Tesco PLC (TSCDY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TSCDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSCDY | $18.45 | +1.37% | 39B | 17.08 | $1.08 | +2.91% |
| LBLCF | $47.46 | +1.85% | 55.2B | 29.85 | $1.59 | +0.88% |
| TSCDF | $6.14 | +4.96% | 38.7B | 17.06 | $0.36 | +3.15% |
| AHODF | $43.66 | +11.07% | 38.4B | 14.90 | $2.93 | +3.34% |
| ADRNY | $41.17 | +0.76% | 36.3B | 14.05 | $2.93 | +3.56% |
| WOLWF | $24.91 | N/A | 30.4B | 45.29 | $0.55 | +2.45% |
| SVNDF | $12.00 | +6.48% | 27.7B | 16.22 | $0.74 | +2.75% |
| WNGRF | $73.32 | +1.45% | 27.6B | 37.79 | $1.94 | +1.18% |
| SVNDY | $11.82 | -1.34% | 27.3B | 15.97 | $0.74 | +2.62% |
| CLEGF | $15.00 | -3.51% | 20.1B | 27.78 | $0.54 | +3.36% |
Stock Comparison
TSCDY vs LBLCF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while LBLCF trades at $47.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 29.85. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check LBLCF's competition here
TSCDY vs TSCDF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while TSCDF trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check TSCDF's competition here
TSCDY vs AHODF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while AHODF trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AHODF's competition here
TSCDY vs ADRNY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while ADRNY trades at $41.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check ADRNY's competition here
TSCDY vs WOLWF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while WOLWF trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WOLWF's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while SVNDF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDF's competition here
TSCDY vs WNGRF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while WNGRF trades at $73.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WNGRF's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while SVNDY trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDY's competition here
TSCDY vs CLEGF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CLEGF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CLEGF's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while KKOYY trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYY's competition here
TSCDY vs MTRAF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while MTRAF trades at $68.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTRAF's competition here
TSCDY vs CRERF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CRERF trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRERF's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPBF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CVPBF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPBF's competition here
TSCDY vs CRRFY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CRRFY trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRRFY's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPUF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPUF's competition here
TSCDY vs CPPCY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CPPCY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CPPCY's competition here
TSCDY vs JSNSF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while JSNSF trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSNSF's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while KKOYF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYF's competition here
TSCDY vs JSAIY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while JSAIY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSAIY's competition here
TSCDY vs EMLAF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while EMLAF trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 73.06. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EMLAF's competition here
TSCDY vs DNOPY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while DNOPY trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DNOPY's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while AXFOF trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOF's competition here
TSCDY vs BMBRF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while BMBRF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check BMBRF's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOY's competition here
TSCDY vs DFIHY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while DFIHY trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFIHY's competition here
TSCDY vs KOBNF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KOBNF's competition here
TSCDY vs GCHEF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while GCHEF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GCHEF's competition here
TSCDY vs DFILF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while DFILF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFILF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CUYTF trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CUYTY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTY's competition here
TSCDY vs SHUFF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SHUFF's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDGF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while OCDGF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDGF's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while GGGSY trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSY's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDDY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while OCDDY trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDDY's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while GGGSF trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSF's competition here
TSCDY vs NNWWF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while NNWWF trades at $38.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check NNWWF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUSY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUSY's competition here
TSCDY vs RLEVF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check RLEVF's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 250.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while EUSHY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHY's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUIF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUIF's competition here
TSCDY vs HCMC Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HCMC's competition here
TSCDY vs FLOCF Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check FLOCF's competition here
TSCDY vs MTVX Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTVX's competition here
TSCDY vs OMHI Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OMHI's competition here
TSCDY vs IFMK Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check IFMK's competition here
TSCDY vs HWIN Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HWIN's competition here
TSCDY vs MFLTY Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 776. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MFLTY's competition here
TSCDY vs QKLS Comparison June 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 39B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $18.45, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.08, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check QKLS's competition here