Tesco PLC
Tesco PLC (TSCDY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TSCDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSCDY | $17.93 | -4.59% | 38.7B | 16.63 | $1.10 | +3.14% |
| LBLCF | $44.26 | +0.57% | 51.8B | 27.66 | $1.61 | +0.92% |
| TSCDF | $6.01 | -5.95% | 38.1B | 16.24 | $0.37 | +3.25% |
| ADRNY | $42.87 | +0.21% | 37.6B | 14.36 | $2.97 | +3.41% |
| AHODF | $42.65 | +4.66% | 36.3B | 13.87 | $2.97 | +3.51% |
| WOLWF | $26.50 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 48.18 | $0.55 | +2.30% |
| SVNDY | $11.71 | -1.10% | 27B | 15.37 | $0.76 | +2.69% |
| WNGRF | $69.74 | -0.90% | 26.2B | 35.26 | $1.97 | +1.25% |
| SVNDF | $11.80 | +4.70% | 26.1B | 14.83 | $0.76 | +2.93% |
| CLEGF | $16.00 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 29.09 | $0.55 | +3.15% |
Stock Comparison
TSCDY vs LBLCF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while LBLCF trades at $44.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check LBLCF's competition here
TSCDY vs TSCDF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while TSCDF trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check TSCDF's competition here
TSCDY vs ADRNY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while ADRNY trades at $42.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check ADRNY's competition here
TSCDY vs AHODF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while AHODF trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AHODF's competition here
TSCDY vs WOLWF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while WOLWF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WOLWF's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while SVNDY trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDY's competition here
TSCDY vs WNGRF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while WNGRF trades at $69.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WNGRF's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while SVNDF trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDF's competition here
TSCDY vs CLEGF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CLEGF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 29.09. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CLEGF's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while KKOYY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYY's competition here
TSCDY vs CRRFY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CRRFY trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRRFY's competition here
TSCDY vs CRERF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CRERF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRERF's competition here
TSCDY vs MTRAF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while MTRAF trades at $64.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTRAF's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPBF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CVPBF trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPBF's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPUF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPUF's competition here
TSCDY vs CPPCY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CPPCY trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CPPCY's competition here
TSCDY vs JSNSF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while JSNSF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSNSF's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while KKOYF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYF's competition here
TSCDY vs JSAIY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while JSAIY trades at $16.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSAIY's competition here
TSCDY vs DNOPY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while DNOPY trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DNOPY's competition here
TSCDY vs EMLAF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while EMLAF trades at $33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 68.69. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EMLAF's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while AXFOF trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOF's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOY's competition here
TSCDY vs DFIHY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while DFIHY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -14.64. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFIHY's competition here
TSCDY vs GCHEF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while GCHEF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GCHEF's competition here
TSCDY vs KOBNF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KOBNF's competition here
TSCDY vs DFILF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while DFILF trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFILF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CUYTF trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CUYTY trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTY's competition here
TSCDY vs SHUFF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SHUFF's competition here
TSCDY vs BMBRF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while BMBRF trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check BMBRF's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while GGGSF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSF's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while GGGSY trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSY's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDGF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while OCDGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDGF's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDDY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while OCDDY trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDDY's competition here
TSCDY vs NNWWF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while NNWWF trades at $36.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check NNWWF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUSY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUSY's competition here
TSCDY vs RLEVF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check RLEVF's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while EUSHY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHY's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUIF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUIF's competition here
TSCDY vs HCMC Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HCMC's competition here
TSCDY vs FLOCF Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check FLOCF's competition here
TSCDY vs MTVX Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTVX's competition here
TSCDY vs OMHI Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OMHI's competition here
TSCDY vs IFMK Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check IFMK's competition here
TSCDY vs HWIN Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HWIN's competition here
TSCDY vs MFLTY Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MFLTY's competition here
TSCDY vs QKLS Comparison May 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 38.7B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $17.93, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 16.63, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.16%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check QKLS's competition here