BO trades at ₹825.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BATAINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.32. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BATAINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BATAINDIA.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BATAINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BATAINDIA.NS has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BATAINDIA.NS trades at ₹825.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BATAINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.53. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BATAINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BATAINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BATAINDIA.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SAFARI.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SAFARI.BO has a market cap of 91.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SAFARI.BO trades at ₹1,847.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SAFARI.BO's P/E ratio is 54.51. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SAFARI.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SAFARI.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SAFARI.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SAFARI.NS has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SAFARI.NS trades at ₹1,845.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SAFARI.NS's P/E ratio is 54.36. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SAFARI.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SAFARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SAFARI.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs RELAXO.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, RELAXO.NS has a market cap of 88.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while RELAXO.NS trades at ₹365.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas RELAXO.NS's P/E ratio is 53.10. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RELAXO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check RELAXO.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs RELAXO.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, RELAXO.BO has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while RELAXO.BO trades at ₹364.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas RELAXO.BO's P/E ratio is 52.89. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RELAXO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to RELAXO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check RELAXO.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs CAMPUS.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, CAMPUS.NS has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while CAMPUS.NS trades at ₹268.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas CAMPUS.NS's P/E ratio is 58.38. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CAMPUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check CAMPUS.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs CAMPUS.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, CAMPUS.BO has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while CAMPUS.BO trades at ₹268.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas CAMPUS.BO's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CAMPUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to CAMPUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check CAMPUS.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs REDTAPE.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, REDTAPE.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while REDTAPE.BO trades at ₹124.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas REDTAPE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.41. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to REDTAPE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to REDTAPE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check REDTAPE.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs VIPIND.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, VIPIND.BO has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while VIPIND.BO trades at ₹356.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas VIPIND.BO's P/E ratio is -26.98. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VIPIND.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to VIPIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check VIPIND.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BIL.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BIL.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BIL.NS trades at ₹851.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BIL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BIL.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BIL.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BIL.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BIL.BO trades at ₹855.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BIL.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BIZOTIC.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BIZOTIC.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BIZOTIC.BO trades at ₹989.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BIZOTIC.BO's P/E ratio is 76.81. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BIZOTIC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BIZOTIC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BIZOTIC.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs MIRZAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while MIRZAINT.NS trades at ₹35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas MIRZAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 57.00. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MIRZAINT.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check MIRZAINT.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs MIRZAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, MIRZAINT.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while MIRZAINT.BO trades at ₹35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas MIRZAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 56.94. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MIRZAINT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to MIRZAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check MIRZAINT.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SREEL.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SREEL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SREEL.NS trades at ₹201.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SREEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SREEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SREEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SREEL.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SREEL.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SREEL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SREEL.BO trades at ₹201.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SREEL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SREEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SREEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SREEL.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs MANBRO.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, MANBRO.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while MANBRO.BO trades at ₹760.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas MANBRO.BO's P/E ratio is 250.83. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to MANBRO.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to MANBRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check MANBRO.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while LIBERTSHOE.NS trades at ₹252.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas LIBERTSHOE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs LIBERTSHOE.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, LIBERTSHOE.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while LIBERTSHOE.BO trades at ₹251.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas LIBERTSHOE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to LIBERTSHOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check LIBERTSHOE.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs LEHAR.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, LEHAR.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while LEHAR.BO trades at ₹232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas LEHAR.BO's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to LEHAR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to LEHAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check LEHAR.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BCONCEPTS.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BCONCEPTS.NS trades at ₹269.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BCONCEPTS.NS's P/E ratio is 724.19. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BCONCEPTS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BCONCEPTS.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BCONCEPTS.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BCONCEPTS.BO trades at ₹271.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BCONCEPTS.BO's P/E ratio is 721.62. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BCONCEPTS.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BCONCEPTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BCONCEPTS.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs OMNITEX.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, OMNITEX.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while OMNITEX.BO trades at ₹615.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas OMNITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 5167.69. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to OMNITEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to OMNITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check OMNITEX.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs KHADIM.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, KHADIM.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while KHADIM.NS trades at ₹138.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas KHADIM.NS's P/E ratio is 34.20. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to KHADIM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to KHADIM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check KHADIM.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs KHADIM.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, KHADIM.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while KHADIM.BO trades at ₹138.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas KHADIM.BO's P/E ratio is 33.92. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to KHADIM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to KHADIM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check KHADIM.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs VIRAT.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, VIRAT.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while VIRAT.BO trades at ₹377.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas VIRAT.BO's P/E ratio is 118.01. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VIRAT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to VIRAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check VIRAT.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs VANDANA.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, VANDANA.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while VANDANA.BO trades at ₹18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas VANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is 1828.00. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VANDANA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to VANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check VANDANA.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SUPERHOUSE.BO trades at ₹161.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SUPERHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SUPERHOUSE.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SUPERHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SUPERHOUSE.NS trades at ₹163.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SUPERHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SUPERHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SUPERHOUSE.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs ACTIVE.