Universal Health Services, Inc.
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UHS | $157.35 | -3.14% | 9.9B | 6.59 | $23.95 | +0.51% |
| HCA | $390.83 | -0.44% | 87.4B | 13.57 | $29.04 | +0.75% |
| THC | $173.60 | -2.47% | 15B | 9.03 | $19.24 | N/A |
| SOLV | $75.55 | -1.56% | 13.3B | 9.40 | $8.17 | N/A |
| DVA | $198.64 | -0.01% | 12.7B | 19.13 | $10.38 | N/A |
| FMS | $21.70 | +0.33% | 11.7B | 11.39 | $1.90 | +4.03% |
| EHC | $104.00 | -0.43% | 10.4B | 17.97 | $5.84 | +0.71% |
| ENSG | $169.74 | -1.13% | 10B | 28.00 | $6.14 | +0.15% |
| OSH | $39.00 | +0.08% | 9.5B | -17.65 | -$2.21 | N/A |
| CHE | $433.49 | -1.83% | 5.8B | 23.98 | $18.32 | +0.52% |
Stock Comparison
UHS vs HCA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HCA has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while HCA trades at $390.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas HCA's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCA's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to HCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check HCA's competition here
UHS vs THC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, THC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while THC trades at $173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas THC's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to THC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to THC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check THC's competition here
UHS vs SOLV Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SOLV has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SOLV trades at $75.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SOLV's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOLV's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to SOLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SOLV's competition here
UHS vs DVA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DVA has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while DVA trades at $198.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas DVA's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to DVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check DVA's competition here
UHS vs FMS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FMS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while FMS trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas FMS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to FMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check FMS's competition here
UHS vs EHC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EHC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while EHC trades at $104.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas EHC's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EHC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to EHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check EHC's competition here
UHS vs ENSG Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ENSG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ENSG trades at $169.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ENSG's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to ENSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ENSG's competition here
UHS vs OSH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OSH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while OSH trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas OSH's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSH's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to OSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check OSH's competition here
UHS vs CHE Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CHE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CHE trades at $433.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CHE's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to CHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CHE's competition here
UHS vs LHCG Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LHCG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while LHCG trades at $169.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas LHCG's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LHCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to LHCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check LHCG's competition here
UHS vs MMED Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while MMED trades at $11.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas MMED's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MMED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to MMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check MMED's competition here
UHS vs AMED Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AMED trades at $100.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AMED's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to AMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AMED's competition here
UHS vs OPCH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, OPCH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while OPCH trades at $20.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas OPCH's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OPCH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to OPCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check OPCH's competition here
UHS vs BKD Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BKD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while BKD trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas BKD's P/E ratio is -15.29. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKD's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to BKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check BKD's competition here
UHS vs NHC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NHC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NHC trades at $183.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NHC's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to NHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NHC's competition here
UHS vs LFST Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LFST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while LFST trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas LFST's P/E ratio is 123.17. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LFST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to LFST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check LFST's competition here
UHS vs ACHC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ACHC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ACHC trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ACHC's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to ACHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ACHC's competition here
UHS vs SEM Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SEM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SEM trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SEM's P/E ratio is 15.44. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to SEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SEM's competition here
UHS vs ASTH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ASTH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ASTH trades at $38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ASTH's P/E ratio is 62.05. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to ASTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ASTH's competition here
UHS vs AMEH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AMEH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AMEH trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AMEH's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMEH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AMEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AMEH's competition here
UHS vs SGRY Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SGRY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SGRY trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SGRY's P/E ratio is -22.71. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGRY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to SGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SGRY's competition here
UHS vs MD Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while MD trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas MD's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to MD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check MD's competition here
UHS vs ADUS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ADUS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ADUS trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ADUS's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADUS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to ADUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ADUS's competition here
UHS vs AVAH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AVAH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AVAH trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AVAH's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AVAH's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AVAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AVAH's competition here
UHS vs AGL Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AGL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AGL trades at $84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AGL's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AGL's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AGL's competition here
UHS vs HCSG Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HCSG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while HCSG trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas HCSG's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HCSG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to HCSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check HCSG's competition here
UHS vs ARDT Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ARDT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ARDT trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ARDT's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARDT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to ARDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ARDT's competition here
UHS vs BKDT Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BKDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while BKDT trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas BKDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKDT's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to BKDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check BKDT's competition here
UHS vs PNTG Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PNTG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while PNTG trades at $33.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas PNTG's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PNTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to PNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check PNTG's competition here
