UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JIOFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JIOFIN.NS trades at ₹205.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JIOFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 64.47. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JIOFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JIOFIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JIOFIN.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JIOFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JIOFIN.BO trades at ₹205.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JIOFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 64.47. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JIOFIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JIOFIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JIOFIN.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ICICIAMC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ICICIAMC.BO trades at ₹2,655.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ICICIAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICICIAMC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIAMC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIAMC.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ICICIAMC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ICICIAMC.NS trades at ₹2,651.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ICICIAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICICIAMC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIAMC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIAMC.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BAJAJHLDNG.BO trades at ₹11,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BAJAJHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BAJAJHLDNG.NS trades at ₹11,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BAJAJHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BAJAJHLDNG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BAJAJHLDNG.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GROWW.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GROWW.NS trades at ₹181.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GROWW.NS's P/E ratio is 46.46. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GROWW.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GROWW.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GROWW.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GROWW.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GROWW.BO trades at ₹181.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GROWW.BO's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GROWW.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GROWW.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GROWW.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.NS has a market cap of 965.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCAMC.NS trades at ₹2,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCAMC.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCAMC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCAMC.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SBIFUNDS.BO has a market cap of 944.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SBIFUNDS.BO trades at ₹463.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SBIFUNDS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBIFUNDS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to SBIFUNDS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SBIFUNDS.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SBIFUNDS.NS has a market cap of 943.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SBIFUNDS.NS trades at ₹463.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SBIFUNDS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBIFUNDS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to SBIFUNDS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SBIFUNDS.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, UTINIFTETF.BO has a market cap of 622.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while UTINIFTETF.BO trades at ₹288.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTINIFTETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTINIFTETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTINIFTETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTINIFTETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.NS has a market cap of 590.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NAM-INDIA.NS trades at ₹922.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NAM-INDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.86. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAM-INDIA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NAM-INDIA.BO has a market cap of 590.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NAM-INDIA.BO trades at ₹922.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NAM-INDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.95. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAM-INDIA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to NAM-INDIA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NAM-INDIA.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GOLDBEES.NS has a market cap of 562.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GOLDBEES.NS trades at ₹115.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GOLDBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOLDBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDBEES.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GOLDBEES.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCAMC.BO has a market cap of 481.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCAMC.BO trades at ₹2,250.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.61. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCAMC.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCAMC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCAMC.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.BO has a market cap of 478.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while UTISENSETF.BO trades at ₹942.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTISENSETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTISENSETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTISENSETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, UTISENSETF.NS has a market cap of 476.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while UTISENSETF.NS trades at ₹939.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTISENSETF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTISENSETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTISENSETF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTISENSETF.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, 360ONE.NS has a market cap of 406.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while 360ONE.NS trades at ₹997.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 360ONE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 360ONE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 360ONE.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, 360ONE.BO has a market cap of 405.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while 360ONE.BO trades at ₹997.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 360ONE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 360ONE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to 360ONE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 360ONE.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.NS has a market cap of 371.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ANANDRATHI.NS trades at ₹2,235.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ANANDRATHI.NS's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANANDRATHI.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ANANDRATHI.BO has a market cap of 370.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ANANDRATHI.BO trades at ₹2,221.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ANANDRATHI.BO's P/E ratio is 31.16. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANANDRATHI.BO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ANANDRATHI.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ANANDRATHI.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NUVAMA.NS has a market cap of 306.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NUVAMA.NS trades at ₹1,661.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NUVAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVAMA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NUVAMA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NUVAMA.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NUVAMA.BO has a market cap of 306.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NUVAMA.BO trades at ₹1,660.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NUVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NUVAMA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NUVAMA.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.NS has a market cap of 277.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TATAINVEST.NS trades at ₹548.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TATAINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 64.00. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATAINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TATAINVEST.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TATAINVEST.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.NS has a market cap of 257.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ABSLAMC.NS trades at ₹889.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ABSLAMC.NS's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABSLAMC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ABSLAMC.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ABSLAMC.BO has a market cap of 257.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ABSLAMC.BO trades at ₹893.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ABSLAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.44. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABSLAMC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to ABSLAMC.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ABSLAMC.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, CPSEETF.BO has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while CPSEETF.BO trades at ₹85.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CPSEETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPSEETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to CPSEETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check CPSEETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, CPSEETF.NS has a market cap of 183.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while CPSEETF.NS trades at ₹85.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CPSEETF.NS's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPSEETF.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to CPSEETF.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check CPSEETF.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, IDFC.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while IDFC.NS trades at ₹108.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas IDFC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDFC.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to IDFC.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check IDFC.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, IDFC.BO has a market cap of 172.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while IDFC.BO trades at ₹108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas IDFC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDFC.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to IDFC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check IDFC.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.NS has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MAHSCOOTER.NS trades at ₹11,862.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MAHSCOOTER.NS's P/E ratio is 48.67. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MAHSCOOTER.BO has a market cap of 135.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MAHSCOOTER.BO trades at ₹11,839.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MAHSCOOTER.BO's P/E ratio is 43.58. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MAHSCOOTER.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MAHSCOOTER.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, PRUDENT.NS has a market cap of 118.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while PRUDENT.NS trades at ₹2,797.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PRUDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 54.00. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRUDENT.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to PRUDENT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PRUDENT.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, PRUDENT.BO has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while PRUDENT.BO trades at ₹2,798.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PRUDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRUDENT.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to PRUDENT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PRUDENT.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, UTIAMC.BO has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while UTIAMC.BO trades at ₹816.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTIAMC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTIAMC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTIAMC.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTIAMC.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TSFINV.NS has a market cap of 84.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TSFINV.NS trades at ₹383.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TSFINV.NS's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TSFINV.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TSFINV.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TSFINV.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SHREMINVIT.NS has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SHREMINVIT.NS trades at ₹118.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SHREMINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREMINVIT.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is not fully comparable compared to SHREMINVIT.NS. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SHREMINVIT.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, CITIUSINVT.BO has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while CITIUSINVT.BO trades at ₹113.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas CITIUSINVT.BO's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CITIUSINVT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to CITIUSINVT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check CITIUSINVT.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, INDUSINVIT.BO has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while INDUSINVIT.BO trades at ₹124.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas INDUSINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDUSINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to INDUSINVIT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check INDUSINVIT.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BHINVIT.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BHINVIT.BO trades at ₹112.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BHINVIT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHINVIT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BHINVIT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BHINVIT.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.NS has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while PILANIINVS.NS trades at ₹3,789.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PILANIINVS.NS's P/E ratio is -353.25. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PILANIINVS.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to PILANIINVS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PILANIINVS.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, PILANIINVS.BO has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while PILANIINVS.BO trades at ₹3,779.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas PILANIINVS.BO's P/E ratio is 138.27. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PILANIINVS.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to PILANIINVS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check PILANIINVS.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MID150BEES.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MID150BEES.NS trades at ₹213.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MID150BEES.NS's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MID150BEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MID150BEES.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MID150BEES.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, 0P00017K5W.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while 0P00017K5W.BO trades at ₹41.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P00017K5W.BO's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0P00017K5W.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00017K5W.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 0P00017K5W.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, IRBINVIT.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while IRBINVIT.NS trades at ₹60.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas IRBINVIT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRBINVIT.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to IRBINVIT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check IRBINVIT.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BANKIETF.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BANKIETF.BO trades at ₹55.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BANKIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANKIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BANKIETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BANKIETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TATAINVEST.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TATAINVEST.BO trades at ₹548.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TATAINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TATAINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TATAINVEST.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TATAINVEST.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCSML250.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCSML250.BO trades at ₹164.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCSML250.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCSML250.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCSML250.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCSML250.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GOLDSHARE.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GOLDSHARE.NS trades at ₹114.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GOLDSHARE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOLDSHARE.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDSHARE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GOLDSHARE.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NSIL.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NSIL.NS trades at ₹4,851.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.98. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSIL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NSIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NSIL.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NSIL.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NSIL.BO trades at ₹4,882.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NSIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NSIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NSIL.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, UTINEXT50.BO has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while UTINEXT50.BO trades at ₹73.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas UTINEXT50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UTINEXT50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to UTINEXT50.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check UTINEXT50.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, LTGILTBEES.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while LTGILTBEES.NS trades at ₹29.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas LTGILTBEES.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LTGILTBEES.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to LTGILTBEES.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check LTGILTBEES.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MEDIASSIST.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MEDIASSIST.NS trades at ₹284.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MEDIASSIST.NS's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MEDIASSIST.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MEDIASSIST.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MEDIASSIST.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCNIFBAN.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCNIFBAN.BO trades at ₹55.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCNIFBAN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCNIFBAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCNIFBAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCNIFBAN.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, KICL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while KICL.NS trades at ₹4,414.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas KICL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.42. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KICL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to KICL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check KICL.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, KICL.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while KICL.BO trades at ₹4,410.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas KICL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.39. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KICL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to KICL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check KICL.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MIDCAPETF.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MIDCAPETF.BO trades at ₹21.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MIDCAPETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIDCAPETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MIDCAPETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MIDCAPETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GAJA.BO has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GAJA.BO trades at ₹116.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GAJA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GAJA.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to GAJA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GAJA.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BFINVEST.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BFINVEST.NS trades at ₹384.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BFINVEST.NS's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFINVEST.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BFINVEST.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BFINVEST.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MIIL.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MIIL.BO trades at ₹664.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 318.31. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to MIIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MIIL.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BFINVEST.BO has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BFINVEST.BO trades at ₹383.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BFINVEST.BO's P/E ratio is 3.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFINVEST.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BFINVEST.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BFINVEST.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, NEXT50.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while NEXT50.BO trades at ₹679.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas NEXT50.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEXT50.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to NEXT50.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check NEXT50.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JINDALPHOT.NS trades at ₹1,055.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JINDALPHOT.NS's P/E ratio is -17.44. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JINDALPHOT.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JINDALPHOT.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JINDALPHOT.BO trades at ₹1,052.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JINDALPHOT.BO's P/E ratio is -47.35. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JINDALPHOT.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JINDALPHOT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JINDALPHOT.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,329.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check VHL.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,347.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check VHL.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, INDPRUD.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while INDPRUD.BO trades at ₹6,022.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas INDPRUD.BO's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDPRUD.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to INDPRUD.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check INDPRUD.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JPOLYINVST.NS trades at ₹854.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JPOLYINVST.NS's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPOLYINVST.NS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, JPOLYINVST.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while JPOLYINVST.BO trades at ₹850.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas JPOLYINVST.BO's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JPOLYINVST.BO's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to JPOLYINVST.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check JPOLYINVST.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, STEL.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while STEL.NS trades at ₹479.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas STEL.NS's P/E ratio is 44.00. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STEL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to STEL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check STEL.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, STEL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while STEL.BO trades at ₹476.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas STEL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STEL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to STEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check STEL.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GFLLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GFLLIMITED.NS trades at ₹53.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GFLLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is similarly volatile compared to GFLLIMITED.NS. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GFLLIMITED.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BINDALAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BINDALAGRO.NS trades at ₹22.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BINDALAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BINDALAGRO.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BINDALAGRO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BINDALAGRO.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, GFLLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while GFLLIMITED.BO trades at ₹53.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas GFLLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFLLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to GFLLIMITED.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check GFLLIMITED.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HERCULES.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HERCULES.NS trades at ₹159.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HERCULES.NS's P/E ratio is 65.30. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HERCULES.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HERCULES.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HERCULES.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCSENSEX.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCSENSEX.BO trades at ₹82.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCSENSEX.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCSENSEX.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCSENSEX.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCSENSEX.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCPVTBAN.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCPVTBAN.BO trades at ₹27.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCPVTBAN.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCPVTBAN.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCPVTBAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCPVTBAN.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MAHKTECH.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MAHKTECH.BO trades at ₹20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MAHKTECH.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAHKTECH.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to MAHKTECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MAHKTECH.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SILINV.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SILINV.NS trades at ₹429.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SILINV.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SILINV.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SILINV.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SILINV.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while OSWALGREEN.BO trades at ₹17.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas OSWALGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSWALGREEN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, OSWALGREEN.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while OSWALGREEN.NS trades at ₹17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas OSWALGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is -7.21. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OSWALGREEN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to OSWALGREEN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check OSWALGREEN.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SILINV.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SILINV.BO trades at ₹418.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SILINV.BO's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SILINV.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to SILINV.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SILINV.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, SRAMSET.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while SRAMSET.BO trades at ₹247.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas SRAMSET.BO's P/E ratio is -17.21. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRAMSET.BO's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to SRAMSET.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check SRAMSET.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MIDCAPIETF.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MIDCAPIETF.BO trades at ₹21.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MIDCAPIETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MIDCAPIETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MIDCAPIETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ALPHAETF.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ALPHAETF.BO trades at ₹23.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ALPHAETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALPHAETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ALPHAETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ALPHAETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HERCULES.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HERCULES.BO trades at ₹106.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HERCULES.BO's P/E ratio is 44.36. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HERCULES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HERCULES.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HERCULES.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, BANKETF.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while BANKETF.BO trades at ₹552.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas BANKETF.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BANKETF.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to BANKETF.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check BANKETF.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, 0P00005WLX.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while 0P00005WLX.BO trades at ₹222.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas 0P00005WLX.BO's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to 0P00005WLX.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to 0P00005WLX.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check 0P00005WLX.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.NS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TIMESGTY.NS trades at ₹286.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TIMESGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 110.08. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMESGTY.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TIMESGTY.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TIMESGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TIMESGTY.BO trades at ₹283.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TIMESGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 109.56. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMESGTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to TIMESGTY.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TIMESGTY.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, MAKEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while MAKEINDIA.BO trades at ₹147.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas MAKEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAKEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to MAKEINDIA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check MAKEINDIA.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ICICIB22.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ICICIB22.NS trades at ₹105.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ICICIB22.NS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICICIB22.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIB22.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIB22.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, ICICIB22.BO has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while ICICIB22.BO trades at ₹105.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas ICICIB22.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ICICIB22.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to ICICIB22.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check ICICIB22.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TEAMGTY.BO trades at ₹229.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TEAMGTY.BO's P/E ratio is 182.14. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEAMGTY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TEAMGTY.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, TEAMGTY.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while TEAMGTY.NS trades at ₹227.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas TEAMGTY.NS's P/E ratio is 180.71. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEAMGTY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to TEAMGTY.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check TEAMGTY.NS's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, HDFCBSE500.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while HDFCBSE500.BO trades at ₹34.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas HDFCBSE500.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HDFCBSE500.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is more volatile compared to HDFCBSE500.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check HDFCBSE500.BO's competition here

UTI Asset Management Company Limited (NSE: UTIAMC.NS) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, UTIAMC.NS stands at 105B. In comparison, VAARAD.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UTIAMC.NS is priced at ₹817.05 on the NSE, while VAARAD.BO trades at ₹7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

UTIAMC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.37, whereas VAARAD.BO's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, UTIAMC.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VAARAD.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UTIAMC.NS is less volatile compared to VAARAD.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UTIAMC.NS.Check VAARAD.BO's competition here