Village Farms International, Inc.
Village Farms International, Inc. VFF Peers
See (VFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Farm Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFF | $1.24 | -1.59% | 139.3M | -3.54 | -$0.35 | N/A |
ADM | $46.98 | -0.55% | 22.6B | 16.54 | $2.84 | +4.30% |
TSN | $55.23 | -0.71% | 19.3B | 21.49 | $2.57 | +3.60% |
BG | $73.87 | -0.97% | 9.9B | 9.48 | $7.79 | +3.71% |
SFD | $22.90 | -1.67% | 9B | 10.09 | $2.27 | +2.16% |
CALM | $95.67 | +0.28% | 4.6B | 4.73 | $20.24 | +7.05% |
AGRO | $9.07 | -1.04% | 4.5B | 10.07 | $0.90 | +3.85% |
IBA | $53.00 | -1.82% | 2.6B | 7.77 | $6.82 | N/A |
FDP | $32.77 | -1.07% | 1.6B | 10.75 | $3.05 | +3.33% |
VITL | $30.52 | -0.55% | 1.4B | 27.25 | $1.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
VFF vs ADM Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while ADM trades at $46.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs TSN Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while TSN trades at $55.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs BG Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while BG trades at $73.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs SFD Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while SFD trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CALM Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CALM trades at $95.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AGRO Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AGRO trades at $9.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs IBA Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while IBA trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs FDP Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while FDP trades at $32.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs VITL Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while VITL trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 27.25. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs DOLE Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while DOLE trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs LND Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 385M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while LND trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CHSCP Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CHSCP trades at $27.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CHSCM Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 337.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CHSCM trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CHSCL Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 337.4M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CHSCL trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CHSCN Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CHSCN trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs CHSCO Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while CHSCO trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs LMNR Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 272.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while LMNR trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is 35.07. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs ALCO Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 238.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while ALCO trades at $31.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AFRI Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AFRI trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AGFS Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AGFS trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs PME Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while PME trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs LOCL Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while LOCL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs DTCK Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while DTCK trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs SANW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while SANW trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AFRIW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AFRIW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs APPH Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while APPH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs APPHW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while APPHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs SDOT Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while SDOT trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 0.96. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs EDBLW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while EDBLW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs EDBL Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while EDBL trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AGRI Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AGRI trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGRI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AQB Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AQB trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AQB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs KAL Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while KAL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs KALWW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while KALWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AAGR Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 578.7K. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AAGR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AAGRW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315.5K. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.
VFF vs AGRIW Comparison
VFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, VFF stands at 139.3M. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69.2K. Regarding current trading prices, VFF is priced at $1.24, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
VFF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.54, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, VFF's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, VFF is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VFF.