UHS vs CMPS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CMPS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CMPS trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CMPS's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMPS's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CMPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CMPS's competition here
UHS vs AMN Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AMN trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AMN's P/E ratio is -32.16. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AMN's competition here
UHS vs INNV Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, INNV has a market cap of 977.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while INNV trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas INNV's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INNV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to INNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check INNV's competition here
UHS vs USPH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, USPH has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while USPH trades at $62.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas USPH's P/E ratio is 123.92. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to USPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check USPH's competition here
UHS vs TALK Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TALK has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TALK trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TALK's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TALK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to TALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TALK's competition here
UHS vs FSHCX Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FSHCX has a market cap of 820.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while FSHCX trades at $107.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas FSHCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to FSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check FSHCX's competition here
UHS vs SNDA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SNDA has a market cap of 740.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SNDA trades at $37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SNDA's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SNDA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to SNDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SNDA's competition here
UHS vs EHAB Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EHAB has a market cap of 706.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while EHAB trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas EHAB's P/E ratio is -197.14. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EHAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to EHAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check EHAB's competition here
UHS vs GMRS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GMRS has a market cap of 501.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while GMRS trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas GMRS's P/E ratio is 68.81. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GMRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to GMRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check GMRS's competition here
UHS vs TOI Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOI has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TOI trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TOI's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOI's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to TOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TOI's competition here
UHS vs MCTA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MCTA has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while MCTA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas MCTA's P/E ratio is 419.36. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MCTA's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to MCTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check MCTA's competition here
UHS vs CCRN Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CCRN has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CCRN trades at $13.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CCRN's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCRN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to CCRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CCRN's competition here
UHS vs CYH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CYH has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CYH trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CYH's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to CYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CYH's competition here
UHS vs AIRS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AIRS has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AIRS trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AIRS's P/E ratio is -31.35. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AIRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AIRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AIRS's competition here
UHS vs AONC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AONC has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AONC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AONC's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AONC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to AONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AONC's competition here
UHS vs AUNA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AUNA has a market cap of 319M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AUNA trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AUNA's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AUNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AUNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AUNA's competition here
UHS vs CSU Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CSU has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CSU trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CSU's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CSU's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CSU's competition here
UHS vs JYNT Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, JYNT has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while JYNT trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas JYNT's P/E ratio is 99.44. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JYNT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to JYNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check JYNT's competition here
UHS vs NAKAW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NAKAW has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NAKAW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NAKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAKAW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to NAKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NAKAW's competition here
UHS vs FVE Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while FVE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas FVE's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to FVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check FVE's competition here
UHS vs KDLYW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KDLYW has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while KDLYW trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas KDLYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KDLYW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to KDLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check KDLYW's competition here
UHS vs BTMD Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BTMD has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while BTMD trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas BTMD's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BTMD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to BTMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check BTMD's competition here
UHS vs DCGO Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DCGO has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while DCGO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas DCGO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCGO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to DCGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check DCGO's competition here
UHS vs ALR Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ALR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ALR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ALR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to ALR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ALR's competition here
UHS vs PIII Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PIII has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while PIII trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas PIII's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIII's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to PIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check PIII's competition here
UHS vs IMAC Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IMAC has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while IMAC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas IMAC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMAC's ROE of +1183.61%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to IMAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check IMAC's competition here
UHS vs CCEL Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CCEL has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CCEL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CCEL's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CCEL's competition here
UHS vs CANO-WT Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CANO-WT has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CANO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CANO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CANO-WT's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CANO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CANO-WT's competition here
UHS vs AIH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AIH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AIH's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AIH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AIH's competition here
UHS vs CANO Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CANO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CANO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CANO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CANO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CANO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CANO's competition here
UHS vs FTRP Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, FTRP has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while FTRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas FTRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTRP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to FTRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check FTRP's competition here
