GFL Limited (GFLLIMITED.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFLLIMITED.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFLLIMITED.NS | ₹45.63 | -0.78% | 5B | 18.89 | ₹2.42 | N/A |
| PVR.NS | ₹1,454.05 | +0.00% | 142.4B | -83.09 | -₹17.50 | N/A |
| PVRINOX.NS | ₹1,001.25 | +1.61% | 98.3B | 60.83 | ₹16.46 | N/A |
| PVRINOX.BO | ₹999.20 | +1.47% | 98.2B | 60.66 | ₹16.47 | N/A |
| SAREGAMA.BO | ₹485.65 | -1.64% | 93.5B | 45.30 | ₹10.72 | +0.93% |
| TIPSINDLTD.BO | ₹685.00 | -2.18% | 87.6B | 57.85 | ₹11.84 | N/A |
| TIPSMUSIC.NS | ₹684.65 | +1.12% | 87.5B | 51.21 | ₹13.37 | +1.90% |
| TIPSINDLTD.NS | ₹680.25 | -0.58% | 87B | 60.85 | ₹11.18 | N/A |
| PFOCUS.BO | ₹234.40 | -3.62% | 83.4B | 54.81 | ₹4.28 | N/A |
| INOXLEISUR.NS | ₹507.10 | -0.34% | 62B | -120.17 | -₹4.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PVR.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PVR.NS has a market cap of 142.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PVR.NS trades at ₹1,454.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PVR.NS's P/E ratio is -83.09. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PVR.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to PVR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PVR.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PVRINOX.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PVRINOX.NS has a market cap of 98.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PVRINOX.NS trades at ₹1,001.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PVRINOX.NS's P/E ratio is 60.83. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PVRINOX.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to PVRINOX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PVRINOX.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PVRINOX.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PVRINOX.BO has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PVRINOX.BO trades at ₹999.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PVRINOX.BO's P/E ratio is 60.66. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PVRINOX.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to PVRINOX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PVRINOX.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SAREGAMA.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SAREGAMA.BO has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SAREGAMA.BO trades at ₹485.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SAREGAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.30. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAREGAMA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to SAREGAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SAREGAMA.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs TIPSINDLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, TIPSINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while TIPSINDLTD.BO trades at ₹685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas TIPSINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 57.85. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIPSINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to TIPSINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check TIPSINDLTD.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs TIPSMUSIC.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, TIPSMUSIC.NS has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while TIPSMUSIC.NS trades at ₹684.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas TIPSMUSIC.NS's P/E ratio is 51.21. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIPSMUSIC.NS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to TIPSMUSIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check TIPSMUSIC.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs TIPSINDLTD.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, TIPSINDLTD.NS has a market cap of 87B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while TIPSINDLTD.NS trades at ₹680.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas TIPSINDLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 60.85. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIPSINDLTD.NS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to TIPSINDLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check TIPSINDLTD.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PFOCUS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PFOCUS.BO has a market cap of 83.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PFOCUS.BO trades at ₹234.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PFOCUS.BO's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFOCUS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to PFOCUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PFOCUS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs INOXLEISUR.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, INOXLEISUR.NS has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while INOXLEISUR.NS trades at ₹507.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas INOXLEISUR.NS's P/E ratio is -120.17. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INOXLEISUR.NS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to INOXLEISUR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check INOXLEISUR.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs COLAB.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, COLAB.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while COLAB.BO trades at ₹146.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas COLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 664.32. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COLAB.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to COLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check COLAB.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs IMAGICAA.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, IMAGICAA.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while IMAGICAA.BO trades at ₹47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas IMAGICAA.BO's P/E ratio is 430093764413881088.00. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IMAGICAA.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to IMAGICAA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check IMAGICAA.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs HATHWAY.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, HATHWAY.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while HATHWAY.BO trades at ₹11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas HATHWAY.BO's P/E ratio is 24.42. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HATHWAY.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to HATHWAY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check HATHWAY.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs HATHWAY.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, HATHWAY.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while HATHWAY.NS trades at ₹11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas HATHWAY.NS's P/E ratio is 24.40. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HATHWAY.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to HATHWAY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check HATHWAY.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs DEN.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, DEN.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while DEN.BO trades at ₹29.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas DEN.BO's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to DEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check DEN.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs DEN.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, DEN.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while DEN.NS trades at ₹29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas DEN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DEN.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to DEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check DEN.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs BALAJITELE.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, BALAJITELE.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while BALAJITELE.BO trades at ₹91.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas BALAJITELE.BO's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALAJITELE.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to BALAJITELE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check BALAJITELE.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs BALAJITELE.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, BALAJITELE.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while BALAJITELE.NS trades at ₹91.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas BALAJITELE.NS's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BALAJITELE.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to BALAJITELE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check BALAJITELE.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs GTPL.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, GTPL.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while GTPL.BO trades at ₹61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas GTPL.BO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to GTPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check GTPL.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs GTPL.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, GTPL.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while GTPL.NS trades at ₹61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas GTPL.NS's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTPL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to GTPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check GTPL.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs DISHTV.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, DISHTV.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while DISHTV.BO trades at ₹3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas DISHTV.BO's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DISHTV.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to DISHTV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check DISHTV.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs DISHTV.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, DISHTV.