Usha Martin Education & Solutions Limited
Usha Martin Education & Solutions Limited (UMESLTD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UMESLTD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMESLTD.NS | ₹6.20 | +0.00% | 172M | 50.08 | ₹0.13 | N/A |
| NIITMTS.NS | ₹286.35 | +0.00% | 41B | 19.15 | ₹15.61 | +1.00% |
| NIITMTS.BO | ₹285.60 | +0.00% | 40.9B | 19.11 | ₹15.62 | +1.00% |
| CRIZAC.NS | ₹205.50 | +0.02% | 35.4B | 18.46 | ₹10.97 | N/A |
| CRIZAC.BO | ₹205.50 | +0.00% | 35.4B | 18.42 | ₹10.97 | N/A |
| VERANDA.BO | ₹130.85 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 14.24 | ₹9.66 | N/A |
| VERANDA.NS | ₹131.74 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 14.25 | ₹9.65 | N/A |
| NIITLTD.BO | ₹62.41 | +0.00% | 8.2B | 35.90 | ₹1.67 | +1.67% |
| NIITLTD.NS | ₹62.39 | +0.00% | 8.1B | 35.75 | ₹1.67 | +1.67% |
| GLOBAL.NS | ₹99.55 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 22.40 | ₹4.43 | +1.01% |
Stock Comparison
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITMTS.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, NIITMTS.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while NIITMTS.NS trades at ₹286.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas NIITMTS.NS's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITMTS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITMTS.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITMTS.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, NIITMTS.BO has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while NIITMTS.BO trades at ₹285.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas NIITMTS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITMTS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITMTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITMTS.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CRIZAC.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, CRIZAC.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while CRIZAC.NS trades at ₹205.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas CRIZAC.NS's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRIZAC.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CRIZAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CRIZAC.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CRIZAC.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, CRIZAC.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while CRIZAC.BO trades at ₹205.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas CRIZAC.BO's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRIZAC.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CRIZAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CRIZAC.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs VERANDA.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, VERANDA.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while VERANDA.BO trades at ₹130.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas VERANDA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERANDA.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to VERANDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check VERANDA.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs VERANDA.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, VERANDA.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while VERANDA.NS trades at ₹131.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas VERANDA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VERANDA.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to VERANDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check VERANDA.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, NIITLTD.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while NIITLTD.BO trades at ₹62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas NIITLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITLTD.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs NIITLTD.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, NIITLTD.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while NIITLTD.NS trades at ₹62.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas NIITLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIITLTD.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to NIITLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check NIITLTD.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GLOBAL.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, GLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while GLOBAL.NS trades at ₹99.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas GLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GLOBAL.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs APTECHT.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, APTECHT.NS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while APTECHT.NS trades at ₹77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas APTECHT.NS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTECHT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to APTECHT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check APTECHT.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs APTECHT.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, APTECHT.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while APTECHT.BO trades at ₹78.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas APTECHT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APTECHT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to APTECHT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check APTECHT.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CLEDUCATE.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while CLEDUCATE.BO trades at ₹46.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas CLEDUCATE.BO's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLEDUCATE.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs CLEDUCATE.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, CLEDUCATE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while CLEDUCATE.NS trades at ₹45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas CLEDUCATE.NS's P/E ratio is -11.43. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLEDUCATE.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CLEDUCATE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check CLEDUCATE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GOLDENCREST.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, GOLDENCREST.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while GOLDENCREST.BO trades at ₹334.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas GOLDENCREST.BO's P/E ratio is 2523.08. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOLDENCREST.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDENCREST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GOLDENCREST.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs ZEELEARN.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while ZEELEARN.BO trades at ₹5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas ZEELEARN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEELEARN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ZEELEARN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check ZEELEARN.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs ZEELEARN.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, ZEELEARN.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while ZEELEARN.NS trades at ₹5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas ZEELEARN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEELEARN.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ZEELEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check ZEELEARN.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs COMPUSOFT.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.BO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while COMPUSOFT.BO trades at ₹13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas COMPUSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COMPUSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs COMPUSOFT.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, COMPUSOFT.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while COMPUSOFT.NS trades at ₹13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas COMPUSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 38.26. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COMPUSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to COMPUSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check COMPUSOFT.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEERTI.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, KEERTI.NS has a market cap of 733.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while KEERTI.NS trades at ₹71.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas KEERTI.NS's P/E ratio is 55.35. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEERTI.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KEERTI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEERTI.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.BO has a market cap of 659.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while LCCINFOTEC.BO trades at ₹5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas LCCINFOTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -40.08. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs LCCINFOTEC.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, LCCINFOTEC.NS has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while LCCINFOTEC.NS trades at ₹4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas LCCINFOTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -46.60. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to LCCINFOTEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check LCCINFOTEC.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs TREEHOUSE.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.NS has a market cap of 377M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while TREEHOUSE.NS trades at ₹8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas TREEHOUSE.NS's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREEHOUSE.NS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs TREEHOUSE.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, TREEHOUSE.BO has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while TREEHOUSE.BO trades at ₹8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas TREEHOUSE.BO's P/E ratio is -2.25. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TREEHOUSE.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TREEHOUSE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check TREEHOUSE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEEPLEARN.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.BO has a market cap of 300.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while KEEPLEARN.BO trades at ₹1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas KEEPLEARN.BO's P/E ratio is -193.00. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEEPLEARN.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs KEEPLEARN.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, KEEPLEARN.NS has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while KEEPLEARN.NS trades at ₹1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas KEEPLEARN.NS's P/E ratio is -182.00. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KEEPLEARN.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KEEPLEARN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check KEEPLEARN.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs GTECJAINX.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, GTECJAINX.NS has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while GTECJAINX.NS trades at ₹20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas GTECJAINX.NS's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GTECJAINX.NS's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to GTECJAINX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check GTECJAINX.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs UMESLTD.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, UMESLTD.BO has a market cap of 173.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while UMESLTD.BO trades at ₹6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas UMESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UMESLTD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to UMESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check UMESLTD.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs EDUCOMP.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.BO has a market cap of 127.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while EDUCOMP.BO trades at ₹1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas EDUCOMP.BO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EDUCOMP.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to EDUCOMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check EDUCOMP.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs EDUCOMP.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, EDUCOMP.NS has a market cap of 122.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while EDUCOMP.NS trades at ₹1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas EDUCOMP.NS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EDUCOMP.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EDUCOMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check EDUCOMP.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs MTEDUCARE.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.NS has a market cap of 93.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while MTEDUCARE.NS trades at ₹1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas MTEDUCARE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTEDUCARE.NS's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.NS's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs MTEDUCARE.BO Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, MTEDUCARE.BO has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while MTEDUCARE.BO trades at ₹1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas MTEDUCARE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTEDUCARE.BO's ROE of -9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MTEDUCARE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check MTEDUCARE.BO's competition here
UMESLTD.NS vs DALALSTCOM.NS Comparison March 2026
UMESLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UMESLTD.NS stands at 172M. In comparison, DALALSTCOM.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UMESLTD.NS is priced at ₹6.20, while DALALSTCOM.NS trades at ₹1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UMESLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 50.08, whereas DALALSTCOM.NS's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, UMESLTD.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DALALSTCOM.NS's ROE of +529.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UMESLTD.NS is more volatile compared to DALALSTCOM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UMESLTD.NS.Check DALALSTCOM.NS's competition here