UHS vs AMS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AMS has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AMS trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AMS's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AMS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AMS's competition here
UHS vs MODV Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MODV has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while MODV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas MODV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MODV's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to MODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check MODV's competition here
UHS vs SYRA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SYRA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SYRA trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SYRA's P/E ratio is -24.65. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SYRA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to SYRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SYRA's competition here
UHS vs GBNH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, GBNH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while GBNH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas GBNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBNH's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to GBNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check GBNH's competition here
UHS vs RHE Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RHE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while RHE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas RHE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RHE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to RHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check RHE's competition here
UHS vs RHE-PA Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, RHE-PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while RHE-PA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas RHE-PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RHE-PA's ROE of +2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to RHE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check RHE-PA's competition here
UHS vs TOIIW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TOIIW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TOIIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TOIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOIIW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to TOIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TOIIW's competition here
UHS vs ATIP Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ATIP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ATIP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ATIP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATIP's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to ATIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ATIP's competition here
UHS vs IMACW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IMACW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while IMACW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas IMACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMACW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to IMACW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check IMACW's competition here
UHS vs MNDR Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MNDR has a market cap of 761K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while MNDR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas MNDR's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNDR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to MNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check MNDR's competition here
UHS vs CCM Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CCM has a market cap of 715K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while CCM trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas CCM's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to CCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check CCM's competition here
UHS vs NIVF Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NIVF has a market cap of 579.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NIVF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NIVF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIVF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to NIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NIVF's competition here
UHS vs TALKW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TALKW has a market cap of 385.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TALKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TALKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TALKW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to TALKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TALKW's competition here
UHS vs BACK Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BACK has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while BACK trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas BACK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BACK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to BACK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check BACK's competition here
UHS vs NIVFW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NIVFW has a market cap of 90.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NIVFW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NIVFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIVFW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to NIVFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NIVFW's competition here
UHS vs PIIIW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 87.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while PIIIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check PIIIW's competition here
UHS vs NVOS Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NVOS has a market cap of 69.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NVOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NVOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NVOS's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to NVOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NVOS's competition here
UHS vs IONM Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IONM has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while IONM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas IONM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IONM's ROE of +5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to IONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check IONM's competition here
UHS vs DCGOW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DCGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while DCGOW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas DCGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCGOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to DCGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check DCGOW's competition here
UHS vs KND Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, KND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while KND trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas KND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KND's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to KND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check KND's competition here
UHS vs TLMD Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TLMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TLMD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TLMD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLMD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to TLMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TLMD's competition here
UHS vs DVCR Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, DVCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while DVCR trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas DVCR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DVCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to DVCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check DVCR's competition here
UHS vs TVTY Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TVTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TVTY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TVTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to TVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TVTY's competition here
UHS vs TLMDW Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, TLMDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while TLMDW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas TLMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TLMDW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to TLMDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check TLMDW's competition here
UHS vs AFAM Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, AFAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while AFAM trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas AFAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFAM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to AFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check AFAM's competition here
UHS vs HNGR Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HNGR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while HNGR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas HNGR's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HNGR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to HNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check HNGR's competition here
UHS vs SLHG Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SLHG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SLHG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SLHG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to SLHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SLHG's competition here
UHS vs SLHGP Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SLHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while SLHGP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas SLHGP's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLHGP's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to SLHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check SLHGP's competition here
UHS vs NFH Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NFH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while NFH trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas NFH's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is more volatile compared to NFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check NFH's competition here
UHS vs ATIP-WT Comparison May 2026
UHS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UHS stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ATIP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UHS is priced at $157.35, while ATIP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UHS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.59, whereas ATIP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UHS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATIP-WT's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UHS is less volatile compared to ATIP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UHS.Check ATIP-WT's competition here