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, ACTIVE.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while ACTIVE.BO trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas ACTIVE.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ACTIVE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACTIVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check ACTIVE.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs GARMNTMNTR.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, GARMNTMNTR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while GARMNTMNTR.BO trades at ₹1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas GARMNTMNTR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to GARMNTMNTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check GARMNTMNTR.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs CEENIK.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, CEENIK.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while CEENIK.BO trades at ₹300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas CEENIK.BO's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CEENIK.BO's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to CEENIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check CEENIK.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SCOOBEEDAY.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SCOOBEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SCOOBEEDAY.BO trades at ₹73.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SCOOBEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to SCOOBEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SCOOBEEDAY.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs CRAVATEX.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, CRAVATEX.BO has a market cap of 973.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while CRAVATEX.BO trades at ₹362.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas CRAVATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CRAVATEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to CRAVATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check CRAVATEX.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BANARBEADS.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.BO has a market cap of 839.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BANARBEADS.BO trades at ₹125.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BANARBEADS.BO's P/E ratio is 44.52. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BANARBEADS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to BANARBEADS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BANARBEADS.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BANARBEADS.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BANARBEADS.NS has a market cap of 829.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BANARBEADS.NS trades at ₹125.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BANARBEADS.NS's P/E ratio is 44.03. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BANARBEADS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to BANARBEADS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BANARBEADS.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs ELAND.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, ELAND.BO has a market cap of 767.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while ELAND.BO trades at ₹17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas ELAND.BO's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ELAND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to ELAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check ELAND.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs ACKNIT.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, ACKNIT.BO has a market cap of 763.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while ACKNIT.BO trades at ₹247.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas ACKNIT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to ACKNIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to ACKNIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check ACKNIT.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs AKI.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, AKI.BO has a market cap of 623.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while AKI.BO trades at ₹6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas AKI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AKI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to AKI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check AKI.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs JAIPURKURT.NS Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, JAIPURKURT.NS has a market cap of 603.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while JAIPURKURT.NS trades at ₹36.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas JAIPURKURT.NS's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to JAIPURKURT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to JAIPURKURT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check JAIPURKURT.NS's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SUNILTX.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SUNILTX.BO has a market cap of 315.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SUNILTX.BO trades at ₹75.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SUNILTX.BO's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SUNILTX.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SUNILTX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SUNILTX.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SCARNOSE.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SCARNOSE.BO has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SCARNOSE.BO trades at ₹76.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SCARNOSE.BO's P/E ratio is 104.11. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SCARNOSE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SCARNOSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SCARNOSE.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SPENTA.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SPENTA.BO has a market cap of 237.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SPENTA.BO trades at ₹85.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SPENTA.BO's P/E ratio is 44.05. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SPENTA.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to SPENTA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SPENTA.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs CITYMAN.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, CITYMAN.BO has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while CITYMAN.BO trades at ₹13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas CITYMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -49.42. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to CITYMAN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to CITYMAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check CITYMAN.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs VIVAA.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, VIVAA.BO has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while VIVAA.BO trades at ₹37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas VIVAA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to VIVAA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to VIVAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check VIVAA.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs NEWLIGHT.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, NEWLIGHT.BO has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while NEWLIGHT.BO trades at ₹1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas NEWLIGHT.BO's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NEWLIGHT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to NEWLIGHT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check NEWLIGHT.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs NBFOOT.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, NBFOOT.BO has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while NBFOOT.BO trades at ₹9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas NBFOOT.BO's P/E ratio is -50.59. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to NBFOOT.BO's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to NBFOOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check NBFOOT.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs BILLWIN.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, BILLWIN.BO has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while BILLWIN.BO trades at ₹24.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas BILLWIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to BILLWIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to BILLWIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check BILLWIN.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs WELTI.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, WELTI.BO has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while WELTI.BO trades at ₹23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas WELTI.BO's P/E ratio is -37.34. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to WELTI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to WELTI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check WELTI.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs EUROLED.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, EUROLED.BO has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while EUROLED.BO trades at ₹19.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas EUROLED.BO's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to EUROLED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to EUROLED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check EUROLED.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs KARANWO.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, KARANWO.BO has a market cap of 84.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while KARANWO.BO trades at ₹10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas KARANWO.BO's P/E ratio is -11.55. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to KARANWO.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to KARANWO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check KARANWO.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SIDDHEGA.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SIDDHEGA.BO has a market cap of 71.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SIDDHEGA.BO trades at ₹21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SIDDHEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 538.25. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SIDDHEGA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to SIDDHEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SIDDHEGA.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs SRIND.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, SRIND.BO has a market cap of 61.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while SRIND.BO trades at ₹3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas SRIND.BO's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to SRIND.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to SRIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check SRIND.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs RICHAIND.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, RICHAIND.BO has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while RICHAIND.BO trades at ₹1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas RICHAIND.BO's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to RICHAIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is less volatile compared to RICHAIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check RICHAIND.BO's competition here
VIPIND.NS vs AKM.BO Comparison February 2026
VIPIND.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VIPIND.NS stands at 52.9B. In comparison, AKM.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIPIND.NS is priced at ₹355.65, while AKM.BO trades at ₹122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VIPIND.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -26.97, whereas AKM.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIPIND.NS's ROE is -0.40%, compared to AKM.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, VIPIND.NS is more volatile compared to AKM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIPIND.NS.Check AKM.BO's competition here