Meyka Pro banner
Forafric Global PLC

Forafric Global PLC (NASDAQ: AFRIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

See AFRIW's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.

AFRIWNASDAQ
Basic MaterialsAgricultural Inputs
$0.99
$0.15(18.15%)
U.S. Market is Open · 13:36

Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for AFRIW and its NASDAQ peers.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
AFRIW$0.92+10.02%265.1M-40.00-$0.02N/A
CTA-PA$53.61+1.34%59.8BN/AN/A+0.81%
CTVA$89.25+0.53%59.7B24.19$3.69+0.81%
CTA-PB$66.08+0.27%59.5BN/AN/A+0.81%
NTR$68.10-0.64%32.7B13.73$4.96+3.21%
CF$125.07-1.29%19.2B10.84$11.54+1.60%
MOS$22.30+0.09%7.1B12.26$1.82+3.93%
ICL$5.28-0.38%6.8B13.54$0.39+3.61%
SMG$69.31+2.64%4B15.79$4.39+3.81%
FMC$11.30-3.34%1.4B4.43$2.55+7.17%
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

EIDP, Inc. (NYSE: CTA-PA)

AFRIW vs CTA-PA Comparison July 2026

Forafric Global PLC (NASDAQ: AFRIW) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFRIW stands at 265.1M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFRIW is priced at $0.92 on the NASDAQ, while CTA-PA trades at $53.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFRIW currently has a P/E ratio of -40.00, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFRIW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFRIW is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFRIW.Check CTA-PA's competition here

Stock price comparison of stocks in the Basic Materials Sector

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions