American Shared Hospital Services
American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Care Facilities Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | $1.35 | +0.00% | 8.8M | -6.05 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| HCA | $394.07 | +0.38% | 87.4B | 13.57 | $29.04 | +0.75% |
| THC | $173.78 | -2.37% | 15B | 9.04 | $19.24 | N/A |
| SOLV | $76.83 | +0.10% | 13.3B | 9.40 | $8.17 | N/A |
| DVA | $198.52 | -0.07% | 12.7B | 19.13 | $10.38 | N/A |
| FMS | $21.64 | +0.05% | 11.7B | 11.40 | $1.90 | +4.01% |
| EHC | $104.96 | +0.49% | 10.4B | 17.98 | $5.84 | +0.70% |
| ENSG | $171.94 | +0.15% | 10B | 28.05 | $6.13 | +0.15% |
| UHS | $157.80 | -2.86% | 9.9B | 6.58 | $23.96 | +0.50% |
| OSH | $39.00 | +0.08% | 9.5B | -17.65 | -$2.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AMS vs HCA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HCA has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while HCA trades at $394.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas HCA's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCA's ROE of -1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to HCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check HCA's competition here
AMS vs THC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, THC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while THC trades at $173.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas THC's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to THC's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to THC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check THC's competition here
AMS vs SOLV Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SOLV has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SOLV trades at $76.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SOLV's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SOLV's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to SOLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SOLV's competition here
AMS vs DVA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DVA has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while DVA trades at $198.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DVA's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DVA's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to DVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check DVA's competition here
AMS vs FMS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FMS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while FMS trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas FMS's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to FMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check FMS's competition here
AMS vs EHC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, EHC has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while EHC trades at $104.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas EHC's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EHC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to EHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check EHC's competition here
AMS vs ENSG Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ENSG has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ENSG trades at $171.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ENSG's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ENSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ENSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ENSG's competition here
AMS vs UHS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, UHS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while UHS trades at $157.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas UHS's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UHS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to UHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check UHS's competition here
AMS vs OSH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OSH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while OSH trades at $39.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas OSH's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OSH's ROE of +4.64%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to OSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check OSH's competition here
AMS vs CHE Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CHE has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CHE trades at $439.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CHE's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CHE's competition here
AMS vs LHCG Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LHCG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while LHCG trades at $169.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas LHCG's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LHCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to LHCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check LHCG's competition here
AMS vs MMED Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while MMED trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas MMED's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MMED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to MMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check MMED's competition here
AMS vs AMED Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AMED has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AMED trades at $100.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AMED's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AMED's competition here
AMS vs OPCH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, OPCH has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while OPCH trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas OPCH's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OPCH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to OPCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check OPCH's competition here
AMS vs BKD Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BKD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while BKD trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BKD's P/E ratio is -15.28. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BKD's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to BKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check BKD's competition here
AMS vs NHC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NHC has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NHC trades at $196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NHC's P/E ratio is 24.90. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to NHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NHC's competition here
AMS vs LFST Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, LFST has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while LFST trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas LFST's P/E ratio is 123.17. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LFST's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to LFST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check LFST's competition here
AMS vs ACHC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ACHC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ACHC trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ACHC's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ACHC's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ACHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ACHC's competition here
AMS vs SEM Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SEM has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SEM trades at $16.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SEM's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SEM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to SEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SEM's competition here
AMS vs ASTH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ASTH has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ASTH trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ASTH's P/E ratio is 62.05. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ASTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ASTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ASTH's competition here
AMS vs AMEH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AMEH has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AMEH trades at $40.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AMEH's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMEH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AMEH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AMEH's competition here
AMS vs SGRY Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SGRY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SGRY trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SGRY's P/E ratio is -22.68. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SGRY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to SGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SGRY's competition here
AMS vs MD Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while MD trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas MD's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to MD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check MD's competition here
AMS vs ADUS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ADUS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ADUS trades at $92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ADUS's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ADUS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ADUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ADUS's competition here
AMS vs AVAH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AVAH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AVAH trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AVAH's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AVAH's ROE of +2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AVAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AVAH's competition here
AMS vs AGL Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AGL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AGL trades at $86.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AGL's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AGL's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to AGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AGL's competition here
AMS vs HCSG Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HCSG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while HCSG trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas HCSG's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HCSG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to HCSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check HCSG's competition here
AMS vs ARDT Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ARDT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ARDT trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ARDT's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ARDT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ARDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ARDT's competition here
AMS vs BKDT Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BKDT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while BKDT trades at $77.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BKDT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BKDT's ROE of +401.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to BKDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check BKDT's competition here
AMS vs PNTG Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PNTG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while PNTG trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas PNTG's P/E ratio is 39.48. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PNTG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to PNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check PNTG's competition here
AMS vs CMPS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CMPS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CMPS trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CMPS's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMPS's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CMPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CMPS's competition here
AMS vs AMN Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AMN trades at $27.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AMN's P/E ratio is -32.17. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AMN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to AMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AMN's competition here
AMS vs INNV Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, INNV has a market cap of 977.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while INNV trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas INNV's P/E ratio is -90.00. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to INNV's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to INNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check INNV's competition here
AMS vs USPH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, USPH has a market cap of 944M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while USPH trades at $61.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas USPH's P/E ratio is 124.06. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USPH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to USPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check USPH's competition here
AMS vs TALK Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TALK has a market cap of 871.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TALK trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TALK's P/E ratio is 130.00. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TALK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TALK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TALK's competition here
AMS vs FSHCX Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FSHCX has a market cap of 815.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while FSHCX trades at $107.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas FSHCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FSHCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to FSHCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check FSHCX's competition here
AMS vs SNDA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SNDA has a market cap of 739.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SNDA trades at $37.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SNDA's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SNDA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to SNDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SNDA's competition here
AMS vs EHAB Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, EHAB has a market cap of 706.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while EHAB trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas EHAB's P/E ratio is -197.14. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EHAB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to EHAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check EHAB's competition here
AMS vs GMRS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GMRS has a market cap of 501.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while GMRS trades at $11.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GMRS's P/E ratio is 68.81. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GMRS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to GMRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check GMRS's competition here
AMS vs TOI Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TOI has a market cap of 458.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TOI trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TOI's P/E ratio is -13.11. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TOI's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TOI's competition here
AMS vs MCTA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MCTA has a market cap of 445.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while MCTA trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas MCTA's P/E ratio is 419.36. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MCTA's ROE of -2.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to MCTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check MCTA's competition here
AMS vs CCRN Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CCRN has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CCRN trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CCRN's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCRN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CCRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CCRN's competition here
AMS vs CYH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CYH has a market cap of 394.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CYH trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CYH's P/E ratio is 0.81. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CYH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CYH's competition here
AMS vs AIRS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AIRS has a market cap of 376M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AIRS trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AIRS's P/E ratio is -31.35. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIRS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AIRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AIRS's competition here
AMS vs AONC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AONC has a market cap of 351M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AONC trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AONC's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AONC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AONC's competition here
AMS vs AUNA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AUNA has a market cap of 319.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AUNA trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AUNA's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AUNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AUNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AUNA's competition here
AMS vs CSU Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CSU has a market cap of 223.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CSU trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CSU's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CSU's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CSU's competition here
AMS vs JYNT Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, JYNT has a market cap of 127.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while JYNT trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas JYNT's P/E ratio is 99.44. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to JYNT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to JYNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check JYNT's competition here
AMS vs NAKAW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NAKAW has a market cap of 116.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NAKAW trades at $15.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NAKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NAKAW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to NAKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NAKAW's competition here
AMS vs FVE Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FVE has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while FVE trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas FVE's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to FVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check FVE's competition here
AMS vs KDLYW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KDLYW has a market cap of 96.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while KDLYW trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas KDLYW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KDLYW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to KDLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check KDLYW's competition here
AMS vs BTMD Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BTMD has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while BTMD trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BTMD's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BTMD's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to BTMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check BTMD's competition here
AMS vs DCGO Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DCGO has a market cap of 62.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while DCGO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DCGO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCGO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to DCGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check DCGO's competition here
AMS vs ALR Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ALR has a market cap of 44.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ALR trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ALR's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to ALR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ALR's competition here
AMS vs PIII Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PIII has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while PIII trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas PIII's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PIII's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to PIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check PIII's competition here
AMS vs IMAC Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IMAC has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while IMAC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas IMAC's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMAC's ROE of +1183.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to IMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check IMAC's competition here
AMS vs CCEL Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CCEL has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CCEL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CCEL's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCEL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to CCEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CCEL's competition here
AMS vs CANO-WT Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CANO-WT has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CANO-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CANO-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CANO-WT's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to CANO-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CANO-WT's competition here
AMS vs AIH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AIH has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AIH trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AIH's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AIH's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to AIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AIH's competition here
AMS vs CANO Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CANO has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CANO trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CANO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CANO's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to CANO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CANO's competition here