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while DISHTV.NS trades at ₹3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas DISHTV.NS's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DISHTV.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to DISHTV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check DISHTV.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs MADHUVEER.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, MADHUVEER.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while MADHUVEER.BO trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas MADHUVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 147.95. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MADHUVEER.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to MADHUVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check MADHUVEER.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs GFLLIMITED.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, GFLLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while GFLLIMITED.BO trades at ₹45.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas GFLLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GFLLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to GFLLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check GFLLIMITED.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs NDLVENTURE.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, NDLVENTURE.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while NDLVENTURE.BO trades at ₹133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas NDLVENTURE.BO's P/E ratio is 485.05. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDLVENTURE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to NDLVENTURE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check NDLVENTURE.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs NDLVENTURE.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, NDLVENTURE.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while NDLVENTURE.NS trades at ₹133.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas NDLVENTURE.NS's P/E ratio is 493.96. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDLVENTURE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to NDLVENTURE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check NDLVENTURE.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs POOJAENT.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, POOJAENT.BO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while POOJAENT.BO trades at ₹79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas POOJAENT.BO's P/E ratio is 420.89. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POOJAENT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to POOJAENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check POOJAENT.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs NXTDIGITAL.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, NXTDIGITAL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while NXTDIGITAL.NS trades at ₹117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas NXTDIGITAL.NS's P/E ratio is -21.27. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NXTDIGITAL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to NXTDIGITAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check NXTDIGITAL.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SHEMAROO.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SHEMAROO.NS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SHEMAROO.NS trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SHEMAROO.NS's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHEMAROO.NS's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to SHEMAROO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SHEMAROO.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SHEMAROO.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SHEMAROO.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SHEMAROO.BO trades at ₹124.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SHEMAROO.BO's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHEMAROO.BO's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to SHEMAROO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SHEMAROO.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs UFO.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, UFO.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while UFO.NS trades at ₹72.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas UFO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UFO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to UFO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check UFO.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs UFO.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, UFO.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while UFO.BO trades at ₹72.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas UFO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UFO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to UFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check UFO.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs TIPSFILMS.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, TIPSFILMS.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while TIPSFILMS.NS trades at ₹329.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas TIPSFILMS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.49. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIPSFILMS.NS's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to TIPSFILMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check TIPSFILMS.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs TIPSFILMS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, TIPSFILMS.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while TIPSFILMS.BO trades at ₹328.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas TIPSFILMS.BO's P/E ratio is -232.91. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TIPSFILMS.BO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to TIPSFILMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check TIPSFILMS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs MUKTAARTS.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, MUKTAARTS.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while MUKTAARTS.NS trades at ₹55.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas MUKTAARTS.NS's P/E ratio is -13.01. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUKTAARTS.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to MUKTAARTS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check MUKTAARTS.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs MUKTAARTS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, MUKTAARTS.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while MUKTAARTS.BO trades at ₹56.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas MUKTAARTS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MUKTAARTS.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to MUKTAARTS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check MUKTAARTS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs BTML.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, BTML.NS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while BTML.NS trades at ₹6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas BTML.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BTML.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to BTML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check BTML.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs CINEVISTA.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, CINEVISTA.NS has a market cap of 946M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while CINEVISTA.NS trades at ₹16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas CINEVISTA.NS's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CINEVISTA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to CINEVISTA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check CINEVISTA.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs BABA.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, BABA.BO has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while BABA.BO trades at ₹15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas BABA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.83. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BABA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to BABA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check BABA.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs EROSMEDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, EROSMEDIA.BO has a market cap of 756.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while EROSMEDIA.BO trades at ₹7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas EROSMEDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EROSMEDIA.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to EROSMEDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check EROSMEDIA.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs EROSMEDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, EROSMEDIA.NS has a market cap of 749.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while EROSMEDIA.NS trades at ₹7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas EROSMEDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EROSMEDIA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to EROSMEDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check EROSMEDIA.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs GVFILM.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, GVFILM.BO has a market cap of 540.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while GVFILM.BO trades at ₹0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas GVFILM.BO's P/E ratio is -39.35. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GVFILM.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to GVFILM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check GVFILM.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PICTUREHS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PICTUREHS.BO has a market cap of 411.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PICTUREHS.BO trades at ₹7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PICTUREHS.BO's P/E ratio is -119.27. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PICTUREHS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to PICTUREHS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PICTUREHS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs KSERASERA.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, KSERASERA.NS has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while KSERASERA.NS trades at ₹0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas KSERASERA.NS's P/E ratio is -12.16. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KSERASERA.NS's ROE of -1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to KSERASERA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check KSERASERA.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PNC.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PNC.BO has a market cap of 311.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PNC.BO trades at ₹21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PNC.BO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PNC.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to PNC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PNC.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SITINET.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SITINET.BO has a market cap of 296.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SITINET.BO trades at ₹0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SITINET.BO's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SITINET.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to SITINET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SITINET.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SITINET.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SITINET.NS has a market cap of 287.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SITINET.NS trades at ₹0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SITINET.NS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SITINET.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to SITINET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SITINET.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SHALPRO.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SHALPRO.BO has a market cap of 236.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SHALPRO.BO trades at ₹0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SHALPRO.BO's P/E ratio is -99.59. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHALPRO.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to SHALPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SHALPRO.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SAGARPROD.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SAGARPROD.BO has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SAGARPROD.BO trades at ₹5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SAGARPROD.BO's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SAGARPROD.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to SAGARPROD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SAGARPROD.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs MEDIAONE.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, MEDIAONE.BO has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while MEDIAONE.BO trades at ₹15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas MEDIAONE.BO's P/E ratio is 117.87. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEDIAONE.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to MEDIAONE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check MEDIAONE.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs COLORCHIPS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, COLORCHIPS.BO has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while COLORCHIPS.BO trades at ₹12.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas COLORCHIPS.BO's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COLORCHIPS.BO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to COLORCHIPS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check COLORCHIPS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs SILLYMONKS.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, SILLYMONKS.NS has a market cap of 165.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while SILLYMONKS.NS trades at ₹16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas SILLYMONKS.NS's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SILLYMONKS.NS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to SILLYMONKS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check SILLYMONKS.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs VRFILMS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, VRFILMS.BO has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while VRFILMS.BO trades at ₹14.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas VRFILMS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VRFILMS.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to VRFILMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check VRFILMS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs RADAAN.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, RADAAN.NS has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while RADAAN.NS trades at ₹2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas RADAAN.NS's P/E ratio is -10.49. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RADAAN.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to RADAAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check RADAAN.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs RADAAN.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, RADAAN.BO has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while RADAAN.BO trades at ₹2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas RADAAN.BO's P/E ratio is -14.56. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RADAAN.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to RADAAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check RADAAN.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs CREATIVEYE.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, CREATIVEYE.NS has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while CREATIVEYE.NS trades at ₹6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas CREATIVEYE.NS's P/E ratio is -6.85. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREATIVEYE.NS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to CREATIVEYE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check CREATIVEYE.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs CREATIVEYE.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, CREATIVEYE.BO has a market cap of 126.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while CREATIVEYE.BO trades at ₹6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas CREATIVEYE.BO's P/E ratio is -19.48. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CREATIVEYE.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to CREATIVEYE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check CREATIVEYE.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs BGIL.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, BGIL.BO has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while BGIL.BO trades at ₹9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas BGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 114.00. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGIL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to BGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check BGIL.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs DQE.NS Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, DQE.NS has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while DQE.NS trades at ₹0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas DQE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DQE.NS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to DQE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check DQE.NS's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PADMALAYAT.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PADMALAYAT.BO has a market cap of 69.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PADMALAYAT.BO trades at ₹4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PADMALAYAT.BO's P/E ratio is -1336.60. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PADMALAYAT.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to PADMALAYAT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PADMALAYAT.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs PURPLE.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, PURPLE.BO has a market cap of 53.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while PURPLE.BO trades at ₹6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas PURPLE.BO's P/E ratio is 32.63. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PURPLE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to PURPLE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check PURPLE.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs UNIVARTS.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, UNIVARTS.BO has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while UNIVARTS.BO trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas UNIVARTS.BO's P/E ratio is 51.00. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNIVARTS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is more volatile compared to UNIVARTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check UNIVARTS.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs VISIONCO.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, VISIONCO.BO has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while VISIONCO.BO trades at ₹2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas VISIONCO.BO's P/E ratio is -25.88. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VISIONCO.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to VISIONCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check VISIONCO.BO's competition here
GFLLIMITED.NS vs GFIL.BO Comparison July 2026
GFLLIMITED.NS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFLLIMITED.NS stands at 5B. In comparison, GFIL.BO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GFLLIMITED.NS is priced at ₹45.63, while GFIL.BO trades at ₹28.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFLLIMITED.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 18.89, whereas GFIL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFLLIMITED.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GFIL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFLLIMITED.NS is less volatile compared to GFIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFLLIMITED.NS.Check GFIL.BO's competition here