AMS vs FTRP Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, FTRP has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while FTRP trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas FTRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FTRP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to FTRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check FTRP's competition here
AMS vs MODV Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MODV has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while MODV trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas MODV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MODV's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to MODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check MODV's competition here
AMS vs GBNH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, GBNH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while GBNH trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas GBNH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GBNH's ROE of +15.74%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to GBNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check GBNH's competition here
AMS vs RHE-PA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, RHE-PA has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while RHE-PA trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas RHE-PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RHE-PA's ROE of +2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to RHE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check RHE-PA's competition here
AMS vs RHE Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, RHE has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while RHE trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas RHE's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RHE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to RHE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check RHE's competition here
AMS vs SYRA Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SYRA has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SYRA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SYRA's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SYRA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to SYRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SYRA's competition here
AMS vs TOIIW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TOIIW has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TOIIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TOIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TOIIW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TOIIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TOIIW's competition here
AMS vs ATIP Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ATIP has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ATIP trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ATIP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATIP's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to ATIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ATIP's competition here
AMS vs IMACW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IMACW has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while IMACW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas IMACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMACW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to IMACW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check IMACW's competition here
AMS vs MNDR Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, MNDR has a market cap of 761K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while MNDR trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas MNDR's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MNDR's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to MNDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check MNDR's competition here
AMS vs CCM Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, CCM has a market cap of 706.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while CCM trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas CCM's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to CCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check CCM's competition here
AMS vs NIVF Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NIVF has a market cap of 579.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NIVF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NIVF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NIVF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to NIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NIVF's competition here
AMS vs TALKW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TALKW has a market cap of 385.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TALKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TALKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TALKW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to TALKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TALKW's competition here
AMS vs BACK Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, BACK has a market cap of 174.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while BACK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas BACK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BACK's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to BACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check BACK's competition here
AMS vs NIVFW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NIVFW has a market cap of 90.7K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NIVFW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NIVFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NIVFW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to NIVFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NIVFW's competition here
AMS vs PIIIW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, PIIIW has a market cap of 76.3K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while PIIIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas PIIIW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PIIIW's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to PIIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check PIIIW's competition here
AMS vs NVOS Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NVOS has a market cap of 69.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NVOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NVOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVOS's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to NVOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NVOS's competition here
AMS vs IONM Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, IONM has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while IONM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas IONM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IONM's ROE of +5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to IONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check IONM's competition here
AMS vs DCGOW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DCGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while DCGOW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DCGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DCGOW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to DCGOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check DCGOW's competition here
AMS vs KND Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, KND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while KND trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas KND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KND's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to KND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check KND's competition here
AMS vs ATIP-WT Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, ATIP-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while ATIP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas ATIP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATIP-WT's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to ATIP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check ATIP-WT's competition here
AMS vs DVCR Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, DVCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while DVCR trades at $10.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas DVCR's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to DVCR's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to DVCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check DVCR's competition here
AMS vs TVTY Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TVTY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TVTY trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TVTY's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TVTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TVTY's competition here
AMS vs TLMDW Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TLMDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TLMDW trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TLMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TLMDW's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TLMDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TLMDW's competition here
AMS vs AFAM Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, AFAM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while AFAM trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas AFAM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to AFAM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to AFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check AFAM's competition here
AMS vs HNGR Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, HNGR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while HNGR trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas HNGR's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to HNGR's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to HNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check HNGR's competition here
AMS vs SLHG Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SLHG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SLHG trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SLHG's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLHG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is less volatile compared to SLHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SLHG's competition here
AMS vs SLHGP Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, SLHGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while SLHGP trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas SLHGP's P/E ratio is -30.38. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLHGP's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to SLHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check SLHGP's competition here
AMS vs NFH Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, NFH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while NFH trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas NFH's P/E ratio is -19.75. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NFH's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to NFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check NFH's competition here
AMS vs TLMD Comparison May 2026
AMS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AMS stands at 8.8M. In comparison, TLMD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AMS is priced at $1.35, while TLMD trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AMS currently has a P/E ratio of -6.05, whereas TLMD's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, AMS's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TLMD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AMS is more volatile compared to TLMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AMS.Check TLMD's competition here